If you watched my stream a week ago (click here if you didn’t) you will know why I’ve shaped the conversation a certain way over the last few days. As I said at the time, I’m not an insider. Yet after 20 years of doing this blog, you’d be surprised who you come into contact with.

None of the information I receive is specific to the Seahawks. It’s always general to the draft class. One of the things discussed in the stream was the relative ‘meh’ feeling about the offensive linemen in round one. Another thing was discovering just how highly regarded Emeka Egbuka is. There’s a lot of other info I’d recommend checking out in the video.

This shaped my latest mock draft with the Seahawks taking Egbuka at #18 as a ‘quintessential’ Seahawks type player, then waiting on the offensive line.

It makes further sense given Daniel Jeremiah and Mel Kiper moved Egbuka up to 17th and 18th respectively on their big boards. Tony Pauline reported a feeling within the league that the Seahawks could go receiver at #18. Numerous mocks are projecting that idea.

I don’t think it’s ‘nailed on’ by any stretch. There are a handful of players that fit, as we’ve discussed, not just Egbuka. Malaki Starks, Donovan Ezeiruaku and Grey Zabel to name three. Matthew Golden is an alternative receiver option.

With the Colts, Cardinals and Bengals all needing an offensive lineman, there’s a chance Zabel won’t last. In that situation, the Seahawks will probably have no choice but to pivot. They cannot reach. They should not reach. They will take the best player on their board.

Even if Zabel is available, it is not 100% clear that the Seahawks will view him as a player worthy of #18. Some evaluators think that is too high.

I don’t get the sense there’s any panic among the front office about the offensive line — whether you think there should be or not. Seattle’s ability to build a great line will not rely solely on first round picks, especially in a draft where the high-pick options are not great. As we’ve also discussed, good ‘zone blocking’ fits will be available on days two and three.

As someone who has been critical of the Seahawks in the past, having spoken about the need to fix the O-line as a priority, I’m comfortable with the situation. I would hope that means something. I don’t carry water for the team or the GM. I’ve studied this draft rigorously and paired with information from my sources, I think reaching for certain linemen would be unwise. Equally, after studying the free agent options, I think the Seahawks did the right thing in targeting Will Fries, concluding the Vikings offer was not worth beating, then accepting the situation. The other options were not great or universally rated, so throwing good money at bad or average players would’ve been a bad idea.

I appreciate some people don’t want to hear this. They want to say it’s the same old Seahawks — as if they’ve been deliberately avoiding the offensive line need as part of their philosophy. They aren’t. I’m 100% sure they’d love nothing more than to draft an exceptional offensive lineman at #18.

If that player isn’t there, what can you do?

It’s no different really than demanding the team drafts an outstanding franchise quarterback. These players are rare. You can’t take a QB just because, then expect them to be great. It’s no different with offensive linemen. The player has to be worth the pick, based on your evaluation.

There are very few elite guards and centers in the NFL. That’s the reality.

The best center in the NFL was a late second round pick (#63 overall). PFF’s top-five from 2024 also included a fourth rounder and another second rounder. Cam Jurgens was a second rounder and so was Landon Dickerson. The top-10 guards include a third rounder from UW-Whitewhater, a fourth round converted left tackle and an undrafted player from Western Kentucky.

The prize free agent guard everyone wanted before he was franchised, Trey Smith, was a sixth round pick.

As much as we all want the Seahawks to fix this issue, John Schneider, nor anyone else, can create supply to match demand. ‘Just take or pay a lineman’ is not a reasonable request. You have to play the cards you are dealt, in free agency and the draft.

Have mistakes been made in the past? Yes, absolutely. But people sometimes act like the Seahawks were the only team to pass on Humphrey. In reality, the entire league passed on him twice. The entire league allowed Dickerson and Jurgens to reach round two. The entire league allowed Quinn Meinerz to last until round three. The entire league allowed Smith to reach round six.

This is one of the trickiest units to build and the Seahawks are not alone. You might want to continue to discuss Seattle’s misses of yesteryear when reflecting on whether the Seahawks will get it right in 2025. All I’d say is, for me, they’ve just executed one of the most effective and impressive off-seasons in a long while, a year after hiring a talented young Head Coach and now pairing him with an intriguing, experienced offensive staff.

I think the GM deserves an opportunity to show what he can do with this draft class and the coaching staff deserve an opportunity to work with the group they take on.

It might be slow progress. But let’s not act like a quick fix was available. When the Chiefs revolutionised their O-line in 2021, they didn’t just draft Humprhey. They had the opportunity to spend major money on a proven, elite player in Joe Thuney. They had the opportunity to trade a first round pick for Orlando Brown Jr. They found Smith in the sixth round. We’d all love that kind of off-season for the Seahawks — but elite 20-something guards were not available, no peak-year linemen were available via trade and they’ve not had the opportunity to draft anyone yet.

Nobody should expect two home-runs like the Chiefs did with Humphrey and Smith. That’s rare. Brett Veach deserves all the credit in the world — but he’s also the GM who traded up for Patrick Mahomes. It isn’t surprising. What does emulating Veach and the Chiefs look like?

For the offensive line, it doesn’t mean forcing a pick at #18. If a lineman isn’t worth drafting in that range, it means finding the player worth having in the late second and the hidden gem on day three.

At quarterback, it means creating a good bridge (Alex Smith) and waiting for the right moment to strike on the future (Mahomes).

If anything, I think the Seahawks are following this approach.

I know what the reaction will be if they don’t take a lineman at #18. People will immediately start ranting, raving and complaining. I don’t think this will be justified.

I want to play two clips from Mike Mayock this week. Firstly, here’s a video of him discussing the receivers. He believes there are four potential first rounders. Note he included Egbuka as part of the four:

 
Then, he was asked about the offensive linemen. Without prompting he brought up the Seahawks — discussing their needs at receiver and the O-line and how they might go about addressing both. Note, he speaks about the underwhelming nature of the offensive line draft class in round one (the same thing my sources shared) and he also says the options after the top-four receivers aren’t that appealing:

 
Mayock states there are better interior options on day two and wonders whether they might go receiver first, then look at the O-line. He talks about them having the flexibility of trading up. I don’t think it’d be round one like he suggests — but round two is more likely to get a linemen they really like.

Remember a year ago? They tried to trade back into round two to get Cooper Beebe. They drafted Christian Haynes when they couldn’t. It’s entirely possible they trade to trade up from #50 this year if a plug-and-play starting left guard is within striking distance.

Or maybe they just stick and pick? The official visit of Shavon Revel Jr — a perfect scheme fit at cornerback — speaks to their willingness to possibly continue to go BPA in round two and potentially rely on the attractive offensive line options for zone-blocking later on, such as Chase Lundt.

There’s also a final point from Andrew Siciliano about the lack of commitment to Sam Darnold and how they might look to draft a quarterback, something Mayock nods along to. This is also a possible option with any of their first five picks.

