Seahawks free agency live blog & open thread

Free agency officially begins at 1pm PST — but plenty of deals have already been confirmed. Kenny and I talked through some of those and what lies ahead in today’s podcast (see above).

I will update this post as news come in affecting the Seahawks.

What we know
— Jeremy Lane has agreed a four-year deal to stay in Seattle
— Bruce Irvin will be leaving the Seahawks to join the Raiders
— J.R. Sweezy is joining the Buccaneers
— Brandon Mebane has signed a three-year deal in San Diego
— Ahtyba Rubin has committed to staying in Seattle
— Chris Clemons will visit with the Seahawks

The key to Seattle’s off-season really is the future of Russell Okung. If he were to re-sign with the Seahawks — even on a short term contract — it gives them some flexibility in the draft. If he departs and they don’t add a replacement, they almost have to take an offensive tackle with the #26 pick.

As you can see, there isn’t a lot of scope to be active unless they fail to re-sign any of their existing players (something they stress is a priority). If they choose to draft a punter instead of re-signing Jon Ryan, they’ll have an extra $1.5m to play with.

On top of Okung’s future, Jeremy Lane’s situation is very intriguing. How much is he going to be offered on the open market? And how far are the Seahawks willing to stretch to keep him?

Who could they target?
Denver linebacker Brandon Marshall and Miami receiver Rishard Matthews have been linked to the Seahawks. Marshall has been tagged as a restricted free agent and would cost Seattle’s #56 pick. Matthews is an efficient wideout in the mould of Jermaine Kearse. Donald Penn referred to interest by Seattle in a NFL Network spot yesterday.

Live blog

— According to Albert Breer, Chris Clemons could be returning to Seattle…

— Here’s another name to throw into the mix — Cedric Thornton from the Eagles. He’s 6-4 and 309lbs and would be a nice addition to the D-line rotation. He was undrafted in 2011 and played end for the Eagles.

Rapoport is now suggesting the Seahawks are making a late push to keep Okung with a “strong offer”. He won’t be able to negotiate with other teams until free agency begins because he’s representing himself.

— In non-free agency news, Rapoport also says Jimmy Graham is on pace to return to action in week one for the Seahawks.

— Brandon Mebane will NOT be returning to the Seahawks. He’s signing a deal with the Chargers:

This is a blow for the Seahawks. They’ll likely need to replace Mebane in free agency. This could be why they’re showing interest in Cedric Thornton.

— J.R. Sweezy has opted to sign with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers:

Mike Garafolo says the Seahawks made an attempt keep Sweezy.

This isn’t a big shock considering the expensive guard market and the reported interest in Sweezy (Stroud says a dozen teams were interested). Mark Glowinski is a ready made replacement at right guard.

— According to Omar Kelly, the Seahawks are still interested in Rishard Matthews:

— Jeremy Lane is staying in Seattle…

Last week we considered the possibility that Lane would be a top priority. The Seahawks needed some consistency at cornerback after watching Brandon Browner and Byron Maxwell depart and Cary Williams flop.

Lane’s ability to play inside and out will be crucial. They have a stable of younger guys to provide depth behind Lane, Richard Sherman and DeShawn Shead. It’s a four-year deal so it’s a long-term commitment.

As noted above — the key now is Okung. If he stays — they have flexibility in the draft and can consider a number of different positions at #26. If he departs and they don’t sign a replacement — they pretty much have to go offensive tackle in round one.

587 Comments

  1. HawkPower12

    Not hearing anything bout Lane yet may be a good thing.

    I wonder if we will be surprised with another Seahawk trade right as the year begins…Jimmy last year, whom this year???

    LT, Martellus, or probably no one…can’t wait to see.

    • lil'stink

      Kyle Long. It ain’t gonna happen, but I really want it to. Can play guard or tackle, cheap in 2016 (last year of his deal, though). Instant upgrade to our OL for years to come.

      • Miles

        So I heard that the Maxwell trade is falling through due to his shoulder. I wonder if this could open the door for us to jump in and get him back??

  2. 503Hawk

    Not a huge Okung fan, but if he has a healthy year, he will a better LT than anyone Seattle can find at 26.
    That said, even if he resigns, eventually they will have to find a replacement to groom. So, I am hoping for both; resign Okung AND draft his replacement, whether that be in R1, R2, or w/ an R2 trade-back.

    We all knew Irvin was leaving, once we see the numbers we will have a better idea of next years (tradable) comp pick. Going to be a fun day.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    • RealRhino2

      Echo your thoughts on Okung. As Rob wrote in his blog, re-signing him gives us more flexibility early in the draft, but even if we have him back we should draft a developmental guy later (unless they think Poole is already that guy).

      No way should we be giving up #56 for a LB already getting paid starter money.

    • Rob Staton

      If Okung walks, Gilliam likely switches to LT and the #26 pick plays on the right.

    • matt

      @TomPelissero: Bruce Irvin’s deal with #Raiders is 4 years, $37 million, including $12.5M in the first year.

      Deal can be worth as much as $39 mil, with Pro Bowl incentives. That’s 4th round comp pick territory. Not bad a bad deal for both Seattle and Oakland.

  3. nichansen01

    I hope we are able to resign Jeremy Lane and Sign Donald Penn. Penn would be an upgrade from Okung.

    • Rob Staton

      That’s debatable. Oakland still has nearly $70m in cap room and Penn is from LA and is a self-confessed Raiders fan. If they’re not willing to keep him — based on the fact they can spend whatever it takes, that is telling.

      • Del tre

        Penn has already been linked to the Hawks and is usually healthy would be better than okung because okung is never on the field

        • Rob Staton

          Let’s not just assume though that Penn being healthy makes him a great fit. He’s had a very up-and-down career. And as mentioned — Oakland has $65m left in cap space. If they let Penn walk, why? He’s stated he wants to stay in Oakland. So why wouldn’t they keep him?

          • Del tre

            Because they might have a developmental guy they are looking at who could benefit from the reps Penn is old and not a long term solution for either team, plus like you said the Raiders have so much cap space and just sign osmele they might be looking for a left guard not a tackle anymore

            • Rob Staton

              On the last point — that’d be a knock on Penn if they signed a LG which is the point I was making really.

              I’m not aware of a developmental tackle on Oakland’s roster.

              Again — if they don’t re-sign Penn I’d be asking, why? They have the money and he has the want to.

              • franks

                They’re 70M under but that doesn’t mean they’ll pay a placeholder like Penn more than they thinks he’s worth. The office and the player may have different valuations of the player.

