Seahawks Draft Blog

An observation on Geno Smith and the offense

June 10, 2024 / / 0 Comments

I think Geno Smith is a perfectly adequate bridge to the future. Getting an exceptional young quarterback is the hardest thing to do in the NFL. Pulling it off typically requires an element of fortune. It’s very easy to say ‘get a quarterback’ and very difficult to actually find ‘the guy‘.

The frustrating thing with the Seahawks in recent years has been their unwillingness to draft anyone at the position. This year they acquired Sam Howell and there’s plenty of talk about how much they liked him at North Carolina — but two years ago they weren’t even prepared to use one of two fourth round picks to draft Howell, weeks after trading Russell Wilson. If you liked him, why not draft him?

Yet unless you want to classify Brock Purdy as a miss (I don’t because Purdy unquestionably benefits from — and is ideal for — the Kyle Shanahan scheme), the Seahawks haven’t turned down the opportunity, so far at least, to draft someone since Wilson’s departure who’s gone on to be a fantastic quarterback.

For that reason, Smith as a placeholder makes sense. The Howell trade also provides a younger, cheaper alternative for 2025 if required. They aren’t completely kicking the can down the road, even if they’re long overdue taking someone in the draft.

There are, however, some people who believe Smith is ‘the guy‘. They believe he’s shown he can be the franchise quarterback and that a lot of the issues he has faced as the starter in Seattle are down to other aspects of the team (namely the offensive line).

I do think there’s some merit to this. The O-line continues to struggle, with the annual sweeping changes continuing for a unit that needs consistency. The play-calling did not help the quarterback at times under Shane Waldron. The Head Coach preached an identity focused around running the ball — yet year after year the running game struggled. None of this is conducive with an ideal environment for the quarterback.

However, I also think Smith is by nature a streaky player. He is someone who has shown in his career to have hot and cold runs. Given he has hot and cold streaks with the same O-line, targets and running game, I’m inclined to not just put the bad games down to the supporting cast.

I researched Smith’s three most compelling seasons in his career — the two years starting in Seattle and his final year in college at West Virginia.

In his first six games in that 2012 season for WVU, he threw 25 touchdowns and zero interceptions. His college passer rating averaged 183.4. His completion percentage was 76.5%. Smith was the talk of college football and was the expected #1 overall pick and the Heisman leader. WVU were 5-1, with a crazy back-and-forth 48-45 win in Texas seen as a crowning moment for Smith.

In the next seven games though, he threw 17 touchdowns and six interceptions. His college passer rating dropped to 155.7. His completion percentage dropped to 69%. WVU went 2-5 during this stretch and Smith’s stock collapsed. In a flash he went from being talked about as the #1 pick to potentially not going in round one, such was the dip in performance. Mel Kiper ended 2012 saying he was in a battle to be the second quarterback drafted. His NFL.com draft profile described a player who, “turned down a Senior Bowl invitation after regressing in the second half of the season following a strong start” and “seemingly regressed each week, especially when locking on to one side of the field.”

In 2022 when he won the starting job over Drew Lock, he started brilliantly. In the first eight games his PFF rating averaged 75.8. He averaged 2.2 ‘big time throws’ per game and 1.2 turnover worthy plays per game. His touchdown to interception ratio was 13/3 and the Seahawks earned a 5-3 record. Smith’s name was brought up as a candidate for NFL MVP.

In his final 10 games, his PFF rating dropped to 63.9. His big time throw average dropped to 1.8 per game. His turnover worthy play average increased dramatically to 2.1. He had 19 touchdowns and nine interceptions. The Seahawks finished 4-6.

The 2022 season in Seattle almost perfectly mirrors his final year at West Virginia. He had a hot start, then cooled considerably.

In 2023, the reverse happened. In his first eight games his PFF rating averaged 68.1. He averaged 1.5 big time throws a game and 1.6 turnover worthy plays per game. He threw a 9/7 touchdown-to-interception ratio. Despite this, the Seahawks started 5-3.

