Five possible options for Seahawks at #25

Marvin Austin: a first round option for the Seahawks?


Presuming the Seahawks stick at #25 and the top quarterbacks are off the board, what will they do? We’ve looked at different options in the mock drafts but today I want to focus on five logical targets. Not all of these players will necessarily be available but they could go in the 20-32 range. 

No position is more important to Seattle than finding a long term quarterback. However, I don’t expect the Seahawks to reach on a second or third tier player. Despite an incredibly positive press for Christian Ponder, Andy Dalton and Colin Kaepernick I don’t expect any quarterback outside the ‘top four’ to be considered at #25. Let’s not forget how many people last year were touting Colt McCoy as a first or second round pick, Tony Pike as a possible third rounder and Dan LeFevour was even ranked by some as a second round sleeper. The same thing will happen this year unless rampant need (and therefore insanity) takes over the NFL. 

With that in mind, who could be in play for the Seahawks? 

Note: Please refer to the latest mock draft for a breakdown on the areas I believe certain prospects will leave the board 

Muhammad Wilkerson (DE/DT, Temple) 

It makes sense to start with the player I’ve pinned to Seattle in my last two mock drafts. Wilkerson has his sceptics with some questioning his first round credentials. Others rate him much higher (he’s #10 on Mel Kiper’s most recent big board). Reports have suggested both Baltimore and New Orleans are showing strong interest in Wilkerson and the Seahawks reportedly arranged a meeting with him for this week

My own view is mixed. You can’t help but be impressed by a 315lbs lineman who rushed predominantly off the edge and recorded ten sacks in 2010. He moves well for a big guy and appears to be a logical fit for Seattle’s 5-technique position. The team want to add depth on the defensive line and adding Wilkerson would create that – with both Red Bryant and possibly Wilkerson being capable of playing two positions.  

The question marks arise in whether he’d be able to make that smooth transition to the three-technique – a position he can attempt to play early (particularly on obvious passing downs) but would need to learn and develop from scratch. Should the Seahawks lose Brandon Mebane whenever free agency begins, it’ll leave a size-able hole inside. Even if Mebane is retained really the coaches should be considering moving him back to the one-technique where he thrived earlier in his NFL career.  

Wilkerson has the size to play the Bryant position while offering a better overall pass rush threat from the edge. He may never be that elite difference maker on a defensive line, but he’d offer the size and depth Seattle is looking for. If he can translate his pass-rush production to the next level, he’s more than capable of becoming a staple player on a NFL defense. 

Marvin Austin (DT, North Carolina) 

Not a player I’ve really considered at #25, but certainly someone who’s enjoying a productive off-season. When I watched Austin in 2009 I wasn’t really impressed. He didn’t stand out on a talented defense including Bruce Carter and Robert Quinn, so I was interested to see more in 2010. Then obviously he was suspended before the first UNC game of the year – which I still studied closely. He travelled to the game with friends and sat in the stands laughing and joking throughout (the camera switched to him regularly). It wasn’t a good mental image of a guy I believe was asked to stay away by the team during the ongoing NCAA investigation. 

Austin missed the whole season and a player I already ranked in the R2/3 range appeared to be sinking further. It looks like he spent that time off wisely because he’s had a sensational off-season. For starters, he was the stand out prospect at the East/West shrine work outs. He continued to slim down and thoroughly impressed at the combine – running an eye catching 4.8 forty yard dash (superior to Nick Fairley despite being 20lbs heavier). He also benched 225lbs 38 times which was only bettered by Stephen Paea’s 49 reps. The momentum continued at this week’s UNC pro-day and people are starting to talk about a rise back up the boards. 

I’ve seen interviews with Austin and he’s a personable guy with a big personality. There are some concerns about his work ethic and clearly that suspension issue needs to be studied with some serious questions asked. My impression is – this guy got serious when it really mattered and the work outs are better than the tape. What I need to know is whether that will continue once he’s drafted or whether he reverts back to type. He needs to perform better in the NFL than he did in the 2009 college season, he needs to play like a 4.8, strong 309lbs defensive lineman every week. The potential for success is incredible from an athletic stand point and I have no issue with his run defense, but he needs to refine his pass rush technique to be more effective as a potential three-tech. 

If he’s really a fast enough riser to get into that 20-32 range it makes sense that both New Orleans and Seattle will consider him. High risk, potentially a very high reward with great potential but needs to bring it. I’d still have major reservations about the work outs being vastly superior to the tape, but NFL teams will do their homework. 