                • ZacScratchFever

                  Simply put, they need a LT. They should easily be able to resign Penn without overpaying. There doesn’t seem to be a direct line to a better alternative. If they see a better alternative, it doesn’t speak well of their evaluation of a guy they know very well. It is the Raiders.

                  • franks

                    The Raiders are a good young team with a firmer grasp of who’s who than we have. Maybe they see Osemele a a guard, maybe they see a lot of things, maybe they’re right and maybe they’re wrong. We need to stop reading too much into every move every team makes IMO. We don’t know their reasons and we don’t know if they’re right.

              • Del tre

                Oh no I think osmele is going to be there LT sorry I was so unclear

        • rowdy

          Half the free agents have been linked to the hawks though

          • Steele

            I do not think Penn will remain with the Raiders. Based on what I’m seeing. Norton is very excited about getting Irvin. He is going to have a monster season.

  4. Dingbatman

    Rob. Love to hear your thoughts on the possibility of any current back ups stepping up into starting roles next year. You’ve already said you weren’t optimistic on any of our O/L (which is pretty disappointing considering how many linemen they drafted last year). Tye Smith? Pinkins? Seisay? Simon? Glowinski? Farmer? Sokoli? Francis? If the Hawks feel good about even a couple of those guys becoming legit starters it could have implications on the direction they go in the draft.

    • Rob Staton

      It’s hard to project DBM because we’ve seen so little of those players. Farmer for example played receiver in college. Sokoli played DT and Pinkins was a safety. Simon has always shown potential but can’t stay healthy.

    • Attyla the Hawk

      Of that list, he’s how I would speculate (assumes they make the team):

      Likely contributors:

      1. Glowinski
      2. Simon
      3. Francis

      Possible contributor:

      1. Smith
      2. Seisay
      3. Sokoli

      About as likely as Korey Toomer:

      1. Farmer
      2. Pinkins

      I think Sokoli could be in the unlikely category. But with the way OL depth is churned due to injuries — I think he’d be pressed into service by way of sheer numbers/need.

      • Jarhead

        I don’t know, other than Simon who was IR’d, Sokoli and Glowinski were the only 2 kept on the active roster all 16 games last season. Seems pretty telling to me. They gave Michael 3 seasons to get it straight before cutting bait. So I think your list is a little presumptive. I think a lot of those guys were acquired last year in preparation of this year. So 5 rookies are going to come in NFL ready and contribute every week and add depth?

    • Del tre

      Frak Clark might replace Irvin he is down to 257 and has more pass rush moves than Irvin ever did he also played backer at Michigan. I’m not saying he is better but Irvin had his speed and that was about it

      • franks

        257 in shoes and pants. Could definitely be moving outside.

        • Del tre

          I know still I’m really excited about him getting on the field more he has 10 to 15 sack potential and I hope he lives up to it

          • franks

            Defense would be dear near unstoppable if we added a guy like that to Avril and Bennett.

            • Del tre

              Great part is if they add Clemons they get a guy who led the jags last year with 38 qb hurries hello leo

  5. DD

    Hasselbeck retired !

    • Attyla the Hawk

      Not only retired. But replacing Ditka on NFL Countdown.

      • Coug1990

        That alone is good news. Ditka was past his prime when he was coach of the Saints.

        • smitty1547

          Hasselbeck will be good in that role

          • Miles

            I wish he would sign with us and make his last day in the NFL a Seahawks day. Also put him in the Ring of Honor. I will definitely be tuning into Sunday NFL Countdown more now for sure.

            • Joe

              Hass confirmed that he wants to sign such a contract and retire as a Hawk!

  6. Attyla the Hawk

    Given this is a lean pass rush draft, I’d wonder if we don’t target that in UFA.

    Seems strong at OT (if picking at #26), and particularly strong at OG/OC. Good DTs deep in the draft but not deep at pass rushing.

    Wonder if we don’t blow up something and bring in a big ticket pass rusher. Seems like the smart ‘blended’ strategy to take what’s available via draft and address what’s lean by way of FA.

    • Rob Staton

      “Wonder if we don’t blow up something and bring in a big ticket pass rusher.”

      A lot of the big names are signed up already and the going rate seems to be $8.5m APY. Will be very difficult.

      • RWIII

        If the Hawks can resign Clemons that would be AWESOME! !!

        • Ben2

          I love me some Clem but he’s old and got cut by the Jags….do we want a savvy vet or a young developmental pass rusher? Only so many roster spaces…

    • dave crockett

      I don’t think teams are too much letting sacks walk out the door in UFA. That makes me think that targeting pass rush is gonna be done with bodies, in the draft and UFA. It won’t be high profile guys most likely, except maybe a guy like Nick Perry if his market is soft. Otherwise they’ll look for guys with a skill set or athletic profile rather than production.

    • franks

      It appears we’re too late for that.

      Clemmons is intriguing to the homer in me but I haven’t watched him play since he went to Jax.

      • franks

        But then there’s Olivier Vernon.

        • RWIII

          If the Hawks signed Vernon that would use up almost all of their Cap room. They would have very little cap space available.

          • franks

            Giants just paid him double what the Dolphins had him for. Way too much, I didn’t know he was in that range.

  7. matt

    Ian RapoportVerified account
    ‏@RapSheet
    The #Seahawks are working to bring back Brandon Mebane before 4 pm today. They already secured Ahtyba Rubin on that DL, working on Mebane

    It would be huge for us to keep our run stuffing duo, in the first day of FA no less.

  8. Trevor

    I think they are trying to figure out how to get Mebane, Okung and Lane done with $14 mil in cap space. Would mean no outside FAs except maybe in vet min range.

    • mishima

      Which makes the Marsall rumor interesting/confusing. I think they’ll get something done with Bane, try to keep Lane and prepare to lose Okung.

      Losing Lane and Okung would give them about 11 million to sign a few 2nd tier FAs. Thinking veteran OL.

      • rowdy

        Countless names hav ed been linked to teams. Sources come from everywhere this time of year trying to there client look hotter then he is

      • Miles

        It’s very possible Seahawks are getting rumors out there to prevent value for their players going way up. What better way to prevent a bidding war than to pretend your funds are going elsewhere?

    • lil'stink

      I think the odds of getting all 3 are unfortunately probably not very good. We also probably want to keep a little extra $ to make a Kevin Williams or Fred Jackson type signing later in the year, not sure if Hsu’s numbers reflect that?

