Draft Spotlight: David Wilson, RB, Virginia Tech

April 8th, 2012 | Written by Kip Earlywine

Written by Kip Earlywine

Rundown:   David Wilson is a junior running back from Virginia Tech.  In 2011- his first and only year as the team’s featured back- he posted 1,709 rushing yards, a school record.  He was named ACC player of the year last season.

Age:  20 (June 15, 1991)

Height:  5’10″

Weight:  206

40 time:  4.49

10 yard split:  1.55

3 cone:  7.09

Vertical Jump:  41.00″

Compilation Videos:

vs. Wake Forest

vs. Clemson

vs. Virginia


  • High top gear
  • Strong
  • Disciplined (doesn’t deviate from play call often)
  • Young
  • Productive


  • Lacks vision and instincts; robotic
  • Stiff, linear running style; not very shifty
  • Long strides
  • Only explosive or fast when running straight ahead
  • Not much of an asset as a blocker or receiver
  • Poor ball security

David Wilson is one of, if not the most athletic running backs in the draft- at least among the names you might recognize.  I list vertical jump for some positions as it is believed to correlate well with explosiveness.  Wilson’s 41″ vertical jump was the best out of 67 running backs who attended the combine.  Only two other running backs managed 40″ or more.  Wilson’s 4.49 forty time was roughly 80th percentile among that same group.  His ten yard split and three cone were similarly ranked.  In terms of raw athleticism, it could be argued Wilson is a 1st round talent.  Wilson shows that athleticism on the kind of Golden Tate styled improvised field reversals that cause coaches to lose their hair.  When in the open field, Wilson has an extra gear; in those moments he looks faster than his 4.49 combine time.

Wilson doesn’t break as many tackles as I’d like given his athleticism, but he is strong enough to push defenders for an extra yard.  He doesn’t maximize yardage like Richardson or Polk, but there are moments when his ability to keep his balance and continue a play is impressive.  Despite these gifts and the bounce-it-outside temptation that often comes with them, Wilson remains disciplined as a runner and almost always ends up going where Frank Beamer would want him to.  Wilson follows his blockers consistently, which in the sample I viewed led to an impressive ratio of rushes for gains of four yards or more.

Wilson has his issues, which I will cover in a moment, but time is on his side.  Wilson is one of just a handful of draftable running backs under the age of 21.  Funny enough, the draft’s youngest running back is none other than Trent Richardson- and Wilson is only a month older than Richardson is.  Despite his youth and lack of experience, Wilson was one of the most productive rushers in the country last year.  Only three other running backs finished with more yardage nationally.  Of those three, only LaMichael James has a prayer of being drafted ahead of Wilson.

That said, Wilson is a project at a “you have it or you don’t” position.  Vision, instincts, burst, shiftiness, breaking tackles, having a nose for the endzone… these kind of things are gifts and can’t really be coached.  Its possible that with the benefit of a few more years, Wilson could further hone his craft and make a few improvements*, but I doubt he’ll ever truly discover any of those innate qualities.  When Wilson gets the ball, I already know where he’s going a second before he goes there.  He lacks fluidity and runs to a spot almost like how some system quarterbacks throw to a spot and not to the receiver.

*(improving his blocking and ball security in particular)

Wilson is not especially tall, but he has long legs for his size, and this has in turn given him the curse of being a long stride runner.  Short strides are generally believed to be superior for short distance sprinting, but in the NFL they are useful for other reasons too.  Its easier to make cuts or change direction when your feet are are touching the ground in shorter intervals.  Because of this, Wilson does not look nearly as explosive, shifty, or as athletic on the field as his combine measurables would make you think, and he’s only able to tap into his impressive top gear when he can run in a straight line.

According to Rotoworld, Wilson had 7 fumbles in 290 carries last season and scored poorly in pass protection (he lost a fumble and looked unimpressive in protection in my sampling as well).

In Conclusion:

Ever see a movie that you didn’t really care for, but most people liked it and you figured, “what the heck, why even argue about it?”  That’s pretty much how I feel about David Wilson.  Wilson is a kick returner posing as a running back.  He could end up being a productive NFL back, especially in a “one cut and go” zone blocking system, but he’s not my kind of back.  Seattle may very well feel differently, especially since Marshawn Lynch is under contract for the next four years and Wilson (who is very young) would have plenty of time to improve and develop if drafted by Seattle.  I’d personally give Wilson a 4th round grade, but he will probably be a second rounder- maybe even a second rounder by the Seattle Seahawks.

6 Responses to “Draft Spotlight: David Wilson, RB, Virginia Tech”

  1. Michael (CLT) says:

    Please God, no!

  2. Conner says:

    I’m really thinking it would be wiser to wait until later in the draft to address RB. It is a deep class, and I don’t really see much of a gap between the top guys not named Richardson and guys like Cyrus Gray or Bernard Pierce.

    The depth of the LB class is also pretty strong, so I’m sort of inclined to trading back and picking up additional picks, perhaps enabling the selection of 2 LBs.

    Either way, the depth at LB and RB has me thinking the 2nd round pick should be the best player on the board, regardless of position.

  3. Doug says:

    Ya, we’re running out of things to say… We have hashed it out for weeks now.
    Maybe we should start trying to figure out who we’ll take at the 6th round or something…

  4. Right before the draft I’ll have a post on some late round options. I don’t plan on covering any of them with any kind of detail or scouting though. Any random 6th round prospect, even one Seattle met with, has about a 1% chance of actually being drafted by our team. These reports are actually a lot more work than they look like since I try my best to scout for every writeup. As such, I’m trying to expend my effort on the players who have the highest chance of actually coming here.

    I’m also using some of the insider info to my advantage- that’s why I did that series on mid-to-late round QBs instead of guys like Osweiler and Tannehill. I’m going to be covering RBs and LBs a LOT because I know that those positions will be a very high priority. Seattle’s MO thus far has been to target positions of need rather than BPA. I wouldn’t 100% rule out a “surprise” selection in round 2 or 3, but as things stand now I think we’ll probably see a RB and two LBs be taken in rounds 2-4. I’m trying to focus on the first four rounds since the late rounds are so unpredictable.

  5. Misfit74 says:

    6th round you say?

    I like, in no particular order:


    Edwin Baker, Michigan St., 5’8 204, 4.53
    Bryce Brown, Kansas St., 6’0 223, 4.48
    Michael Smith, Utah St. 5’9 207, 4.36
    Bobby Rainey, Western Kentucky, 5’7 205, 4.53
    Tauren Poole, 5’10 205, 4.54

  6. Attyla the Hawk says:

    “Ever see a movie that you didn’t really care for, but most people liked it and you figured, “what the heck, why even argue about it?” That’s pretty much how I feel about David Wilson.”

    Absolute gold! That so perfectly sums up my feelings on him.

    No argument here.