This is a very interesting draft for the Seahawks. They can further shape the future under Mike Macdonald. They don’t have to force picks. They’ll be best served drafting the best players available. Fans and media will hate it. I hope that isn’t the case. This is a great opportunity to make the roster better and they deserve not to be judged after one day of the draft if they don’t take a lineman at #18.

Round one

#1 Tennessee — Cam Ward (QB, Miami)
It feels like a lock that the Titans are taking Ward.

#2 Cleveland — Abdul Carter (EDGE, Penn State)
Pairing Carter with Myles Garrett is a terrifying thought for AFC North quarterbacks.

#3 NY Giants — Travis Hunter (WR/CB, Colorado)
The Giants seem to be settling on a plan to go BPA here then assess the quarterback options later.

#4 New England — Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State)
No tackle is worth this pick. Jeanty is the pound-for-pound best player in the draft. He can take the pressure off Drake Maye.

#5 Jacksonville — Mason Graham (DT, Michigan)
It’s not a great position for the Jaguars with the three obvious ‘blue chippers’ off the board. They’d have to pick between Graham and Tyler Warren.

#6 Las Vegas — Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia)
Some people prefer Walker to Abdul Carter. He’s also a culture-setter in terms of personality and an ideal partner in crime for Maxx Crosby.

#7 NY Jets — Tyler Warren (TE, Penn State)
He just makes sense to add legit firepower to their passing game.

TRADE #8 LA Rams (v/CAR) — Jaxson Dart (QB, Ole Miss)
The Rams considered moving on from Matthew Stafford and their new arrangement feels short term. They aggressively move up to draft the future at QB in a deal costing them their 2026 first rounder.

#9 New Orleans — Jahdae Barron (CB, Texas)
He’s a terrific player and could be viewed as a lesser Devon Witherspoon.

#10 Chicago — Will Campbell (T/G, LSU)
If they’re comfortable with his arm-length, Campbell could finish off their new-look O-line.

#11 San Francisco — Armand Membou (T/G, Missouri)
He’s extremely athletic and talented but he’s not a left tackle and might be better suited at guard.

#12 Dallas — Omarion Hampton (RB, North Carolina)
Hampton has established himself as a player expected to go in the top-15.

#13 Miami — Will Johnson (CB, Michigan)
He’s one of the best players in the draft. The injuries are the only reason he won’t go in the top-10.

#14 Indianapolis — Colston Loveland (TE, Michigan)
A legit top-10 talent in this draft who only lasts due to injury. Some have him graded above Tyler Warren.

#15 Atlanta — Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina)
I’m not sure there’s a pass-rusher here who warrants the pick. Emmanwori’s testing and tape mean he could be viewed as BPA for the Falcons.

#16 Arizona — Grey Zabel (G/C, North Dakota State)
They’ve created a situation where guard is likely their draft priority and Zabel’s testing profile warrants a top-20 pick.

#17 Cincinnati — Mike Green (EDGE, Marshall)
The Bengals often ignore character flags. Green could be a terror across from Trey Hendrickson.

#18 Seattle — Emeka Egbuka (WR, Ohio State)
A quintessential Seahawks type of player and pick. High upside athleticism, exceptional character, physical and reliable. He could be BPA.

#19 Tampa Bay — Malaki Starks (S, Georgia)
As predicted he is starting to be talked about again and he’s rising up internet big boards. Starks’ combination of talent, deep-field playmaking and character will make him a coveted player.

#20 Denver — Matthew Golden (WR, Texas)
Many view Golden as the top receiver in the draft. If he lasts here the Broncos might see great value.

#21 Pittsburgh — Derrick Harmon (DT, Oregon)
They need to refresh their defensive line and Harmon is the type of player the Steelers are often drawn to.

#22 LA Chargers — Donovan Ezeiruaku (EDGE, Boston College)
Massive production, agility and length. Ezeiruaku can make plays for this defense.

#23 Green Bay — Tetairoa McMillan (WR, Arizona)
I spoke to someone who knows their stuff and he is convinced McMillan will be the top receiver taken. Naturally, I’ve made him WR3.

#24 Minnesota — Maxwell Hairston (CB, Kentucky)
I love Hairston’s control, movement skills and transition. The allegations made against him online will need to be investigated by teams.

#25 Houston — Kelvin Banks (T, Texas)
For me he’s a right tackle. I struggle to know what to make of Banks.

#26 Carolina (v/LAR) — Mykel Williams (DE, Georgia)
The Panthers trade down 18 spots and get a player who could go in the top-10 or fall into this range. Williams’ stock is impossible to project.

#27 Baltimore — Tyler Booker (G, Alabama)
This feels like an excellent plug-and-play fit for the Ravens, not to mention his playing style suits the AFC North to a tee.

#28 Detroit — Shemar Stewart (DE, Texas A&M)
The physical profile is enticing, the total lack of any production in college is not. Plenty of players like this don’t succeed.

#29 Washington — Kenneth Grant (DT, Michigan)
The Commanders take a chance on Grant who plays in flashes but left you wanting more at Michigan.

TRADE #30 NY Giants (v/BUF) — Shedeur Sanders (QB, Colorado)
The Giants move back into round one to take Sanders.

#31 Kansas City — Walter Nolen (DT, Ole Miss)
The character concerns with Nolen are legit. I also know some scouts love him, some hate him. There’s a feeling he is too inconsistent but the upside is obvious.

#32 Philadelphia — Elijah Arroyo (TE, Miami)
They’re moving on from Dallas Goedert and Arroyo is worthy of a late first round pick.

Round two

#33 Cleveland — Tyler Shough (QB,Louisville)
GM Andrew Berry recently mentioned four quarterbacks they’ve ‘zoned in on’. Shough wasn’t mentioned. Which either means this is a stupid prediction or there’s misdirection going on.

#34 Buffalo (v/NYG) — Tyleik Williams (DT, Ohio State)
The Bills need someone who can play one-tech. They move down and acquire a player with a lot of upside and plug-and-play ability.

#35 Tennessee — Luther Burden (WR, Missouri)
They have hardly any weapons and need more at receiver.

#36 Jacksonville — Mason Taylor (TE, LSU)
Taylor has only scratched the surface of his potential so far.

#37 Las Vegas — Jihaad Campbell (LB, Alabama)
I’m a huge fan of Campbell. He’s a top-10 talent in this class. Yet the labrum injury could push him into day two.

#38 New England — Josh Simmons (T, Ohio State)
They address their gaping need at left tackle with arguably most the talented one in the draft. Injury recovery and character concerns keep him on the board.

#39 Chicago (v/CAR) — TreVeyon Henderson (RB, Ohio State)
Henderson is a perfect weapon for Ben Johnson’s offense.

#40 New Orleans — Trey Amos (CB, Ole Miss)
They need to replenish the stock at cornerback.