      Hope we bring Mebane back, I would love it if Seattle is the only team he ever plays for, but it seems like this would be the year to replace him with the talent spread in the draft. But, like Okung, re-signing Mebane would give us more flexibility in the draft.

  9. HawkfaninMT

    A couple names of interest to me going into today, other than our guys) are Courtney Upshaw and Nick Perry. I would love to Upshaw brought in to take Irvin’s LB spot, or KJs and he slides over, whichever is a better fit. Perry would be a nice rotational piece aka Irvin, or Schoefield when he was here.

    Then there is also Brandon Brooks. Pipe dream probably, but he would go a long way towards solidifying the interior of the line.

    I saw the Maxwell trade broke down. Was he going to rework his contract and the Eagles take the big cap hit like they did with Murray? If the contract were restructured I would love it if they could bring Maxwell back

    • Rob Staton

      Upshaw — nowhere near fast enough to play Irvin’s spot for Seattle. Perry IMO is a very, very average player. Nothing special about him physically. He’d have to be dirt cheap I think.

      Brooks is garnering +$8m APY on the market.

      Maxwell to Miami back on now apparently.

      • hawkfaninMT

        Yup, looks like the Miami trade is official… What a robbery by the Eagles

        • Scraps

          What a robbery by the Eagles

          Or a robbery by the Dolphins. One mediocre year; I’m not ready to write Maxwell off, especially because last year in Philly was a bad year for everybody. Of course, even the Eagles were better organized than the Dolphins….

      • HI Hawk

        Agree on Upshaw, didn’t like him on draft day and all he’s done in the NFL is prove he is who we thought he was: An unathletic run support specialist.

        Perry doesn’t strike me as any better than Marsh, so I don’t see him as interesting for the Seahawks.

        If Maxwell takes a pay-cut to go to Miami, it could help keep Lane’s market in check. I would like to see him back, but I don’t think he’s worth more than $4 million.

      • J

        IIRC perry had a really good combine.

        Not saying he is a good player but saying he is not a special athelete isnt correct.

        4 64 forty, 38.5 inch vert, 35 reps on the bench. 10’4 broad. At 271 pounds.

        • Rob Staton

          I didn’t say anything about his athleticism.

          I said physically he isn’t special. And based on what we’ve seen at GB, I’d stand by that.

          • J

            What do you mean by “physically special” if you aren’t referring to physical ability?

            If you are using it to mean his effort level, technique, or abilty to use his atheticism it is a misuse of the term. If you use it to mean his physical ability you are wrong. He can run fast, jump high and lift a lot of weight.

            • Steele

              Perry had a hard time staying healthy. That’s the main thing. I know you don’t think he would be worth pursuing (Rob). I am on the fence. Perry has had some really good games. If anyone knows, it’s Pete, who coached him at USC.

  10. matt

    http://cover32.com/2016/03/09/frank-clark-slimming-seahawks/

    The ‘plan’ looks like Clark moving into Irvins spot. SAM in the base defense. Edge rusher on passing downs. That news moves the need for a starting LB way down the draft board.

    • Rob Staton

      I wouldn’t jump straight to that conclusion.

      They might want Clark to be more of a speed/edge compliment. Just because he’s down to 257lbs doesn’t mean he’s automatically going to replace Irvin.

      • matt

        You’re right making that conclusion is a bit presumptuous. Marsh cut some weight after his rookie year and got some time at SAM in the offseason. Looks like they’re doing the same thing with Clark. He may or may not be stick at SAM, but the signs point strongly at him getting a look there. Marsh and Clark being asked to cut weight could just be JS/PC wanting them to be quicker and more versatile.

        • Rob Staton

          I think they’re looking for more speed up front — Marsh and Clark losing weight could be indicative of that. Plus a faster WILL. Could be Pinkins, Morgan or KPL — or a replacement in FA/draft.

          • Miles

            Rob, I remember you were not too high on Bruce Irvin gaining muscle last year. How do you feel about Clark dropping weight? Do you feel it will change him as a player in a negative or positive way?

            • Rob Staton

              If it makes him quicker — good stuff for his edge rush.

              • Miles

                Quick is good. Power is also good. Hopefully both aspects of his game flourish.

      • HI Hawk

        It also means we could see a rotation of SAMs, much like 2013 where Malcolm Smith played as many, if not more, snaps as Irvin at linebacker.

        I do think there are on-roster options to replace Irvin’s production, but when depth players become starters, the depth needs replenished.

        If KPL and Clark end up splitting time at SAM, that will necessitate improved depth at inside passrusher and outside linebacker (both SAM and WILL) because after the oft-injured KPL, the only guy left is Pinkins (a safety convert) and maybe Mike Morgan. They’re going to need to use an early pick somewhere along the front-7. A talent influx is sorely needed with Irvin’s departure whether that player starts or not.

        • Rob Staton

          “It also means we could see a rotation of SAMs, much like 2013 where Malcolm Smith played as many, if not more, snaps as Irvin at linebacker.”

          Agreed.

        • Hawksince77

          Deion Jones in the second, after William Jackson in the first.

          That’s my thinking, assuming they get the o-line figured out prior to the draft.

          • Del tre

            I like William Jackson’s play bUT there is one thing I whole heartedly agree with rob about its that Seattle has specific criteria for corners including 32 inch arms William Jackson doesn’t have that

      • JT

        I highly doubt that they play Clark at SAM LB much, if at all. The weight loss pretty much guarantees that Clark will replace Irvin as an edge rusher in nickel however, rather than playing inside like last season. They play nickel half their snaps anyway so he will be on the field rushing the passer a lot.

      • smitty1547

        sure looks like the plan to me

        • Rob Staton

          There are many reasons why a guy would lose weight.

          Irvin played safety before becoming an edge rusher. His game was predicated on speed and he was a natural fit to try and linebacker.

          Clark is not a speed guy like Irvin. He’s a raw, athletic bigger guy. If they’re getting him to slim down the chances are he’s doing it to be more effective working the edge than converting to a position where freedom of movement is crucial. Clark’s a pass rusher.

          • Del tre

            Frank Clark can also stop the run though and the Hawks have played while not relying on SAM in coverage as much

            • Steele

              Regardless, I think they need more than Clark to bolster the pass rush.

              • Del tre

                Ogbah? I think they need interior pressure teams can have 2 great tackles but only one team has a good line through and through and that’s the cowboys. It’s tough to say I’d like to see Adolphus Washington and Willie Henry or Javon Hargrave and Henry. With a dt that can deliver regular pressure the defense will be beast

                • Ben2

                  Washington didn’t have a good combine but has good tape- I’ll take the tape and maybe if we’re lucky the combine performance pushes him into rd 3 for us

    • Cysco

      very interesting. thanks for posting.