Jabaal Sheard (DE, Pittsburgh) 

 One of my favorite players in the draft. When I projected Sheard and Brooks Reed as potential late first round picks in February, I received a lot of tweets like this one questioning my sanity. Both players have since gained a lot of momentum and should go in that 20-40 range. I suspect Sheard could go even earlier than that considering his skill set – we’re talking about a physical beast of a player with great burst off the line, good edge speed and plays strongly against the run despite only weighing around 265lbs. 

It really wouldn’t surprise me if a team like Jacksonville took a punt on Sheard and the two teams that follow (New England and San Diego) could easily show interest. In my last mock I had him at #20 to Tampa Bay – a team with a huge need at DE who could see real value with that pick. I think he’s more suited to a 4-3 than most think – with people wrongly assuming he’d fit better at 3-4 OLB because of the size. 

If he lasts until #25 he has to be on Seattle’s radar because there may not be a better LEO candidate in this draft class outside of Robert Quinn. The Seahawks need a smaller lineman who can maximise one-on-one match-ups, flash that burst to beat a man off the edge yet hold up against the run. People ultimately think Von Miller would be a good LEO pass rusher, but that’s not true. He’d be a complete liability against the run given his size playing on a four-man front at end and would almost certainly have to play linebacker in Seattle. The Seahawks need a player more in the Sheard mould. 

Chris Clemons is contracted to another year but Raheem Brock is not. With Reed and Sheard in that 20-40 range they have to be options for Seattle. Let’s also get one thing straight – Clemons had a good 2010 season but he’s 30 in October. Pairing him with a young edge rusher for the future could seriously upgrade the Seahawks defense for the long term. 

Mike Pouncey (OG/OC Florida) 

 I’d like to think the Seahawks would consider extending the contract of Chris Spencer after an under rated 2010 season where he was arguably Seattle’s most consistent offensive lineman. Considering the major repair work needed in the team’s interior o-line, it makes little sense in my opinion to lose a guy who started every game last year and looked comfortable throughout. 

Whether Spencer is retained or not, the team could still use a long term option at guard. When you’re drafting for that position in round one you have to be confident the player you’re getting is special. I think some teams will feel that way about Mike Pouncey, particularly after his brother had such a productive rookie season for Pittsburgh. I’m not convinced Mike is special – at least enough for me to ignore the depth at guard available in round two (Watkins, Hudson, Franklin, Rackley etc). If the Seahawks want to play it safe though, they could go in that direction.  

I’m also not convinced he’ll last until #25 and the Maurkice-factor may play a part in that. Miami are desperate for a center and could be a wild card as high as #15 (perhaps they trade down?). New England and San Diego are possible options after that, as are the New York Giants. Kansas City would be a logical home because Pouncey ticks every box Scott Pioli looks for in a prospect including faultless character, leadership and work ethic. Even if Pouncey gets past that cluster, the Philadelphia Eagles would need a reason to pass at #23. 

It’s not impossible, but I’d say it’s unlikely. However – many teams are sceptical about adding guards in round one and with options available later, I wouldn’t rule out a fall to #25. He’d have to be at least considerd by the Seahawks if he gets that far. 

Jimmy Smith (CB, Colorado) 

 I’ve never hidden my admiration for Smith – I think he’s a top-ten talent. If the Seahawks picked ten places higher in the draft I’d be championing the franchise to select this guy. I know the character concerns exist and you can’t just ignore that all together. However, not many players have impressed me as much as Jimmy Smith during my time writing this blog. People wax lyrical about Patrick Peterson and how he could/should be the #1 overall pick, but for me there’s a paper’s width between Peterson and Smith. I actually think there’s a fairly good chance Smith will have the better career. 

Speed, height, reactions, instinct – Smith has the complete package. People talk about a lack of effort at times yet I saw little evidence of that and I’m not going to overly criticise a corner back for a sluggish tackle or half hearted effort to shed a block if he’s consistently great in coverage. Dig out the tape of Colorado vs Oklahoma and watch how he performs against a pass-happy offense (and notice how little he’s targeted). 

I don’t like making outlandish comparisons because they are generally quite lazy and unfair. I have no problem linking Smith to Nnamdi Asomugha (who was a late first round pick). 