TRADE #41 Seattle (v/CHI) — Donovan Jackson (G, Ohio State)
The Seahawks don’t hang about to address their biggest need. They move up nine spots to go and get Jackson, who won’t make it to #50.

#42 NY Jets — Will Howard (QB, Ohio State)
There’s a feeling Howard is locked into a round two placing. The Jets feel like a very plausible option for him.

#43 San Francisco — Azareye’h Thomas (CB, Florida State)
They need a lot of things on defense after losing so much talent, including a starting cornerback.

#44 Dallas — Saivion Williams (WR, TCU)
They can use him as a multi-faceted weapon. It feels like the Cowboys are going to focus on adding firepower.

#45 Indianapolis — Carson Schwesinger (LB, UCLA)
A quality testing session this week cements his place in the top-50.

#46 Atlanta — Bradyn Swinson (EDGE, LSU)
He’s such a good player and continues to be slept on. This would be a home-run pick.

#47 Arizona — James Pearce Jr (EDGE, Tennessee)
Part of me wonders if the character concerns could push Pearce Jr deeper into day two.

#48 Miami — Josh Conerly (T, Oregon)
Some people really like him. There are moments on tape where you see quality. I just look at the body type, though, and wonder how many starting left tackles look like him?

#49 Cincinnati — Tate Ratledge (G, Georgia)
Perfect fit for a number of reasons and a player who addresses a big need.

#50 Chicago (v/SEA) — Landon Jackson (DE, Arkansas)
After adding two offensive players with their first two selections, now the Bears go after pass-rush help.

#51 Denver — Darius Alexander (DT, Toledo)
I’ve got the Broncos taking DJ Giddens in round three to fill their running back need. So they add to their D-line here instead.

TRADE #52 Buffalo (v/SEA, PIT) — Benjamin Morrison (CB, Notre Dame)
It’s critical the Bills draft a cornerback, so they jump above the Buccs in a deal with the Seahawks to secure Morrison.

#53 Tampa Bay — Danny Stutsman (LB, Oklahoma)
Lavonte David can’t play forever and Stutsman can be the man to take over long term.

#54 Green Bay — Alfred Collins (DT, Texas)
Some people really like Collins but a disappointing pre-draft process surely impacts his stock?

#55 LA Chargers — Quinshon Judkins (RB, Ohio State)
Jim Harbaugh wants to run the football.

#56 Buffalo (v/MIN) — Oluwafemi Oladejo (EDGE, UCLA)
‘The Mayor’ finds a home in Buffalo.

#57 Carolina (v/LAR) — Isaiah Bond (WR, Texas)
I think he’s fools gold but there appears to be people who believe in him.

#58 Houston — Jayden Higgins (WR, Iowa State)
The Texans keep adding weapons for CJ Stroud.

#59 Baltimore — Xavier Watts (S, Notre Dame)
They need to draft a safety.

#60 Detroit — Ty Robinson (DT, Nebraska)
He plays like a Detroit Lion.

#61 Washington — Jack Bech (WR, TCU)
They still need more at receiver and Bech would complement their other targets nicely. He’s a quality player.

#62 Seattle (v/BUF) — Josaiah Stewart (EDGE, Michigan)
Wink Martindale loves Stewart. Mike Macdonald is a Martindale protégé. He would add further juice to Seattle’s pass-rush.

#63 Kansas City — Jonah Savaiinaea (T/G, Arizona)
I don’t think he’s aggressive enough and he doesn’t finish. But some like him more than I do.

#64 Philadelphia — Shemar Turner (DT, Texas A&M)
The kind of defensive lineman you can easily see fitting into Philly’s rotation.

The trades explained

Seahawks give Bears 50 & 92 for 41 and 148
Rather than reach for need at #18, the Seahawks take best player available in round one then trade up from to get an immediate starter at guard that they like in a range that feels right. The price of swapping a late third rounder for a mid-fifth rounder doesn’t seem unreasonable to come away with two quality impact players with your first two picks. Chicago might be open-minded about this kind of deal given they don’t own a fourth round pick.

Bills give Seahawks 62 & 109 for 52
After trading up from #50, the Seahawks now move back from #52. They know they can get the player they want in this scenario with a small drop, so take Buffalo’s early fourth rounder. It makes up for trading away #92 to the Bears. The two trades basically see the Seahawks manipulating the board to get the players they really want.

The picks explained

I’m not going to go over old ground with Egbuka or the trade proposal because we discussed them already in detail this week. I want to take a bit of time to pitch a few thoughts instead:

1. People will hate a receiver pick at #18. However, if they made these moves, I suspect fans would embrace and understand the logic. Grey Zabel is not available at #18. None of the other linemen taken after in round one are obvious fits. You still come out of the draft with a top-end guard and a weapon you like. Let’s put it this way — if they take a guard at #18 and then move up to get a must-have offensive weapon in round two, I think most people would applaud. There’s no difference here.

2. Emeka Egbuka is not a reach at #18. Daniel Jeremiah ranks him 17th. Mel Kiper ranks him 18th. It’s fair value.

3. The mock shows what I think could well be a cluster of players on Seattle’s radar:

14 Indianapolis — Colston Loveland (TE, Michigan)
#15 Atlanta — Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina)
#16 Arizona — Grey Zabel (G/C, North Dakota State)
#17 Cincinnati — Mike Green (EDGE, Marshall)
#18 Seattle — Emeka Egbuka (WR, Ohio State)
#19 Tampa Bay — Malaki Starks (S, Georgia)
#20 Denver — Matthew Golden (WR, Texas)

There’s very little chance of them taking Green based on character question marks. The other six players all tick most of the boxes the Seahawks look for. I’m mocking Egbuka here but it’s eminently possible they could have Starks or Golden graded higher.

4. Egbuka, Donovan Jackson and Josaiah Stewart just feel like Seahawks. Their attitude, performance, reliability and ability to start quickly. Predicting what a team will do is hard enough as it is without throwing in a couple of trades. However, even if this ultimately proves to be miles off reality, it at least feels on April 3rd like a plausible projection. You can see them doing this.

5. The Seahawks can add competition to the offensive line beyond simply drafting Donovan Jackson. Here are the players who graded well as zone blockers in 2024. Many of these prospects will be available from round three onwards:

Charles Grant — 93.0
Willie Lampkin — 90.4
Wyatt Milum — 90.0
Chase Lundt — 88.2
Armand Membou — 87.4
Jack Nelson — 86.4
Logan Brown — 85.2
Clay Webb — 84.9
Grey Zabel —- 84.8
Cam Williams — 84.0
Kelvin Banks Jr — 81.5
Hollin Pierce — 81.5
Marcus Mbow — 81.3
Connor Colby — 81.3
Bryce Cabeldue — 81.0

I am not concerned about Seattle’s ability to improve their line. I expect they will be able to achieve this via drafting and better coaching. I also don’t think it’s realistic to expect the Seahawks to find cast-iron solutions for three interior positions in one off-season. The chances are they will draft a starting left guard who will be anointed the starter. Then, they will possibly draft competition at center and right guard — while working to improve the players added over the last two off-seasons.