In the final seven games, his average PFF grade increased to 75.2. His big time throw average jumped to 2.8 per game and his turnover worthy plays dropped to 1.2 per game. He threw 11 touchdowns and just two interceptions. It speaks to how bad Seattle’s defense was that despite these dramatic improvements, Seattle’s record in the seven games was just 3-4.

I think this is who Geno Smith is. He’s physically gifted and has the kind of tools and ability to wow you over a stretch of games. He also has a propensity to go through an extended rough patch.

I have no doubt that if the Seahawks were able to deliver an excellent offensive line and if Ryan Grubb is a Shanahan/McVay level play-caller, that it’s extremely possible to extend the hot streak and limit the cold streak. I’m just not sure how realistic that is. Without this kind of environment I think Smith will continue to be a hot and cold player — thus showing the difference compared to the top-tier of quarterbacks.

Let’s use Josh Allen as an example. He went into last season with an O-line ranked 22nd in the league per PFF. He didn’t have the weapons Seattle has and the one top receiver he had, Stefon Diggs, was embroiled in a ‘does he want to be there’ summer of headlines.

Allen ranked #1 per PFF at quarterback with a 92.5 grade yet was far from flawless. He had a poor game in week one against the Jets (49.6), struggled in a loss to Denver (58.4) and had a mediocre game against the Patriots in week 17 (61.7). However, he never had an extended run of poor performances. He had isolated ‘off-days’ — which every QB will experience (even Patrick Mahomes). Overall, he elevated the Bills without an amazing supporting cast, offensive line or offensive whiz-kid calling plays (his OC lost his job during the season).

The Bills can rely on Allen to compensate for a non-ideal environment. If the O-line concedes pressure, he has the physical ability to scramble, extend plays or make magic happen. His arm talent is so rare that he elevates the performance of his receivers.

Smith is not that kind of player, which is hardly a criticism by the way. He is someone with good physical tools but requires a degree of competency around him. He’s definitely an athlete but he’s not a great scrambler or extender of plays. If Seattle’s offensive line struggles, I wouldn’t expect him to shine.

This is ultimately why I think they have to be on the look out for someone who can do what Allen can do — because it’s very difficult in the NFL to deliver quality players broadly across your roster. It’s especially hard to build a great offensive line — one of the reasons why elusiveness and improv has become so valued among quarterbacks.

I also think this is why Smith is good enough for the here and now but needs to be seen as a better-than-the-typical bridge rather than anything more than that. He is very much an Alex Smith type for Seattle. I do think, with help, he can lead this team to 10 or 11 wins. Smith had four seasons with the Chiefs where they won 10-12 games. At the same time, Kansas City were clearly very actively looking for better. When they identified Mahomes as their man, they aggressively pursued him. They traded Smith even after a good season.

I believe the Seahawks have the same mentality and are simply yet to find the guy they like to make a move (either with their native pick or by moving up).

I hope I’m wrong and the people who believe Smith is a franchise quarterback are right. That would be great for the Seahawks. I just don’t think it’s likely though, based on the things I’ve written about here and also the apparent league-view of Smith. After all, he tested free agency in 2023 and could only come away with a team-friendly, incentive-laden, minimal commitment contract with the Seahawks. It felt very much like Seattle was dangling him as a trade-chip pre-combine this year, with quid-pro-quo Adam Schefter talking up his trade value in relation to his contract. Nobody bit — meaning John Schneider and Mike Macdonald had to adjust from being noticeably non-committal to Smith during press conferences to suddenly talking him up all the time.

I get the sense Schneider isn’t totally convinced by Smith. I’ve no doubt he’s willing to adjust any opinion he might have based on his performance this year but his review of the quarterback (‘some good, some bad’) when asked after Carroll was fired kind of said it all.

My prediction for 2024 is this. I think Seattle’s offensive line is enough of a question mark that it will prevent Smith from avoiding the hot-and-cold runs highlighted earlier. I think he will have a stretch of play this year where he looks extremely competent and he produces. I also think he will probably have a stretch where he struggles somewhat.