In my last mock draft I had Philadelphia taking him at #23 which would be a steal. Whether he lasts that far or until #25 will depend on the character concerns. Again, you can’t ignore them. If a talent like Smith falls into the 20’s that in itself sets off alarm bells. I wouldn’t be surprised if he did end up a top ten pick and Tennessee can’t be ruled out at #8 considering their need at corner. If he does last to #25 though I’m taking that chance. Surround him with leadership, mentor him and work on the off-field stuff. If you get it right, you could find that rare #1 gem at corner to go alongside Earl Thomas and Walter Thurmond in a blossoming young secondary. Smith has elite potential. 


I appreciate there are other candidates here and things will change, but as of April 2nd these are the names I’m focusing on. Four of the five are lineman and I want to stress this wasn’t necessarily done intentionally. I think quarterback is the team’s greatest need by far, but they aren’t taking a QB at #25 unless Newton, Gabbert, Locker or Mallett drops. I’m not even convinced every name in that quartet would be considered if they are available – although I don’t think any will get past the mid-teens in round one. 

Wide receiver is still a need because the offense simply does not have enough game changers. Outside of AJ Green and Julio Jones it’s hard to project the next best receiver and exactly where they’ll fall. 

There’s simply no getting away from the fact that in the 20-40 area, the best value is going to come on the defensive line. I could’ve thrown in more names for this piece – Phil Taylor (DT, Baylor), Brooks Reed (DE, Arizona), Jarvis Jenkins (DT, Clemson), Christian Ballard (DE, Iowa), Justin Houston (DE, Georgia)d or Terrell McClain (DT, USF). Coincidentally I don’t think Adrian Clayborn (DE, Iowa) is a good fit for Seattle either in the Red Bryant position or as a LEO rusher. Neither am I convinced Stephen Paea (DT Oregon State) is a logical scheme fit as a smaller one technique. 

The option to move around and get creative is open yet unpredictable. If the team stays put at #25, unless the Smith’s and Pouncey’s do drop, I suspect the Seahawks wil be adding a defensive lineman to their roster on April 28th. A lot can change, though – especially after the impending court case this week which could potentially end the lockout.


  1. kevin mullen


    Spot effing on, dude! There’s not one thing I disagree with all these choices. And believe me, I tried.

    I’ve watched some Wilkerson highlights as of late, dude is seriously light on his feet for a +300lb guy. He kind of reminds me of an Albert Haynesworth circa 2008. The more and more I watch this guy, the more I like him.

  2. Card1

    You don’t believe Mallett will be there @25?? He’s dropped completely out of round 1 on pretty much every board I’ve seen. (there’s a new round of rumors about him going around- that GMs have have shifted their concerns from the possible drug use to “nonexistent leadership skills.”) In fact, I think the majority of the big name draft pundits have both Mallett and Locker in the second.

    • Matt

      These are the same guys saying Ponder anid Dalton in round 1.

    • ChavaC

      I heard rumors that he was a closet nazi and steals from old ladies. Simply put, he’s undraftable.. give me Christian “The Cannon” Ponder.

      • Rob

        Kudos to ChavaC – that post was pretty hilarious.

        Card1 – I’m prepared to be proven wrong. A lot gets said by national pundits that doesn’t come true. As Matt says, these are the same people vaulting Dalton and Ponder into round one which won’t happen.

        • Card1

          Personally, I’d take him too(and I DO think that 90% of the rumor mill is BS). I just don’t think that both Locker and Mallett will be gone @25. I think somebody might take a flyer on Jake, but too many teams are saying they’ll pass on Mallett. They can’t all be blowing smoke (or maybe they are, who knows?) Maybe (or probably) it’s wishful thinking on my part.

          • Rob

            The old saying goes though – it only takes one team to like a guy. I suspect at least one of the Minnesota, Miami, Jacksonville group will like Mallett enough to take him.

  3. NorthVanman

    These are good choices. I really like Tyron Smith the RT from USC. I know he’s unlikely to fall to us at 25, but I think he could be as good as Walter Jones. IT’s unlikely we’d move up but this guy is something special.

    • Dave

      Thats quite a stretch to say that Smith will be the best offensive tackle in the history of the NFL

  4. Cliff

    I think if Mallet or Locker falls and is sitting there before we get a chance at #25 then Philly and the Saints will be offered a lot to trade down to the top of the 2nd from a team like the Bills, Cinn, Wash… anyone who needs a QB. Maybe a good thing if Philly dropped and we got Smith assuming the Bucs pass and go a la Sheard or some other DE.