      • matt

        No problem. It’s worth noting that it’s only been 7-8 weeks since the end of the Hawks season and Clark is sporting some smooth J’s and pants-another few pounds no doubt.

    • GeoffU

      I highly doubt Clark would play the SAM position. Most likely they’re training him up for the LEO or other DE spot. Him and Avril on the ends with Bennett up the middle, should be similar to the glory year of Clem, Avril, and Bennett wreaking havoc all the way to the Super Bowl.

      I don’t get all the worry about replacing Irvin’s SAM role, I really don’t think it’s that important of a position. We really just need someone who’s cheap, fast, and assignment correct.

      • C-Dog

        Least important position of the of the LBs when you factor in the nickel. Here’s the things that makes me think perhaps he could be a candidate for SAM; They are looking at kicking the tires on Chris Clemons again, Clark curiously decided to post the information about his weight drop and the “plan being in effect” on twitter the night Irving agreed with Oakland, I believe he started is college career as an outside linebacker for Michigan, so there is some background there with him.

        I think it’s just as likely he is dropping the weight more specifically to be the nickel LEO. However, this is falls into the Nothing Surprises Me Anymore category for me with the Seahawks, and maybe they are going to ask him to make the transition.

        • GeoffU

          I wouldn’t put it past them either. The more I think about it, I guess if you want Clark on the field more and your starting 1st down line is Bennett, Rubin, Bane, and Avril it’d be a good way to do it.

      • reggieregg

        Darron Lee…?

    • Lenny

      With the strength of the defensive ends in this draft being at the 5 technique rather than the Leo I think it makes more sense to use Clark as rotational Leo. Clark backing up Avril and drafting a backup for Bennett seems like a better plan than trying to find a Leo in the draft. It takes a really special kind of athlete to play Sam and Leo like Irvin did. The Hawks are probably going to have to replace him with 2 players.

      • Volume12

        Seattle doesn’t use a LEO anymore. When Clemons left they scraped it.

        A LEO is a wide 9 DE alignment off the LT.

  11. Steve Nelsen

    Given the Seahawks’ long-standing pursuit of a #1-ype WR, do you think that they kick the tires on Mike Wallace?

    • matt

      Nope. Wallace is a guy who sulks when he doesn’t get the ball. Not a team guy. Wouldn’t want him on the roster, even for the minimum. imo

      • Elijah

        If reports are to be believed, that’s really just not true at all..

        “(Wallace) probably was disappointing from a statistical standpoint, but (there was) what Mike Wallace brought into our locker room and his buy-in and his sacrifice from a standpoint of stats and what was best for the team,’’ general manager Rick Spielman said last month at the NFL Scouting Combine.

        “And I know Coach (Mike) Zimmer mentioned it in his postseason press conference, but he was a true professional and everything he was asked to do, he did it to his best. And his leadership also was very key to the success that we had on the field.”

        http://www.twincities.com/2016/03/04/vikings-like-mike-wallace-and-phil-loadholt-at-right-price/

    • lil'stink

      IMHO I think Baldwin would be a better #1 receiver for us than Wallace at this point. I would take Lockett over Wallace as well. Poor Doug can’t get no respect 🙂

    • Drew

      He’s not a #1 type. To me he’s Percy Harvin lite (skills and attitude)

      • Miles

        The only FA WRs that make sense to me at all are Jermaine Kearse, Rishard Matthews and Anquan Boldin.

  12. Drew

    Olivier Vernon is now a free agent. Miami revoked the transition tag

    • CHawk Talker Eric

      It was the only thing they could do.

      • Veryal

        Signed with the Giants

  13. CHawk Talker Eric

    Alex Boone to MIN.

  14. austin

    Rob thoughts on if we get Marshall and have to give up our 56? I hate the idea but don’t know a whole lot about Marshall either. Curious to hear what you think. Thanks!

    • Rob Staton

      He’s a good guy, team player. Plays very solid defense but not a major playmaker. Won’t be disappointed if it doesn’t happen, won’t be disappointed if it does.

    • Drew

      If it was just a 2nd, it wouldn’t be a terrible deal, but also having to take on his salary as well, no thanks.

  15. Ty the Guy

    Not expecting any huge news this free agency period from the Hawks. The cap “noose” is shrinking every year for them if they want to keep core, important pieces.

    I really admire Schneider’s ability to evaluate a player’s value to the team. Browner, Tate, Maxwell, Carpenter, Giocamini, Irvin…. these are all good players that were not irreplaceable. It will always be difficult from now on to find the right “supporting” cast. But they seem to be doing a great job of it.

    That being said Lane, Okung, Sweezy, and Mebane would take the pressure off the draft. And allow PCJS to dictate their board. (like they are not going to anyways) I am just saying that instead of the idea of HAVING to draft a LT in round one. We would have flexibility if we could resign those guys. Lane and Okung especially.

    • Ty the Guy

      Chris Polk anyone?

      • franks

        I think he’d fit. Won’t break the bank but then again he will make veteran money.

    • Scraps

      I think giving up Maxwell was a mistake, even with the cost. (I know he had a mediocre year, but I feel that was mostly the Eagles.)

      Lots of people disagree, I know. So maybe I’ll put it differently: giving up Maxwell was a mistake, because we didn’t have a reasonable substitute at all. Number one mistake was the offensive line; number two was never filling the opposite cornerback from Sherman.

  16. CHawk Talker Eric

    Bruce Irvin deal:

    4 years
    $37M
    $19M guaranteed

    Salaries:
    Yr 1 – $6.25M
    Yr 2 – $4.5M
    Yr 3 – $8M (guaranteed for injury at signing)
    Yr 4 – $9M

    Roster bonuses
    $6M in 2016
    $2.25M in 2017

    • Trevor

      Sounds like a 2017 4th round Comp pick at best in this market

      • CHawk Talker Eric

        Yep, not quite a R3 comp.

        • Ukhawk

          How certain is it a 4th? Not a 3rd?

        • Ukhawk

          Hmm How certain is it a 4th? Not a 3rd?

          • CHawk Talker Eric

            There are only so many R3 comps awarded in any year, and those go to the teams whose players signed elsewhere for the most money. In this year, the threshold is likely to be over $10M APY. Irvin’s APY is $9.25M.