As noted, the way to mitigate this likely would’ve been a major investment in the O-line which simply didn’t happen this off-season. There will definitely be new starters at both guard spots and center — with question marks at every position. There might be a new starter at right tackle too — or Abe Lucas will return with questions about his ability to perform at a good level so soon after recovering from surgery.

If the line struggles it’ll impact the quarterback and the running game. I don’t have much faith in a Laken Tomlinson career revival. Olu Oluwatimi is an unknown at the NFL level and has the limited physical upside you’d expect from a former fifth round pick. I really like Christian Haynes but he’s a rookie. I remain underwhelmed by Charles Cross and want to see more from him in year three. I think they did a good job signing George Fant to cover if needed at right tackle.

I think Smith’s 2024 will be similar to his 2012, 2022 and 2023. Once again, ‘some good, some bad’. That would create quite the discussion point for the next off-season, given Smith’s $38.5m cap hit for 2025. They’d likely have to make a call on a release or an extension. I bet they’ll be keeping a close eye on college quarterbacks in the meantime, looking for the player who can possibly elevate this team for the long-term. Even then, ideally the bridge is positioned for a transition rather than a clean break. It’ll be interesting to see if that’s possible from next year — unless Sam Howell can prove to be the heir apparent over the next 12 months.

If you missed yesterday’s Seahawks roundtable/crossover be sure to check it out:

Why this is a big year for Seahawks left tackle Charles Cross

May 28, 2024 /

I didn’t think Charles Cross was a top-10 pick. I made that case before the 2022 draft, to the chagrin of his pre-draft coach Duke Manyweather who tried to start a pile-on for merely suggesting he wasn’t a blue-chip prospect.

I wasn’t alone. Daniel Jeremiah ranked him 23rd on his top-50 big board. Others felt the same. I gave him a second round grade with the feeling he deserved to go between picks #20-40. The league felt very differently and I recall speaking to someone in personnel days before the draft who guaranteed he’d go between picks #8-11. So it proved.

I thought Cross’ play strength needed major work coming into the NFL and while he undoubtedly had excellent feet enabling him to move in a way untypical of men his size, his testing results were mediocre. He wasn’t an explosive tester, nor did he have exceptional length and size.

His best testing feature was a good forty time (4.95) but he only jumped a scary 26 inch vertical and his agility testing (7.88 three cone and 4.61 shuttle) was nothing to write home about. He was 307lbs at the combine and had 34.5 inch arms.

My fear was that he would have plenty of reps where the footwork is good and he gets into position to make effective blocks. However, against the better pass rushers, there would always be a danger that he’d be overpowered or simply too passive. Cross was never an aggressive blocker — often getting into position then engaging. Personally I just prefer linemen who get after it and seek to be the alpha/dominator in 1v1’s. Abe Lucas did that in college and in his rookie season and it’s one of the reasons why I gave him a first round grade. Cross might have the athleticism to shift into position but if he can’t sustain blocks or if he just gets blown off the ball, he’d give up pressures and sacks. Neither was run-blocking considered a strength.

Watching Cross get dominated by Sam Williams in college then seeing the act repeated in the NFL pre-season was concerning. Mainly because Williams, while a good athlete, is hardly a Nick Bosa level talent. In both games, Williams was very much the aggressor in their matchups.

After two years of Cross I have concerns. I voiced them a few weeks ago and was pleased to see others do the same thing. There’s almost this assumption among fans and media that Cross has been a success or is the answer at left tackle. The jury is out in a major way. He was a top-10 pick and frankly, this is a make or break year for him. You don’t take players in the top-10 to be ‘OK’. They need to become cornerstone players.

I’ve talked about this on PuckSports and with Hawkblogger on the roundtable over the last week. However, something else motivated me to write an article about this today.

PFF published a piece ranking the top-32 offensive tackles in the NFL.

Cross wasn’t even included.