It’s also important to continue to develop Charles Cross and Abe Lucas.

For me this is a two-year project, not a one-draft fix. We all want to see immediate improvement. I’m not against drafting Grey Zabel at #18 and Tate Ratledge at #50 and feeling like a major statement has been made. I’m just not sure those players will be available or that it’s realistic to expect this.

6. I continue to wonder if Tyler Booker would be an alternative trade-up target if he lasts into round two. He’s not an obvious scheme fit but he’s the kind of tone-setter they need up front. He is mobile, he’s just not quick. He is highly aggressive. I’ll keep using the Aaron Banks/Kyle Shanahan/Matt LaFleur line for justifying continuing to talk about Booker.

7. If I was doing a full seven-round projection, I would have them taking a quarterback at some point.

8. I am optimistic about this draft for Seattle and how it can further shape the roster.

— Yesterday I pitched an idea where the Seahawks went BPA at #18 and then traded up from #50 to address their offensive line need, moving to #41 to get Donovan Jackson. It might be worth keeping an eye on Tyler Booker in this scenario too. He might not be an ideal zone blocker but, again, neither was Aaron Banks, who was drafted 48th overall by Kyle Shanahan and recently signed a $19.25m-a-year contract to play for Matt LaFleur.

None of Mel Kiper, Todd McShay or Daniel Jeremiah had Booker in the first round of their latest mock drafts. If he lasts to day two, he could be a target. He’s a good football player, can start immediately and his physicality and personality perfectly fit what the Seahawks crave. It would feel a little bit like when they moved up to get Jarran Reed in 2016.

Let’s also be clear. Booker’s testing was bad. He lacks foot-speed and quickness on the run. That’s the issue, not that he’s immobile. He’s a very capable puller and he showed during the on-field combine drills that he can move around with ease despite his size. His frame is in proportion for such a big human, which isn’t typical.

It’s just something to keep in mind. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if pick #18 isn’t an offensive lineman and they then move up from #50 to address their biggest need with a quality addition — such as Booker or Jackson.

— If they do take an offensive lineman at #18, such as Grey Zabel, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them move up from #50 to get Elijah Arroyo. Seattle’s offensive scheme is perfect for a dynamic pass-catching tight end. Arroyo is another excellent fit for the mentality of this team. Some think he is worthy of a late first-round pick and I agree. If he’s there in the 30’s or 40’s, he could be a target.

— I promise I don’t set out to keep repeating myself, but I do think there’s a strong possibility Emeka Egbuka will be the pick at #18. I’ve explained why in detail and the main basis for this is understanding, through sources, just how much Egbuka the person fits the Seahawks. Forget his position. Just focus on the individual. Everything about him — talent, physicality, upside, leadership, reliability — screams Seahawks.

It was with great interest then that I noticed two things. Firstly, Daniel Jeremiah recently moved Egbuka from 23rd to 17th on his top-50 list. Then, Mel Kiper moved him from 24th to 18th on his big board. They mentioned “rave reviews from NFL teams” and that “he’s NFL-ready and coaches will love him. He’s a grinder who can make plays and pick up first downs when they are needed most.”

For anyone thinking he’d be a reach at #18 — 17th and 18th on two prominent big boards suggests otherwise.

There are several players who tick every box the Seahawks seem to look for these days in terms of talent, production, reliability, high football character and physical upside. Some, like Jahdae Barron and Malaki Starks, might not make it to #18. Ditto Colston Loveland. I’m not sure Grey Zabel will make it to #18 any more.

Even if some of these players are available, Egbuka might still be their guy. The good news is they’re very likely to get someone they like in round one. Matthew Golden, Nick Emmanwori and Donovan Ezeiruaku also feel like personality/talent/scheme fits. I keep going back and forth on Kelvin Banks Jr.

Just don’t be shocked if you hear Egbuka’s name called at #18.

— I still think they’re going to take a quarterback. I don’t know when. Nothing would shock me. But I will be surprised if they get through all seven rounds and one hasn’t been taken. I’m fascinated to see if there’s a firm target or a plan in place to come away with a certain player. I think they will add to this room though.

— The pick at #52 fascinates me. This could also be a selection where they just take someone they love and the internet has a mini-meltdown (unless it’s an offensive lineman). It could be a quarterback pick. I can easily see them going for a player who just ‘fits’ the personality/style they want at a position most don’t see as a key need.

It could be Danny Stutsman the Oklahoma linebacker, who absolutely plays to the style of defense Mike Macdonald is establishing. Linebacker isn’t a huge need but we saw the importance of it in this scheme a year ago. They haven’t added anything to the group in free agency. If they like Stutsman — and I think they might — they could take him and let him compete with Tyrice Knight. Depth at that spot is hardly a problem. I also wouldn’t count out Carson Schwesinger or Demetrius Knight.

Jared Wilson’s testing is very similar to Erik McCoy’s, New Orleans’ center who excelled under Klint Kubiak last season. Bradyn Swinson, if he’s available, would be a tremendous selection to add to their pass-rush depth (although they might be eyeing Josaiah Stewart in round three). It could be Ty Robinson, who I’ve discussed a lot, or any other defensive tackle in a loaded class at the position. Joshua Farmer perhaps, who bullied opponents in front of Mike Macdonald at the Senior Bowl.

This is what makes this draft so interesting and why it’s great to have five picks to play with in the top-100. They can be aggressive if they want. They can get potential starters going into round three. They can also address key needs without moving off a ‘value first’ approach rather than forcing anything. This is a big opportunity for the franchise.

— Will Howard is going to go earlier than people realise. I think there are teams in round two who will take him. Possibly the Browns, Jets or Raiders. Speaking to someone who knows what he’s talking about last week, it was put to me that it’s not beyond the realms of possibility someone trades into the late first for him. Whether that happens or not remains to be seen but the second round feels like Howard’s likely destination.

It’s not a surprise either. He’s a good football player. His QBR average in the four playoff games was a near perfect 96.4, while his NFL passer rating was 126.8. Ohio State also had exactly 50% conversions on third downs in the playoffs. When the games mattered the most, Howard delivered — and this all came after bouncing back from the setback against Michigan.

He might not have the highest ceiling in the world but teams will think a year or two down the line, he can provide competent play under center. I also know people who’ve been around Howard who speak incredibly highly of him and there’s a sense he might be the most prepared to come into the NFL within this quarterback class.

— In the last week I’ve heard positive things about players I don’t rate very highly. This includes Cam Williams, Wyatt Milum, Jonah Savanaaia, Jonah Monheim and Deone Walker. I am in the process of watching them again while being mindful not to course-correct and look too hard for things I “missed”. That said, I wanted to note their names in this article. It’s important to share the views of people I respect greatly that differ from my own.