          • GeoffU

            It’s impossible to say right now, too much is in flux. However, looks like a lot of players will be getting more than Irvin and since only four 3rd round picks will be handed out this year, it will probably be a 4th at best. And if we sign Okung, will we even get one at all?

            • TannerM

              Okung wouldn’t make a difference, since he’s our own free agent. If they went out and signed say Olivier Vernon, who is a free agent due to his contract running out and not due to his previous team dropping him, then that would cancel the presumed comp pick.

            • Steve Nelsen

              We don’t lose one if we keep Okung.

            • J

              I don’t think you lose those picks for resigning your own guys.

              • GeoffU

                Ah, got it, thanks to all three of you!

      • ClevelandHawk

        Overthecap has an interesting tool to track this:

        http://overthecap.com/compensatory-draft-picks-cancellation-chart/

        One point the chart highlights is the cancellation effect of signing players, with little regard for salary. For instance, Baltimore signing Watson cancels out Osemele. So, as the point is made above, it is truly too soon to reckon the value of the picks. Bruce seems solidly in the fourth round with a possibility of bumping to third round, depending on who signs.

  17. CHawk Talker Eric

    Chris Clemons to visit SEA

    • Rob Staton

      There we go…

      • Trevor

        Do you think he has anything left in the tank as a situational pass rusher 15/20 snaps a game?

        • Rob Staton

          Possibly. As an impact guy with no responsibility to be ‘the guy’ he might have a year left.

          • Naks8

            If he signs for min then it sounds like a win win situation

            • Miles

              He may have lost speed but he doesn’t necessarily need to be elite in that area to do what he did in our system. In 2013, his main responsibilities were to set edges and maintain gap control, and yes, rush the passer in the NASCAR package. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

              • 503Hawk

                Clem was amazing at setting the edge and diagnosing plays.

  18. POB

    Chris Clemons headed to Seattle. 34 & wasn’t super productive last year, but he’s done well in Pete’s system previously.

    • bobbyk

      Party like it’s 2013!

  19. Trevor

    Chris Clemons on his way to PNW to meet the Hawks. Loved Clemons but not sure how much he would have left in the tank. Would prefer Chris Long if we go the veteran pass rusher route but maybe he is too pricey.

  20. Trevor

    Did Breno get cut by Jets? Would love him and Clem back as leadership and role players.

    • Rob Staton

      He was not cut.

      • Trevor

        That is too bad. I thought he would be the ideal LG to line up next to Gilliam and provide some nastiness / leadership to the OL.

        • franks

          Alex Marvez ‏@alexmarvez 3h3 hours ago

          Source tells @NFLonFOX that @nyjets are sniffing around the free-agent tackle market. Wither Breno Giacomini???

  21. CHawk Talker Eric

    Does anyone else think Leonard Floyd and Travis Feeney are pretty similar?

    Floyd – 6’5″ 240lbs, 4.60/2.68/1.59, 39.5″ VJ, 10’07” BJ
    Fenney – 6’4″ 230lbs, 4.50/2.64/1.58, 40″ VJ, 10’10” BJ

    • Sea Mode

      Someone threw in Pinkins’ Pro Day numbers in yesterday’s thread. Less productive at the position, a bit smaller, but similar measurables.

      E. Pinkins — 6’3″ 220lbs 40yd: 4.44 10yd: 1.59. Vert: 39.5

      • Drew

        Pinkins also played at a smaller school (SD State) and at a different position (safety), but did play in the box and covered the slot a lot. Level of competition was a lot different.

    • Steele

      Yes. The difference being, Feeney has a bad shoulder, needs more work and would come cheaper.

  22. Ukhawk

    Ian Williams signs 5 years at 5-6apy. Rubin deals looks better

  23. nichansen01

    Frank Clark will replace Irvin, he’s slimming down. Mebane and Lane likely resigned. Sign Clemmons to fill Clarks role in the defense. Draft three offensive linemen and 1 defensive tackle in the first three rounds.

    • Rob Staton

      “Frank Clark will replace Irvin, he’s slimming down.”

      We don’t know that.

      “Mebane and Lane likely resigned”

      We don’t know that either.

  24. lil'stink

    I thought Clemons had the reputation of being a complete jerk, not a good presence in the locker room. With his declining play in recent years is he even worth a vet minimum deal?

    • Rob Staton

      Clearly not how the team see it if they’re entertaining bringing him back.

    • GeoffU

      I never heard anything like that at all about Clem. Quite the opposite, in fact.

      • lil'stink

        Perhaps. I just have heard it mentioned several times on both 950 KJR and 710 ESPN.

        • D

          I think he was bad with the media, not bad with the other players. Danny O’neil was just tweeting something along those lines.

          • lil'stink

            Perhaps that’s what it was. Seems like many reporters nowadays take it personally and allow it to skew their reporting.

            • Scraps

              Yep. When the media paints some guy as a jerk, I wait and see whether any non-media picks it up. The fans should be cautious when following the media. Especially Seahawks fans should know (e.g., Lynch).

        • C-Dog

          I think he was a team leader in a crusty old man kind of way. Wouldn’t be bad to bring that attitude back home, IMO.

    • Drew

      He was a good leader, quiet, didn’t take any non-sense. There was a time Sherm said Clem told him to shut the F* up in the huddle. Teammates listen to him.

      He’s like the grouchy old dog that all of the young pups do what he says and stays out of his way.

      • GeoffU

        I remember a Real Rob Report that had something like that too. Players were joking and using the N word and I think he told them to shut it and grow up or something to that effect. Pretty sure after that they started the “Brother my brother” thing in place of the N word.

        • Miles

          He is a strong personality. I also think, from what I heard, he is a jerk. He once whipped a towel in the face of a young reporter according to Danny O’Neill. But inside the locker room, it seems like he uses that personality to the benefit of the team. In a locker room full of alphas, I think some guys need to/can be like that and it works.

  25. CHawk Talker Eric

    @AdamSchefter: Falcons closing in on a deal for Browns C Alex Mack, but not done deal yet, per source.

    • Drew

      that’d be great for the Falcons to solidify their OL to protect Ryan. Saw earlier they were interested in Sweezy, so don’t know how that’d help protect Ryan, but would be good for their run game.

      • TannerM

        I’d actually argue that the Falcons have a better future with their run game than their passing attack, since the only guy who can seemingly catch the ball on a regular basis now is Julio Jones and they have two young running backs who seem to have good futures. Plus, their coach came from a run-first team in Seattle…

  26. CHawk Talker Eric

    So far, Doug Pederson and Howie Roseman have won FA for PHI.