That says it all really. It shows that after two years, he’s trending towards being a disappointment. It’s all the more galling when you realise that the player ranked fifth on the list — Christian Darrisaw — was taken with one of the first round picks Seattle used in the Jamal Adams trade.

PFF’s list isn’t the be-all and end-all and neither is it a definitive statement on Cross’ career. However, it does show that he needs to get things going this year. Something has been made of the recent social media video showing him throwing a medicine ball further than other players on the team. Witnesses have suggested he looks bigger at OTA’s. I feel like we heard all these things 12 months ago. Now I want to see someone who isn’t just a +300lber with good feet. I want to see a player who is taking a leap towards being a top NFL tackle.

Ryan Grubb and Scott Huff’s Washington lines set the tone. The fact they took Christian Haynes in round three suggests that’s the style they intend to bring to Seattle too. This might be a god-send for Cross’ career because they’ll likely ask him to play with a different mentality. They’ll likely light the fire others failed to create.

That’s the positive to cling to here. Yet Cross has to take the opportunity and grasp the nettle. If I were them, I’d send him the link to that PFF article. Are you happy just being a former first round pick? Or do you want to have a great career? Do you want the big money-spinning second contract?

The Seahawks need Cross to be the answer at left tackle. They don’t currently have a long-term franchise quarterback or a Bosa-level edge rusher. They were able to pick a left tackle in the top-10 they hoped would be the answer for an era. So far it hasn’t happened. That has to change in 2024.

More aggression. More play-strength. More performance.

The quarterback dilemma facing the Seahawks and other NFL teams

May 22, 2024 /

Jared Goff has just signed a four-year contract in Detroit worth $212m. His average salary is now $53m a year.

The Lions are paying him legit money to be the guy they hope will lead them to the promise land. They can reason that he should’ve been in the Super Bowl last season but for an epic collapse against San Francisco that was no fault of the quarterback. Goff previously took the Rams to the Super Bowl too.

Alternatively, Sean McVay felt the need to push Goff out of the door a few years ago in an expensive trade to acquire Matt Stafford. That move led to a Championship for the Rams, something McVay clearly felt Goff couldn’t deliver.

This is the dilemma teams often face. The Lions had to make a call. They could pay Goff now, make a statement of commitment and build on the growing momentum around the franchise. Fans in Detroit like Goff and despite the price tag, I doubt anyone was rushing to complain about the contract.

The alternative was to let his deal run down, creating a running storyline about his future while potentially making things even more expensive if he succeeds. Or, they just embrace moving on — whatever happens this year — and just go with someone like Hendon Hooker who they drafted a year ago.

None of these scenarios are ideal. Goff is not an upper echelon passer. He isn’t likely to win the Lions a game with his arm if the rest of the team has an off-day. He’ll likely only ever be as good as his supporting cast and game-plan. Yet if those things click — he’s also shown to be a player who can deliver. He’s ‘just’ talented enough — which shouldn’t be surprising given he was a former #1 overall pick.

The Lions now live in a very expensive compromise — embracing that they could do worse than Goff but also do better — yet the risk of trying to be better could lead to people being fired because, as noted, things could also be worse.

Very few teams get to live in the ideal world of enjoying a cheap rookie contract for an immense talent, then feeling very comfortable paying that player because they know life without their signal caller isn’t worth living. The Texans appear to be in that zone now. The Chiefs and Bills have been there for a while.

The 49ers are about to find themselves in the same predicament as Detroit. Brock Purdy is a good quarterback who is ideally suited to the Kyle Shanahan scheme. He is not a difference maker on his own though and it’s not unrealistic to think Shanahan could find another player to competently run his scheme. Moving off Purdy still carries great risk. The 49ers will probably end up paying him a whopping salary next year and as with Goff — we’ll be wondering if they did the right thing.