— I’m in Sweden this week but will be doing my usual Puck Sports slot today. I’ll add it at the top of this article later.

The main topic on the blog for the last few days has been the possibility of the Seahawks taking Emeka Egbuka in the first round. If you missed yesterday’s article, check it out here.

One of the fears of such a pick is that they wouldn’t have appropriately addressed the offensive line. I wanted to look at a way that can still be achieved.

Let’s imagine a first round like the one below. Note, I am reflecting on how the league is viewing the defensive tackle position in this draft, where we could see many going in the first two days (and in some cases, earlier than people think):

#1 Tennessee — Cam Ward (QB, Miami)
#2 Cleveland — Abdul Carter (EDGE, Penn State)
#3 NY Giants — Travis Hunter (WR/CB, Colorado)
#4 New England — Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State)
#5 Jacksonville — Mason Graham (DT, Michigan)
#6 Las Vegas — Armand Membou (T/G, Missouri)
#7 NY Jets — Tyler Warren (TE, Penn State)
#8 Carolina — Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia)
#9 New Orleans — Jahdae Barron (CB, Texas)
#10 Chicago — Colston Loveland (TE, Michigan)
#11 San Francisco — Will Campbell (T/G, LSU)
#12 Dallas — Matthew Golden (WR, Texas)
#13 Miami — Malaki Starks (S, Georgia)
#14 Indianapolis — Grey Zabel (G/C, North Dakota State)
#15 Atlanta — Mykel Williams (DE, Georgia)
#16 Arizona — Will Johnson (CB, Michigan)
#17 Cincinnati — Mike Green (EDGE, Marshall)
#18 Seattle — Emeka Egbuka (WR, Ohio State)
#19 Tampa Bay — Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina)
#20 Denver — Tetairoa McMillan (WR, Arizona)
#21 Pittsburgh — Omarion Hampton (RB, North Carolina)
#22 NY Giants (v/LAC) — Shedeur Sanders (QB, Colorado)
#23 Green Bay — Maxwell Hairston (CB, Kentucky)
#24 Minnesota — Walter Nolen (DT, Ole Miss)
#25 Houston — Kelvin Banks (T, Texas)
#26 LA Rams — Jaxson Dart (QB, Ole Miss)
#27 Baltimore — Tyler Booker (G, Alabama)
#28 Detroit — Donovan Ezeiruaku (EDGE, Boston College)
#29 Washington — Shemar Stewart (DE, Texas A&M)
#30 Buffalo — Derrick Harmon (DT, Oregon)
#31 Kansas City — Kenneth Grant (DT, Michigan)
#32 Philadelphia — Elijah Arroyo (TE, Miami)

As you can see, Grey Zabel is off the board. I don’t think this is unrealistic. In this situation, the Seahawks might be forced to look elsewhere.

So what do they do?

#33 Cleveland — Tyler Shough (QB,Louisville)
#34 LA Chargers (v/NYG) — TreVeyon Henderson (RB, Ohio State)
#35 Tennessee — Luther Burden (WR, Missouri)
#36 Jacksonville — Mason Taylor (TE, LSU)
#37 Las Vegas — Jihaad Campbell (LB, Alabama)
#38 New England — Josh Simmons (T, Ohio State)
#39 Chicago (v/CAR) — Tyleik Williams (DT, Ohio State)
#40 New Orleans — Josh Conerly (T, Oregon)
#41 Seattle (v/CHI) — Donovan Jackson (G, Ohio State)
#42 NY Jets — Will Howard (QB, Ohio State)
#43 San Francisco — Alfred Collins (DT, Texas)
#44 Dallas — Quinshon Judkins (RB, Ohio State)
#45 Indianapolis — Carson Schwesinger (LB, UCLA)
#46 Atlanta — Azareye’h Thomas (CB, Florida State)
#47 Arizona — Bradyn Swinson (EDGE, LSU)
#48 Miami — Darius Alexander (DT, Toledo)
#49 Cincinnati — Tate Ratledge (G, Georgia)
#50 Chicago (v/SEA) — Oluwafemi Oladejo (EDGE, UCLA)

In this scenario, the Seahawks trade up from #50, giving the Bears #50 & #92 in exchange for #41 & #148. It allows them to move up and select Donovan Jackson.

I don’t think this is unrealistic. Such a scenario would allow them to take a non-offensive lineman at #18, which might be their preference based on a ‘best player available’ approach.

Selecting Egbuka at #18 would be less about the position he plays and more about the person. Egbuka is the quintessential Seahawks pick. He was ‘the man’ at Ohio State who everyone looked up to. His maturity, leadership and competitive drive is top-level. He is a great scheme fit and his reliability on and off the field will replace the void left by Tyler Lockett. He’s also productive, physical, a winner and his testing creates a perfectly high ceiling and floor. Some believe he can be Amon-Ra St. Brown at the next level.

Look at it this way. Lockett had a 10-year career in Seattle. If the Seahawks had used a top-20 pick on him, nobody would’ve complained — irrespective of needs elsewhere. It’s not beyond the realms of possibility the Seahawks look at Egbuka and see someone capable of having an equally long and productive career, with the ability to help shape the mentality of the roster for years.

Then they make an aggressive move to add a plug-and-play starter at left guard. Jackson is well liked within the league and would give the Seahawks an impact lineman at a position of serious need. This kind of plan would enable them to add two highly regarded prospects who can contribute immediately. You can easily argue it would be worth swapping a late third for a fifth rounder to make this move. Chicago might be a willing trade partner because they don’t own a fourth round pick.

If you wanted to, you might be able to move back from #52 to gain extra stock. Or you can just pick again in round two. Having four day two picks creates an opportunity to be aggressive. I wouldn’t just assume it’d be for an offensive lineman either. I could also imagine them making a similar move to try and get Elijah Arroyo if he lasted into range.

I’m not going to spend the next three weeks just talking about Egbuka at #18. I do think, however, it’s an angle that warrants serious thought. I think it’s justifiable too — especially if you can still come away with a guard such as Jackson.

The more you think about it, the more it makes sense right? Get the top player on your board at #18. Then go and get the lineman you want in the range you’re comfortable taking them.

Earlier this week I was invited on the Hawkzone Rundown podcast. If you missed it, check it out here:

Ever since the DK Metcalf trade I’ve been pushing back on mock drafts pairing the Seahawks with a receiver.

They won’t do that! It’s lazy! Have they not heard what they’ve said about the kind of team they want to build!?

Some of that remains true. I do think there’s minimal thought going into those mocks. ‘Replace Metcalf’ will be the prevailing thought. That isn’t going to be their mentality and they’ll only take a receiver if the value matches up.

However, I need to course-correct on my initial stance on a receiver at #18. From conversations I’ve had with people who, let’s just say, ‘know their stuff’, in the last few days — clearly there’s a receiver many of us have been underestimating.