  27. CHawk Talker Eric

    @MikeSilver: I am hearing that RT Mitchell Schwartz likely won’t return to the Browns…

    • Drew

      mass exodus. nobody wants to be in Cleveland

      • Rob Staton

        Looks like a front office that doesn’t know what it’s doing in Cleveland in terms of contracts.

  28. vrtkolman

    $12 million a year for Janoris Jenkins? What in the world?

    • Drew

      Look at what Maxwell got last year. Who do you think is better?

      Obviously Jenkins isn’t top talent but he’s the best thats available and combine that with a huge cap increase and that’s what happens.

      • vrtkolman

        That’s a good point haha. Yeah I would say Jenkins is better than Maxwell, and he could be a legit #1 corner. He’s such a bonehead though.

  29. rowdy

    Depending on 2 hat happens with okung I’m thinking shaq lawson might be who they go after at 26

    • Drew

      I don’t know if he’s athletic enough. He’s good and I loved watching him all last year, but to me he looks like Frank Clark 2.0, but not quite as athletic.

      Essentially it would almost be 3 Michael Bennetts on the roster.

      • Del tre

        Michael be nett had similar numbers to Lawson

        • rowdy

          This and clack cut weight and isn’t like bennett anymore he’s more like bruce

          • Del tre

            I mean that would be one hell of a pass rush just send Clark on a blitz with Bennett and Lawson lined up next to each other in nickel sack city

    • Rob Staton

      Might be a bit too similar to Bennett and Clark (although Clark is a much better athlete).

      • rowdy

        If Clark’s down to 157 he isn’t and no one was knocking clack for being to similar to bennett

        • MJ

          I know you meant 257…but it gave me a good chuckle to read “157.”

          • 503Hawk

            “69 YEARS?!” No, 6 to 9 years!

            • smitty1547

              3 Bennetts could never be a bad thing

    • RealRhino2

      I think he’d be a good pick, showing very similar athleticism to Frank Clark but perhaps being a more polished pass rusher.

      But I don’t think he’ll be around at #26.

  30. C-Dog

    Cedric Thorton is a solid young run stuffer. Nice to see Seattle looking at him.

    • vrtkolman

      If they swoop in and get him, I wonder if they pull Mebane’s offer. He’s better than Mebane right now.

      • Miles

        Davis Hsu, although not an infallible source of football information, says Cedric is more of a 3T, 5T. So his signing would not replace a Mebane signing. I think the Hawks will get Mebane back, probably today.

        • JT

          Cedric would play 3T, and Rubin would slide over the 1T since he has the size/stoutness to do so. If they sign Thornton, Mebane is as good as gone.

          • C-Dog

            Yeah, I think Thornton would be the 3 tech, and Rubin would be the nose. Not a bad paring at all in the base. I think Rubin is a natural nose.

  31. Trevor

    Rob the league is in serious talks about completely eliminating any type of cut block. As we all know this is a big part of the ZBS scheme Cable teaches. I think this could have a huge impact on our run blocking. My question is where you think this would impact the type of player they look to draft on the OL?

    • vrtkolman

      A little sarcasm here, but could it actually improve the run blocking? I can’t count how many plays were blown up the last several years because our linemen completely whiffed on their cut blocks.

    • Rob Staton

      I think they’d have to adjust their technique and plan on certain calls — but I’m not sure it’d have much impact in the players they look at. Few specialise at cut blocking in college.

      • LandofBoz

        I believe they are only looking at banning the Chop Block, not the Cut Block.

        • GeoffU

          Yes, it’s the chop block not the cut block. If they banned cut blocks little players would never be able to block larger players haha.

        • Steele

          It is actually a long time coming. The chop block has always struck me as dirty. It was a specialty of the 49ers in the 1980s. The dirty in front of Montana helped him a lot.

          • manthony

            Haven’t chop blocks been a penalty for a while?
            Where a blocker is engaged with a defender up high and another blocker blocks him low?

  32. CHawk Talker Eric

    @RapSheet: #Seahawks are making moves before the bell rings. I’m told they made a strong offer to pending FA tackle Russell Okung. Trying to keep him

    • franks

      God.

    • bobbyk

      Well, it would be nice going into the draft not being forced to take a tackle at #26. Could open up a host of options with that pick if we weren’t forced to take that position. I’d rather go BPA.

      • franks

        That’s true. And Okung the player is preferable to a rookie if you’re just looking at this year. But is Bailey good enough for you at LT in the playoffs gaist teams like the Packers and the Panthers and the Broncos? He needs to approach this offseason like it’s his last.

  33. Trevor

    This from Rapoport

    #Seahawks are making moves before the bell rings. I’m told they made a strong offer to pending FA tackle Russell Okung. Trying to keep him

    • Miles

      Okung is representing himself and sees excited to see what other teams think he is worth. I think he will consider the Seahawks offer but he’s not going to let it stop him from hitting the market. Unless it’s going to make him the highest-paid tackle.

      • j hawk

        I believe we were 10-2 with Okung out of the lineup. In the famous words of Elsa “let him go…let him go”.

        • Miles

          Come on bro did you really just reference Frozen dude? Wow. I’m impressed.

          But seriously I think Okung is the best lineman on our roster. It would hurt to lose him because no one will be better than him at that spot next year. Also, we need cohesion.

          • neil

            He can’t sta on the field for more than 4-5 games at a stetch.

            • Miles

              That’s why you try to sign him short-term and draft his replacement. Particularly someone who can play LG year one. So Ifedi.

          • Del tre

            Idk man I think Gilliam was better buy the end of the season and has a high ceiling

  34. nichansen01

    If the seahawks really want Okung and mebane back it looks like Lane is a gonner, and a corner will be drafted at some point.

    • Trevor

      Have the Hawks have never drafted a CB higher than Rd#4 or signed a CB to a 2nd contract except Sherm. That speaks volumes about how they feel about their ability to develop CBs. I was hoping they would re-sign Lane but unless is on a short term low cost deal it looks unlikely.

      • Miles

        I predict if the Hawks get Okung they will have around $5m left to spend of FAs. I think that is enough room to fit Lane in if both sides are willing to be creative.

        • Miles

          If they get Okung and Mebane, I mean.

          • franks

            That sounds accurate but there won’t be much room going forward. THornton or Mebane and a corner on Day 1 or 2 might do more for us without squeezing up to the cap.

            • franks

              day 1 or 2 of the draft

              • Miles

                Were we expecting anything else? We only have enough room to re-sign maybe three guys and/or one medium-priced outside FA.