Trying to find ‘the guy’ is so unbelievably difficult. It’s why we saw six quarterbacks taken in the top-12 this year. On the face of it some of those decisions felt ridiculous at the time. It’s hard not to argue that the Broncos, for example, epically reached for Bo Nix. Yet Sean Payton knows his era in Denver will only work if he finds the right quarterback for his system. To Payton, that pick likely felt critical rather than risky. Either you take him, or you just kick the can down the road forever — potentially fail — and then live with regret. He saw someone he liked and went with it.

It comes down to the various different approaches to team building. I really like listening to Michael Lombardi at draft time. As a former GM who studies the top players in each class, his insight is valuable. He’s very much in the ‘draft the trenches’ mindset, with a ‘best player available’ approach. I’ve got sources in the league who have been GM’s or scout at a decent level. They often share that sentiment. Add good players. Don’t force anything. That certainly seems to be John Schneider’s mantra too.

Yet there are others who believe you’ll only go as far as your quarterback can take you. I don’t think that idea can be outright dismissed. If Denver spent the next two years building up a roster, does Payton get a third year to draft a quarterback then a fourth and fifth to get them up to speed? Will he see anyone he likes more than Nix, even if it means drafting him 50 spots higher than is probably warranted? Denver didn’t have a second round pick this year.

Now, at least Payton and his quarterback are tied together and they will succeed or fail with each other, rather than waiting for the holy grail that may never come.

That in itself is a hard sell, at least to me. I don’t like reaching for a quarterback but I also think an approach of waiting for the right player to fall into your lap is idealistic and wishful. Very few quarterbacks go in rounds 2/3 these days. You’re either good enough to warrant going early, or the league doesn’t rate you (for whatever reason — on or off the field).

Unless you’re going to be aggressive or simply bad enough to pick very early, waiting can just lead you to be endlessly searching. You could argue that eventually you need to take a chance. Then you’ve got to hope it comes off. Yet you can’t approach this situation with fear. I think owners should empower their GM’s to take chances and not feel like their jobs rely on the first big quarterback investment succeeding.

Finding a franchise quarterback is also, frankly, rarely the result of an outstanding plan. The Chiefs aggressively trading up for Patrick Mahomes now looks like a genius move. One of the single greatest front office decisions ever, possibly the best. Often, though, it’s sheer luck. The Patriots finding the GOAT in round six. The Seahawks waiting until pick #75 to select their Super Bowl winning quarterback. Being bad enough at the ideal moment to be able to select Joe Burrow with the #1 pick instead of Trevon Walker.

The Bears are lucky too, even though many will credit their front office. They essentially snubbed the chance to draft C.J. Stroud a year ago. That could’ve been disastrous if the Panthers, who moved up to #1 overall, hadn’t been so appalling that they gifted Chicago the top pick this year. Imagine if the Panthers were the eighth worst team in 2023 rather than the worst? The Bears would’ve passed on Stroud, just as they previously passed on Mahomes — and for what exactly? Now they get Caleb Williams instead. Truth be told, they might still regret that they passed on Stroud.

The Seahawks currently find themselves in a murky unknown at the position. They don’t have a long term solution at the position. They’re not financially committed to Geno Smith beyond this year. They felt obliged to trade for Sam Howell to see if he can potentially be an answer. They’re searching yet not finding players in the draft they want to invest in year after year.

I sense a lot of fans and media don’t have the appetite to discuss this topic. Smith has a very vocal (and aggressive) support group online. That might be why. Yet the cold hard truth is Seattle’s GM and Head Coach were totally non-committal to Smith before the combine, quid-pro-quo reporter Adam Schefter was speculating about his trade value, then after the combine once the Seahawks had done some fact-finding and watched Drew Lock (who they talked up a ton) go to the Giants, suddenly the tables turned in the public discourse. Geno was now the man.

Any time you bring up this extremely fair review of the situation, you run the risk of feeling the wrath of Smith’s online following. Yet I think it’s perfectly reasonable to suggest the Seahawks kind of stumbled and bumbled at the position this off-season and are once again left in a situation, three off-seasons removed from the Russell Wilson trade, where they have no long-term clarity on the most important individual position in pro-sport.