Ohio State’s Emeka Egbuka is loved within league circles.

The general perception online seems to be that he’s a fairly unspectacular #2. Speaking to people in the league in the last few days, I can tell you the feeling in the NFL is very different.

One source told me he was ‘the guy‘ at Ohio State. The person everyone looked up to, who best exemplified the competitive spirit that helped the Buckeyes win a National Championship. That’s on a roster that included Jack Sawyer, JT Tuimoloau, Will Howard, Tyleik Williams, Lathan Ransom, Quinshon Judkins, TreVeyon Henderson and future high picks like Jeremiah Smith and Caleb Downs. He’s the one people came to for advice. He set the tone.

His interviews have gone down a storm and he is seen as a gritty, mature presence who already commands himself like a league veteran.

Physically he has far more upside than people realise. He ran a forty in the 4.4’s and jumped a 38-inch vertical. I’m told he won most of the 1v1 basketball games at Ohio State.

People in the league feel he is a good combination of decent ceiling and high floor, someone who can be a reliable production machine at the next level and add a lot to your locker room. It speaks to his physical demeanour that he’s committed to blocking duties and excels.

I was told he’ll be a first round pick.

The player comp? Potentially, Amon-Ra St. Brown. Others have suggested Chris Godwin. Some think that while he isn’t quite as good coming into the league as former Ohio State team-mates Marvin Harrison Jr and Garrett Wilson, he is superior to Chris Olave and Jaxon Smith-Njigba.

This is all information worth taking on board. Adding another receiver isn’t Seattle’s greatest need. That’s the offensive line, obviously. But Egbuka ticks so many boxes for the Seahawks. Character, reliability, physical upside, production. He’s their type of guy.

They’ve also put a lot of emphasis on ‘wanting to be here’ after DK Metcalf effectively forced his way off the team. Geno Smith seemingly wanted out too due to his huge salary demands. The Raiders have so far not been able to agree a deal with him either. It didn’t take the Seahawks long to re-assign their jersey numbers to Sam Darnold and Uchenna Nwosu.

Egbuka, originally from Steilacoom, is a self-confessed “huge Seahawks fan” who grew up following the team.

It’s possible he’ll be on a short-list of very viable targets at #18.

Daniel Jeremiah is clearly hearing similar things. He moved Egbuka up six spots in his latest top-50 board to 17th overall. If you put any faith in Jeremiah’s rankings, taking him at #18 will not be a reach.

This line chimes with what I heard:

“He’s earned rave reviews from NFL teams for the knowledge and leadership he’s shown when they meet with him.”

You might ask, do they need another receiver like this? I think it’s important to remember that the Seahawks are now running the Shanahan offense. Look at the receivers San Francisco have had in recent years. Brandon Aiyuk, Jacob Cowing, Ricky Pearsall, Deebo Samuel. None of them are DK Metcalf type size/speed types. They have Jauan Jennings to offer some size but he ran a 4.72 forty at his combine.

The LA Rams meanwhile, who run the same system, excelled with Cooper Kupp and Puca Nacua.

If the Seahawks are going down this route, they are far more likely to draft someone like Egbuka to pair with Smith-Njiba than try and find a direct Metcalf replacement. I would also suggest there’s likely to be a lot of emphasis placed on finding a dynamic receiving tight end — which is why I think Elijah Arroyo will be strongly on their radar.

The other thing to consider is just how respected and valued Tyler Lockett was in Seattle. They loved his reliability and attitude. I think it’s totally plausible they’ll see some of him in Egbuka in terms of the personality, professionalism and ability to make critical plays in big moments.

Cooper Kupp is a short-term signing and might only last a year. Nothing about his addition stops them from drafting Egbuka if that’s the direction they want to take.

It was interesting last week that Tony Pauline passed on thoughts within the league that Egbuka would go in the middle part of round one, with a run on receivers starting with the Seahawks at #18.

Again, I appreciate Tony passes on a lot of rumours and some clearly some don’t hit. I will remind people, though, that he correctly said a year ago that Byron Murphy was the guy they wanted (but they didn’t think he’d last) and he was also the first person to say, in an interview with SDB, that there were concerns over Troy Fautanu’s knee. Nobody else had that before Tony. It kept him out for his entire rookie season. It was spot-on information.

It doesn’t mean Tony will be right about this. Yet it’s something else to consider when weighing up whether Egbuka will go earlier than expected and that the Seahawks might be the ones to take him.

Clearly he’s not the only option. I’ve written similar things about Malaki Starks’ combination of talent, maturity and character. He feels like a strong alternative. Ditto Grey Zabel. I can well imagine them having interest in Colston Loveland (but don’t expect there’s any chance he will last to #18). Jahdae Barron and Donovan Ezeiruakun also feel like Seahawks and they’re clearly at least intrigued by Nick Emmanwori — who comes across well when he speaks.

Just don’t be surprised if they take Egbuka in round one. He’s like a lot of their recent first round picks. They would then have to address the O-line on day two but good options exist and they have four picks.

It’s also worth saying that they might be forced to look at other areas at #18. There’s no guarantee Zabel lasts to the Seahawks. His tape is very good. His character is excellent. His testing shows an athlete as explosive as Tristan Wirfs and as nimble as Nate Solder. He is worthy of a top-20 pick. It’s possible the Dolphins, Colts, Cardinals and Bengals take him off the board.

I don’t think any other O-liner at #18 necessarily fits what they’re looking for in terms of physical upside, character and scheme (as much as I like Tyler Booker). They might be forced to look at other positions. Seeking value though, rather than forcing anything, will be the order of the day.

For more on Egbuka and other things I’ve heard about the NFL draft, check out the video below:

We’ve talked a lot recently about potential non-O-line options for the Seahawks at #18. Whether people want to embrace it or not, the Seahawks have operated with a firm ‘stick to the board’ plan in recent drafts. That likely isn’t going to change in 2025.

We’ve discussed Malaki Starks, Emeka Egbuka and Tyler Shough recently — three players with the character and physical tools to potentially interest Seattle. We know Nick Emmanwori is having an official-30 visit. Matthew Golden, Donovan Ezeiruaku, Jaxson Dart and others also shouldn’t just be ruled out completely.

Today though I want to discuss the possibility of a firm assault on the interior O-line, which is also a possibility.

Clearly the Seahawks like the offensive linemen in this draft. They kept out of a bad veteran market with the view the rookies would provide greater potential to produce a great line in the future.

I don’t think it’s out of the question that two of their first three picks go on offensive linemen.

I know someone will respond noting that the team has spoken about having belief in the guys already on the roster. Let’s be clear — they have to say this. The players on the roster have effectively become Seattle’s draft hedge. You can’t predict a draft perfectly and they have to speak about faith in the existing group because they might need those guys.

This doesn’t mean they aren’t fully aware of the need for rapid and emphatic improvement.