                • franks

                  Lane would be something else.

                  • franks

                    Because if we got him and Okung, we’d be tight against the cap.

      • franks

        Never say never, Trevor.

        Mock w/ Okung & Mebane on board, Lane on the plane:

        1. William Jackson
        2. Tapper
        3.a. Landon Turner
        3.b. Adolphus Washington
        4. Harlan Miller. Ball hawking NB puts us back in the black for T.O. differential.
        5. Pearce Slater. To backup Gilliam.

        • franks

          Bailey is a must-sign if Okung comes back.

          • Volume12

            Why?

            • franks

              Injury risk

              • Volume12

                OK. Why Bailey though?

                • franks

                  Ok Vol, Bailey or someone else who isnt a rookie and can pass block.

                  • Volume12

                    Don’t take it personaly buddy.

                    Just curious at to why Alvin Bailey is a ‘must’ sign.

                  • franks

                    Because he’s shown a basic competency at LT, he’s still growing and he’s already here.

                  • franks

                    Also his versatility ,with Sokoli taking a spot and still likely a yeaar from contributing.

                  • franks

                    or we could find someone else who has those things for cheap, but it wont be easy.

                  • Volume12

                    Was just looking for an answer, and there it is, thank you.

                  • franks

                    I think you got me wrong buddy, I wasn’t taking offense I was saying maybe you’re right, someone else could do it too.

              • mishima

                I think they’ll upgrade LG and use Britt as backup G, RT.

  35. Miles

    Now this …

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 2m2 minutes ago
    Marvin Jones’ deal with the #Lions is for 5 years at $40M, source said. $20M in guarantees, $17M fully guaranteed. Thru 3 years, it’s $27M

    Dianna Marie Russini ‏@diannaESPN 7m7 minutes ago
    It appears that the Falcons are the favorite to land Mohammed Sanu as their offer is over 7 million per year #Atlanta

    Nice knowing you Jermaine Kearse.

    • franks

      Kearse is getting paid if Sanu gets 7.

      • Miles

        Hey, at least we’ll be getting a fourth for him next year along with Irvin’s 3rd/4th.

        • franks

          The silver lining for me.

    • RealRhino2

      Or maybe the teams dumb enough to pay good money for average WRs will fill their spots and the market will dry up for Kearse. Those deals seem bad to me.

      People say this is a weak receiver draft, but to me it seems pretty strong as long as you are looking for receivers on Kearse’s level, guys that aren’t going to be #1 but will be good #3 guys who might turn into #2s. Why spend $7MM for that in FA?

      • RealRhino2

        Replying to my own post 😉 Clayton just reaffirmed he still thinks (after Jones and Sanu deals) that Kearse ends up around $4.5MM, maybe 5.

  36. MJ

    Lock up Okung. Draft Ryan Kelly at #26.

    I’m fully on board with Kelly or Ifedi at 26. Let’s beef up that interior.

  37. CHawk Talker Eric

    @RapSheet: Last year, #Seahawks traded for Jimmy Graham at the deadline. This year? I’m told his rehab is going well, expected to be ready for Week 1

    Good news!

    • Volume12

      Let’s trade him! j/k.

      Seattle is so much better off without a dynamic 6’7 target that was just starting to assimilate.

      • franks

        HA but really that’s great news I wonder how it’s going with Rawls

        • 75franks

          rawls should be ready for training camp

          • franks

            Hope so cousin but will he be 100%

            • 75franks

              “Thomas is going to get a great shot at it,” Carroll said when asked about the starting running back job. “He did everything he could his rookie season to make a statement that he belongs. We love the style, he’s a great kid. I can’t imagine that he’s not going to be right in the middle of it. I don’t know who else is going to be added to the team, but he’s coming in as the guy that we’re looking to him to give the ball to and he’s recovering really well. I just saw him two days ago, he’s in really good shape right now, he’s getting ready for it. It’s going to be a haul for him but he’ll make it for camp and be ready to go and we’ll expect a lot out of him.”

              this was PC at the combine

              • franks

                Reading between the lines of Pete’s neverending positivity, “It’s going to be a haul for him.”

                Th commenter J said something a couple days ago, that hasn’t been being said. This might be a more serious injury than we think.

                • j

                  He is dealing with torn ligaments. Plural. I am no doctor, but ligament damage has ended careers. See Victor Cruz. The difference being knee versus ankle.

                  This particularly concerns me in that our depth chart behind Rawls consists of street free agents. One may think highly of Christine MIchael, but that is the type of player he is. He did nothing in the three years he was here. When he got cut he couldn’t make another teams active roster. He had a couple good games down the stretch, but that has to be compared to the years of nothing he showed prior.

                  If Rawls does not recover, we are looking at Michael, Bryce Brown and Dejuan Harris again.

                  Additionally, the run game is so integral to our offensive philosophy, being stuck with replacement level production at the position will have a huge impact. Would Carroll be willing to transition to a pass-first offense to make up for the lack of talent at RB? I would not think so.

                  • j

                    Self correction, Michael was not cut. He got traded to the Cowboys. Where he didn’t make the roster until week seven. And promptly fell flat on his face running behind one of the best o-lines out there.

                  • franks

                    I wouldn’t think so either.

                    I like Michael for a backup but you’re right that he hasn’t shown it yet.

                    Really warming up to Kenneth Dixon in the low second round. Tough and powerfull gets tons of YAC and TDs, undersized like Rawls, viable as the third down back right away.

                  • Thorson

                    FWIW, as a doctor, I’m less worried about Rawls’ injury than Graham’s. There are three ligaments on the outside of the ankle. In a garden variety ankle sprain with swelling and bruising, usually at least two of the three ligaments are partially torn. Most people recover more or less fully from an ankle sprain within six months. In Rawls’ case, my understanding from what has been written is that he had a fracture but no surgery. If that’s the case, that might be even better than a sprain, because that would imply his fracture wasn’t displaced and since bones heal with bone (versus soft tissue injuries like a sprain healing with scar), he could be good as new. The news about Graham is encouraging but I reserve the right to be skeptical until I see him on the field, able to run, jump, cut and pivot effectively.

                  • Del tre

                    Nah he’s fine torn ligaments ache like a sun of a gun but when you’re in the moment yu barely feel it. At least that’s how it was for me when I broke my ankle and had ligament damage

                • 75franks

                  I look at” but he’ll make it for camp and be ready to go” as a pretty good sign

                  • franks

                    I’d like to too but Pete is relentlessly optimistic and like most coaches he likes to keep this kind of thing within the circle.