How they move beyond this, though, is incredibly difficult to work out.

PFF ranked Smith the 18th best quarterback in the NFL this week, noting:

Smith’s two years have been a tale of four quarters. In the first half of 2022, he earned the third-highest passing grade in the league. In the second half, he led the league in turnover-worthy plays. In the first half of 2023, he had more turnover-worthy plays (13) than big-time throws (11). But from Week 10 on, he was top five in passing grade and big-time throws.

At 33 years old and entering the final year of his deal with guaranteed money, Smith may not be seen as a franchise quarterback. But he is absolutely the kind of guy who can engineer a win in any given week.

To me, that feels like a very fair assessment.

If Smith delivers this year as the starter, he might end up with a Goff-type agreement. Perhaps not quite as expensive — Goff is 29 after all and has been to a Super Bowl and a NFC Championship game. The Seahawks, though, would face the same dilemma as the Lions. Are you better off paying a lot of money for what you have, or running the risk of trying to find better?

I wrote a year ago that the worst case scenario for the Seahawks in 2023 would be for Smith to play ‘OK’ in his second season as a starter. Sadly, that’s more or less what happened. His stats regressed in many areas to the extent he hit none of his contract escalators. Yet he wasn’t so bad that it created urgency to move on. I think it’d be unfair to call this an awkward marriage of convenience but it’s not a million miles away. The Seahawks likely want to do better — that’s what their words and actions suggested this off-season — but they’re not sure how to make it happen.

I re-watched the Seahawks vs Commanders game from 2023 this week. Both Smith and Howell had good moments. Especially at the end. The two QB’s were battling to win the game with some clutch throws. Yet you also had a sloppy turnover on a fumble by Howell, an awful end to the first half where Smith takes a highly avoidable grounding call to blow a chance at a field goal and both players missed throws. Howell finished 29/44, Smith 31/47. Howell’s PFF grade was an OK-ish 68.4 and Smith’s a slightly better 71.5.

Watching that game I couldn’t help but feel like either player, on their day, could win you a game. It’s also possible with a great supporting cast, neither quarterback will hideously squander talent at other positions. I’d also suggest that both players are likely to be streaky and probably aren’t good enough to be difference makers in key playoff games (possibly on the road). Someone will say it’s too early in Howell’s career to judge, which might be fair. Let’s also remember he’s a former fifth round pick who just threw 21 interceptions in a single season.

The 2011 Seahawks had a lot of great pieces but finished 7-9 as they mixed between a playing-hurt Tarvaris Jackson and Charlie Whitehurst at quarterback. A year later, Russell Wilson delivered a major QB upgrade to elevate the team to 11-5. After he navigated some rookie growing pains, he excelled. In their final game — the playoff defeat in Atlanta — he practically carried the team as the defense minus Chris Clemons completely choked.

With Joe Burrow, the Bengals won 22 regular season games in 2021 and 2022. They made the Super Bowl in 2021, then the AFC Championship game the following year. Without Burrow, they regressed to 9-8 and missed the playoffs despite having a pretty good roster. The Bills over the last few years have also had a decent roster — but they likely don’t get close to the Super Bowl in a competitive AFC without Josh Allen.

I appreciate there are other, more favourable examples. How good is Jalen Hurts? I’d suggest in 2022 he was excellent. Last year, not so much. Now we get to see if coaching changes will make that a one-off or suggest he’s a player who simply overachieved early in his NFL career. Purdy isn’t a Mahomes, Allen or Burrow type talent and you could argue Shanahan is the genuine MVP of San Francisco’s offense, ably supported by elite players on defense. Not good players, elite players. The kind Seattle is trying to find or develop.

I genuinely believe the Seahawks will not reach the top of the tree without finding an excellent quarterback. Someone who can ultimately match up to the best in the game, take them on (including on the road) and deliver — even when other aspects of the team might not be functioning. I can’t sit here, though, and tell you how they pull that off. I don’t know. Even in the unlikely event they end up with a top-five pick in the 2025 draft, I’m not sure the answer is there.