There might be a fresh starts for a player like Christian Haynes. I don’t think though, in any way, shape or form, he is being handed a starting job. I doubt they will invest much belief in Anthony Bradford being an option. Sataoa Laumea was a sixth round pick. The truth is he might not even be on the roster next season.

There is no commitment to former fifth rounder Olu Oluwatimi or UDFA Jalen Sundell. This doesn’t mean they’re not-for-long in Seattle — it just means there’s nothing to lock their roster spots in place or feel like the Seahawks have to avoid certain decisions in the upcoming draft.

If they can upgrade any of the interior spots next month, they will do.

They’re also probably well aware that Philadelphia’s talented O-line features two players drafted a year apart with the 37th pick (Landon Dickerson) and 51st pick (Cam Jurgens). The Seahawks need that kind of double-dip.

They have the stock this year to binge on the O-line if they want to and still address other areas. In part, I think this is one of the reasons why they acquired the stock they did. To address the offensive line issue and then other areas too.

I’m increasingly convinced there’s going to be a big ring around the name of Grey Zabel as a legit option at #18. Having already jumped a 36.5 inch vertical at the combine (third best by a lineman since 2003) he’s now added an elite short shuttle. You can watch it here. I’ve tried to time it but the angle is difficult to see when he crosses the finish line. However, I’d estimate his run is in the 4.3’s and is probably a 4.40 at worst.

That puts him in the same company as former first round picks like Nate Solder (4.34), Jordan Gross (4.34), Nick Mangold (4.36), Robert Gallery (4.38) and if you want to extend this to the 33rd pick, Eric Steinbach (4.37).

Zabel has a 3.23 TEF score and he’s a 100.8 in weighted TEF (I will post the data for all linemen soon). He’s the ideal combination of explosive traits and agility and has the profile of a first round prospect with the chance to develop into a top pro.

We’re talking about a player with top level upside for an offensive lineman with excellent tape, an aggressive playing style and clear evidence of performing at a high level in a zone-blocking system. He is a legit top-22 pick in this draft, will not be a reach at #18 and the only concern now has to be that he even lasts to #18 at all.

Character-wise he’s also a great fit. Here’s what Bob McGinn’s sources say about Zabel:

“He’s what you would expect from North Dakota State: tough, physical, friggin’ blue-collar brawler. Very smart. Instincts and reactions are very good. Played pretty good on the move. Good bender. At the Senior Bowl, the practices were better than the game. Real-deal interview. Loved the interview.”

If he’s there at #18, I’m guessing he’ll be the pick. Either to play guard or center. I prefer him at guard but others think center. Zabel has an opportunity to quickly emerge as one of the best interior offensive linemen in the NFL.

If he isn’t there at #18 (and get ready for this being more of a possibility than some people realise) I don’t think they’ll simply pivot to the next lineman. That’s when other positions can come into play.

Zabel would fill one position. Then you’d move on to #50 and #52. Again, I don’t think the Seahawks will be thinking about Oluwatimi or Haynes when they’re on the clock. If their board has a lineman providing good value in those spots and if they believe they can become a long term starter, they’ll be on the radar.

I put out this tweet after the combine:

How would #Seahawks fans feel if the team drafted Grey Zabel and Tate Ratledge with their first two picks and signed the experienced Ryan Kelly to play center?

— Rob Staton (@robstaton) March 2, 2025

Obviously they didn’t sign Ryan Kelly in the end. Could they still take Ratledge at #50 or #52 and insert him at right guard?

He has the physical profile to justify it. He scored a 3.10 in TEF with an excellent testing session at the combine. He ran a 7.38 three-cone — the 11th best time by an offensive lineman since 2003. In terms of pure upside and physical potential he’s another top-tier prospect.

His tape is aggressive and physical. Bob McGinn’s scouting sources note this about Ratledge:

“High football intelligence, son of a coach. He was important to them from a locker-room perspective and the mentality that he is as a true talent. Even when he was banged up this year he was such an important part of that offensive line. He does have a real nasty streak.”

On tape there’s not a ton of great evidence of him excelling as a zone-blocker. Despite his athleticism he was used as more of a phone-booth guy at Georgia. That might be more to do with their scheme given his excellent athletic traits, including a 4.97 forty yard dash. It’s worth noting though, as is his recent injury history (he missed most of the 2024 season).

Both Zabel and Ratledge have the feel of Eagles-style linemen. If you draft them you’re getting toughness. You’re getting an edge. You’re getting elite-level athletes for the position. With the greatest respect to Christian Haynes, he simply doesn’t have Ratledge’s physical profile and body type.

You will win a lot of football games with players like Zabel and Ratledge in the trenches. This is the way Seattle can revamp their line and set things up for years to come, establishing the identity they crave.

I’d even go a step further. I’d be prepared to draft another lineman. If they want to put Zabel at center, go and get Chase Lundt to play guard. If you had Lundt, Zabel and Ratledge as your interior — that would have the potential to be the most physically violent trio in the NFL. Charles Grant is another strong option. If you want to use Zabel at guard, I’d even be open-minded on using all three of your first picks on the line. That could mean drafting Jared Wilson or Marcus Mbow to play center.

Don’t say this is too much. Do you want to fix the line or not? All of the players listed above are better than anything currently on the roster. Even if you used #18, #50 and #52 on the line — you’d still have two third round picks, a fourth rounder and two fifth’s. You have flexibility.

What is perhaps more likely is one center pick early, one guard pick early and then another addition later on. This is why I’m not panicking about free agency. The options in this draft are so intriguing, there is a chance to build the line of fans’ dreams. I do think, if possible, they’re going to lean into this to try and create something special.

There really was no need for silly tweets about ‘adjunct’ failures if the Seahawks didn’t sign Teven Jenkins or Mekhi Becton. They were never going to be the answer. The players in this draft can be.

A lot of mocks have the Seahawks taking a receiver at #18.

I’m not sold. I’ll explain why, then discuss why it might happen anyway.

The first reason why I’m not convinced is the way the Seahawks say they want to build their team. They’ve talked about being aggressive, physical and trenches-focused. It makes you think they’re more likely to adopt Jim Harbaugh’s ‘over my dead body’ approach to picking receivers before linemen.

Like the Chargers last year, taking a receiver on day two seems to make more sense. Let’s not forget, they’ve already invested a high pick on Jaxon Smith-Njigba. Do they really need two?

The second reason involves the players being discussed. I think Matthew Golden is WR1 but he isn’t a home-run pick. I suspect he will be off the board before #18 because the Cowboys seem hell-bent on drafting a receiver in round one and Golden is the best available.

I don’t think Tetairoa McMillan is worth #18 in the slightest. There’s also an issue of personality fit.

For the last few years we’ve talked about the Seahawks doubling down on character. It’s why they were never going to draft Jalen Carter, despite his talent. It’s why they’ve focused on people like Devon Witherspoon, Byron Murphy, Boye Mafe, Derick Hall and Smith-Njigba. Character and reliability is a big part of their process.