  5. Al

    When I see the Colts I get big time Freeney – Mathis envy. I haven’t seen much of Sheard at all. However, it sounds as though he has potential to be a similar performer to those guys, in which case he’d be my ideal #1 if the QBs aren’t available.

  6. kevin mullen

    I’m intrigued by Marvin Austin. Not much tape out there but the ones I seen he looks good. Hopefully he wouldn’t be a Marcus Tubbs 2.0

    Where would you rate him among defensive tackles, Rob?

    • Rob

      I graded him in round three (or late second at a push) when I watched UNC in 2009. The issue I have with Austin is to grade him higher would go against everything I work with during the season – tape must come before combine. Yet you see Austin run as well as he did, you see that performance at the Shrine Game and senior bowl, you see the potential in that 309lbs frame and it’s hard to ignore. Personally I’d maintain that at #57, you think about taking the chance. At #25, I’d be concerned that he’ll revert to type once the cheque comes in.

      I think you have three guys in Dareus, Liuget and Fairley that are going to go in the top-18. Then there’s a drop to your Taylor, Paea, Austin types. But he’s rising after this off season and a lot of people grade him higher than I do based on ’09.

      • kevin mullen

        It was tough to see his potential when you have Robert Quinn on the edge. He didn’t garner much double teams but he does disengage off the block well. He can collapse the pocket, reminds me a lot like Colin Cole but better pass rush skills.

        If he’s still there with our 4th rd pick, I’d consider it a major steal. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see him go as high as a late 2nd, he’d be good depth behind Cole and Mebane. (Hopefully Wilkerson too!)

  7. Matthew Baldwin

    Nice post Rob. I really like the 5 players at 25 format. Any chance you could put a top 5 players to consider for rounds 2, 4 and 5?

    • Blake

      I agree this is a great format for a post. Matthew, trying to push this format to the later rounds, I see a lot of offensive linemen being valuable at the places we’re picking. As many as 10 offensive linemen could go in the 2nd round and any of them would be a solid pick for us. Cannon is a guy I like in that range, moreso than Hudson. I also like Carpenter and Boling. WR also will be a very valuable position in the 2nd round with Baldwin, Young, Smith, Hankerson, and Little all likely being chosen in that round. If any of them are available to us, all could be justified as solid picks. Its so tough for anyone to project what players will be available at a given point after the top 40 that it would likely have to be 10 options if Rob pushed this format for later rounds, but I would say 3-4 guards, 3-4 receivers, and a QB or two would all be in the mix in the 2nd round.

    • Rob

      Certainly we can look at it for round two – but when you get to rounds 4/5 you’re looking at a really think market it’s difficult to project.

  8. Rob

    By the way guys – no post today. Busy work day and tied up until late. I’ll have something on the blog tomorrow. If anyone has any questions or anything leave them in the comments section.

    • Charlie

      Hey rob, what are your thoughts on Aaron williams running 4.42 at 200 lbs at his pro day? I know it’s not always transitional to the field, but he ran a .1 second faster at 10lbs heavier than his combine mark

      • Blake

        Texas is known for having the fastest track in all of college football. It’s universally known so scouts normally do not put a lot of stock into Texas Pro Day 40s. I wouldn’t either.

        • Rob

          Blake makes a good point Charlie. Williams didn’t stand out in any way when I watched Texas during the last two years. He’s pretty average in every aspect but doesn’t excel anywhere, be it speed, reactions, ball skills, physicality. I have him in the R2/3 range but wouldn’t be surprised if he went in the 3-4 area.

  9. Ray Smith

    Thanks again Rob, I put a lot of trust in your opinion having read your post for the past year and half and knowing that you put in the time. There is also no mistaking your passion which I appreciate, even when it rails against my posts 🙂

    I just don’t trust Marvin Austin at 25 because of past issues but don’t think he’ll be there at 57 either. Hopefully we can trade back a bit and get a 2 for 1. Even getting someone’s 2nd for next year, depending on the team, is almost like getting a 1st.

    • Rob

      Thanks for the kind words Ray, it’s always appreciated and you make a very good point on Austin.

  10. Ray Smith

    One more thing, I have really fallen off of the Jake Locker wagon and now believe there are only 3 first round quarterbacks. What really convinced me was Joyner’s recent article where he places Ponder ahead of Locker, and with good evidence.

© 2024 Seahawks Draft Blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