I still have work to do on the 2025 quarterback class so won’t go into any big review here. I understand why Carson Beck is the media favourite currently. To me, he looks like a better version of J.J. McCarthy. Is he a true difference maker? Not sure. Shedeur Sanders is tweeting his way into the middle rounds. He’s talented but there’s a lot going on there. Riley Leonard has excellent physical potential but needs to become a refined passer not just an athlete. He’s also dealing with the ankle injury Duke ridiculously allowed him to play with at the end of last season. Jaxson Dart has some talent but is often a frustrating watch due to hit-and-miss accuracy within a scheme that does all the heavy lifting. Drew Allar’s accuracy, so far, has been a real problem on tape. Cam Ward has to contend with playing for Mario Cristobal.

There are others I like, such as Brady Cook at Missouri, who I look forward to watching this year. I’m also really intrigued by Minnesota transfer Max Brosmer (but we need to see him in the BIG-10).

The player I keep coming back to is Quinn Ewers. There are going to be a lot of mixed opinions on Ewers. This is a player who has been billed from a young age to be a prodigy. The natural talent is off the charts. The expectation was that he would be a classic three-and-done in college, yet his career has not gone smoothly. From going to Ohio State, then transferring to Texas, then having injury issues and playing an inconsistent brand of football.

He’s also had to contend with the attention Arch Manning gets and that will ramp up this season if/when Ewers has anything close to a bad game. He’s lost his top three receivers (including a first and second round pick) plus a safety-valve tight end. Texas are now in the SEC and have scheduled a non-conference road game at Michigan too.

How Ewers handles all of this will be fascinating. I suspect there won’t be any middle ground. He’ll either thrive and therefore elevate his stock, possibly into the upper part of round one. Or he’s going to struggle and who knows what happens then? Transfer again? Enter the draft and last longer than anyone expected when he burst onto the scene? Can he even stay healthy for a full season?

The upside potential of Ewers is better than some will have you believe. I think he’s a player scouts might like more than the media — but I’ve also heard people (such as Rick Spielman) suggest he isn’t a first round talent. I think his quick release, ability to throw layered and complex passes, his downfield ability (ideal velocity and loft on some throws), athleticism and arm talent make for the most intriguing storyline in college football this year.

He’s also someone I can well imagine John Schneider liking — although I’m more convinced than ever that what Schneider wants is essentially a version of Brett Favre — creativity, downfield gunslinging, unpredictability yet with exceptional talent. Ewers fits some of that, although he isn’t in the size range of previous Schneider-liked QB’s (Lock, Whitehurst, Mahomes, Allen). Clearly he’s not tied to big and tall though, as we’ve seen with Howell and Wilson (who both have some of that Favre unpredictability to them).

It’s not an entirely optimistic outlook though, is it? Maybe Ewers will fit while hoping others step up. Meanwhile the Seahawks will need to make a decision on Smith in eight months, while analysing what exactly they have in Howell.

A former GM once told me that anyone can watch a player and identify what ‘good’ looks like. The key is to find greatness — and that’s a lot harder, even for the very experienced GM’s in the league. A lot of people in the NFL were convinced Bryce Young was the top quarterback in the 2023 draft, not C.J. Stroud. Even Kyle Shanahan didn’t recognise greatness in Mahomes, when the 49ers had an opportunity to draft him in 2017.

How the Seahawks find clarity with their quarterback situation isn’t obvious, short of Smith (or Howell) playing brilliantly. Even then, they might find themselves — as with Detroit — locked into an expensive ‘could be worse, could be better’ situation.

There’s a reason why teams find themselves going years, sometimes decades without having a proper difference-making franchise quarterback. This isn’t easy. But the chances are the Seahawks will need to produce an answer sooner rather than later, if they want to sit at the top table of the NFL.

« Older posts

© 2024 Seahawks Draft Blog

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