Here are quotes from anonymous scouting sources, per Bob McGinn, about McMillian:

“He was in protection mode this year. There’s stuff on film this year that’s just gross. The lack of competitiveness is just disturbing at times. Very undisciplined route runner. Big-play potential but too many times it didn’t happen. Not overly physical for a big guy but he’s got natural ball skills. His feet are awesome for a 6-4 dude. He’s a real smooth operator. He’s slippery in run-after-the-catch and he’s got pretty good speed. It’s just, which guy are you going to get? He’s a really immature kid. He’s a poster child for this NIL shit. They kiss his ass to get him to stay and then they do what they want.”

You don’t have to take this as gospel but it’s not exactly the description of a player the Seahawks have taken early in recent drafts. Based on what John Schneider said on Seattle Sports yesterday, I can’t imagine this kind of review — if accurate — is going to have him rushing to pick McMillan.

Golden gets a far more positive review:

“He is a great kid and he could rise because of who he is.”

Out of the two, Golden is more likely to be on Seattle’s radar if they believe in the player and the person. Like I said though, I don’t think he’ll be available.

It all just seems a little bit lazy to me. The Seahawks traded away DK Metcalf, therefore they’ll use their top pick on a pass-catcher.

If they trade down first, I think it’s more likely. Moving down the board for extra day-two stock would be appealing. Recently Todd McShay pitched a trade with the Giants moving up to #19, giving the Buccs the 65th pick and a 2026 third rounder in return.

I think that would be an attractive move for Seattle too. The Giants have potentially set themselves up to attack a plan like this. By signing Russell Wilson, they are at least somewhat covered. They can take Travis Hunter (or Abdul Carter) at #3. They can then try to trade up from #34 to get a quarterback, possibly Shedeur Sanders or Jaxson Dart, jumping the Steelers at #21.

Deion Sanders, who once touted the possibility of picking his son’s eventual NFL destination, today said he’s happy for Shedeur to go to ‘any of the teams needing a quarterback’. That’s the biggest hint yet that Shedeur is not going to be taken in the top-three picks.

If the Seahawks were to move down to #34, while gaining pick #65, this could bring a receiver into play. They might prefer to target Mason Taylor or Elijah Arroyo at tight end instead — but there is a receiver I do think they’ll like.

Emeka Egbuka is exactly the type of character they want. He’s been a consistent target for Ohio State. He grew up a huge Seahawks fan and adding players ‘who want to be here’ seems to be a focus for Seattle at the moment.

There was a question mark about his athletic testing. He ran in the 4.4’s at his pro-day and jumped a 38-inch vertical. That answered any of those questions.

Nobody expects Egbuka to be a big-time X-factor in the NFL. I do think you’re going to get a lot of consistent production though — particularly on third downs and key moments. He’s also physical and gritty with a high football IQ. Egbuka might be a receiver but he’s tough. The kind of tough Seattle seems to want. We’ve seen these types of player excel in San Francisco and LA. He could be a long-term replacement for Cooper Kupp, acting initially as the #3 receiver.

You might say, ‘why would they want another player who operates in a similar way to Smith-Njigba?’ I suppose you could say the signing of Kupp is evidence they don’t mind having multiple versions of this type of player. They have plenty of picks to add some deep speed later on and might feel they already have it in Marquez Valdez-Scantling.

Whether people like Seattle’s approach or not — this is the type of player they’ve drafted in recent years.

Could they take him even without a trade-down? There are two things to consider.

Firstly, it’s the BPA approach. Egbuka is 26th on Todd McShay’s big board ahead of Zabel (#33) and Malaki Starks (#34),

Lance Zierlein gave Egbuka a 6.37 grade. That’s better than Zabel (6.34), Kenneth Grant (6.36), Jihaad Campbell (6.34), Starks (6.34), Omarion Hampton (6.33) and Shedeur Sanders (6.30).

Based on my own rankings, I think he is the second best receiver in the draft behind Golden and worthy of being considered between the 16th and 23rd best player in the draft. You can view my horizontal board here.

It’s not that unrealistic to imagine the Seahawks have Egbuka ahead of some other popular alternatives. It’s not necessarily what I would do — but as with the Tyler Shough article yesterday, I wouldn’t rule anything out.

Secondly, there’s this from Tony Pauline today:

“People at the (Ohio State) pro-day believe that the run on receivers will begin with the Seattle Seahawks, who own the 18th selection and run through the 26th pick owned by the Los Angeles Rams.”

Pauline also noted that Egbuka’s pro-day showing cemented a first round placing, “likely in the middle part of the first frame.”

A lot of people like to criticise Tony. I’ve known him for a long time and consider him a friend. I think it’s important to note a couple of things. He’s an information gatherer from a variety of sources. He passes on rumours and sometimes speaks a little bit too matter-of-factly about what are essentially rumblings. If you’re willing to accept that’s what it is, you can have fun with it. Over the years some of those rumours have been true. He has been right on several stories, including some big ones. Just a year ago he said Byron Murphy was the guy the Seahawks wanted but they didn’t think he’d last.

He’s also had some whiffs. He famously passed on info from a source who thought the Seahawks were going to draft Trevor Penning and Desmond Ridder in 2022.

The point I’m making is this. Take all of this with a pinch of salt. Just don’t assume it’s all wrong. There may well be a feeling within the league — rightly or wrongly — that the Seahawks will take a receiver at #18. Plenty of people are mocking it.

Again, I’m not convinced they will. However, if you’d asked me a year ago whether I thought they’d take a cornerback at #16 I’d have also said ‘no’. Yet if Murphy hadn’t been available, we’ve since discovered the chances are Quinyon Mitchell or Terrion Arnold would’ve been Seattle’s choice.

If they did use their top pick on Golden or Egbuka, how would they fix the offensive line? I’m going to keep stressing this — there are plenty of options throughout this draft. It’s not Grey Zabel or bust. They might not see a big difference in grade between Zabel and others. Tate Ratledge, Donovan Jackson, Charles Grant or Marcus Mbow in round two, for example. Dylan Fairchild or Wyatt Milum in the middle rounds. The excellently violent Chase Lundt who is a personal favourite. Logan Brown or Jack Nelson. Or later round options such as Bryce Cabeldue and Connor Colby. All of these players graded well in zone.

I also wouldn’t completely rule out Tyler Booker, purely for the fact he’s plug-and-play, safe as houses, physically brilliant and carries A+ character marks. It might not be at #18. They might trade down first. But I don’t think he’s totally out of the equation, especially since the 49ers drafted Aaron Banks for the same scheme and Green Bay just paid him $19.25m a year to play for Matt LaFleur.

I think Zabel or Booker would be a very good top pick. If they decide to go in a different direction, they can still address their offensive line. The options are there and they have plenty of stock to work with.