      • mishima

        Can’t win a Super Bowl without him. 😉

  38. Volume12

    Would love DT Cedric Thornton. Highly underrated.

    Hope ‘Bane is back too.

    Posibly bringin’ back the LEO Chris Clemons? I like it,

    As for Frank Clark’s weight loss. I doubt he’s the SAM. That’ll be a committe type thing IMO.

    • franks

      Thonton I think is hands down a better player than Mebane at this point in their careers. If Okung’s back it’s likely one or the other.

    • rowdy

      Still would change are draft needs away from an early LB

      • Volume12

        Yeah- I don’t know about an early LB. I mean, I’m not putting it past them, but look at where they target LB’s.

        IMO they’ll take an athletic freak at LB with length and let Pinkuns, rookie, KPL, and maybe Morgan battle it out.

        • Volume12

          Plus Josh Shirley and Ryan Robinson.

        • CHawk Talker Eric

          Feeney in R3.

          • RealRhino2

            Pass.

    • 75franks

      they sign clemons to mentor clark at leo. I like it

      • Volume12

        Well, with Clemons gone, they didn’t use a LEO, because Avril can’t rush against a LT like he can a RT.

        So, what yor saying makes sense.

        • CHawk Talker Eric

          We’ve said it more than once – pass rushers don’t age the same way other positions do. There’s so much more to beating a blocker than pure athleticism. I could see Clemons having a resurgence of sorts in SEA.

          • franks

            I could see that too.

        • franks

          That’s why Mario would’ve been a great fit and a bargain.

          • Volume12

            Williams would not have been a bargain at $8 mil, and wouldn’t have fit.

            He’s a diva that plays with no motor and takes plays off.

            Seattle will always take a ‘try hard’ over a guy like that.

            • Miles

              There were also reports from players that he was very lazy and that guys with the Bills did not like him. That’s not something the Seahawks usually go for anyway.

              • franks

                The guys on the Bills are underperformers.

            • franks

              That wasn’t the case his other 9 seasons. 14.5 sacks in 2014. Not that we need to think of a way to pressure the QB.

  39. CHawk Talker Eric

    @Rand_Getlin: I’m told QB Brock Osweiler has agreed to a deal in principle with the Houston #Texans.

    Wow. What do DEN do now? Maneuver for one of the top 3 QBs in this draft? Go after RG3??

    • CHawk Talker Eric

      @JasonLaCanfora: The Texans are also hopeful of completing a deal with free agent RB Lamar Miller and have made headway toward securing that as well

      HOU makin’ moves!

      • franks

        The AFC middleweights getting rescaped.

      • Del tre

        Pick up that kid out of Buffalo he can ball Russell Wilson 0.5

    • Volume12

      I thought that might happen.

      Osweiler has his ring, and why would you want to play in the shadow of Peyton Manning? He’ll never do anything right, comparison wise.

      • franks

        20 millions reasons not to, that’s for sure.

    • rowdy

      Kaepernick is rumored to be their plan B

      • CHawk Talker Eric

        Forgot about Kap.

        • franks

          I heard this too.

          • franks

            Kap as plan B.

            • CHawk Talker Eric

              @DrewBoylhart: Jason Cole reports the #49ers are not interested in trading Colin Kaepernick. #NFL

              • franks

                Ahh.

              • franks

                Or is that Balke posturing to get more the Kap is worth

      • CHawk Talker Eric

        @AdamSchefter: With Brock Osweiler off to Houston, RGIII is on Broncos’ list of replacement quarterbacks, per source. Could be visiting Denver.

    • sdcoug

      “Hello Peyton? Yeah, this is John. So…about that retirement thing…”

  40. CHawk Talker Eric

    @AdamSchefter: Matt Forte is signing with the NY Jets, per source.

    • franks

      Dang. Oh well

      • reggieregg

        A lot better than him with the packers or patriots!

        • franks

          Definitely

  41. CHawk Talker Eric

    @caplannfl: #Rams have given QB Case Keenum first-round tender as RFA, source said.

    I’m guessing Case stays a Ram.

  42. CHawk Talker Eric

    Pro day news:

    Col St Linebacker Cory James, who was graded as a potential third-round pick entering the season, ran the forty in 4.57/4.58 after measuring 6010, 229 pounds. His other marks included a vertical jump of 35 inches, a 10-7 broad jump and a terrific 3-cone of 6.67. Scouts commented that James looked fast and fluid during position drills.

    • Volume12

      His tape is pretty good. From 2014 I believe.

      Pursues the ball with passion and speed, and is explosive. Strong at the POA too, which is something you can’t really coach.

      • Attyla the Hawk

        Kind of has a James Harrison vibe to his tape. Plays squat and kind of has the same kind of movement.

        • Volume12

          That’s not a bad comp.

  43. GeoffU

    Graham might be ready for week one?? Wow, how awesome would that be? I hope they don’t rush him back though.

    And Osweiler to the Texans. Who the heck starts for the Broncos now? Dang. I guess when you can win a Super Bowl with nothing but defense though.

    • Miles

      Won’t believe this until it happens.

  44. reggieregg

    Rob….. thanks for the daily fix man. I really appreciate the thought you put into this blog. It’s just enough to keep a Seahawk football junky going during the offseason!

    • Rob Staton

      Thanks man — got a lot to get into when free agency dies down too.

  45. Nathan

    Looks like we miss out on a 3rd round comp next year.

    Broncos have 2 of them, and the Ravens have another.

    • Trevor

      Yeah I think we will end up with a 4th rounder Bruce, 5th rounder Sweezy, 6th Rounder Kearse

    • vrtkolman

      Man the Broncos are getting hammered.

      • Steele

        Good. May they never win again.

  46. CHawk Talker Eric

    @DrewBoylhart: #Rams re-signed WLB Mark Barron. #NFL

    @MikeGarafolo: Updating: DE William Hayes back to the Rams. Done deal.

    • Volume12

      I wonder if Cedric Thornton gets outta big D.

      Jeff Alen off the market too. Going to Houston.

      Just me, or are Houston and Jacksonville gonna battle it out for the AFCS crown?

      • CHawk Talker Eric

        I like either of them over IND or TEN.

    • Steele

      Didn’t think Rams would be dumb enough to let Hayes go. That’s why they let Chris Long walk.

  47. rowdy

    Brock got 4 years 72 mil? Wilson’s contract looks way better now

    • franks

      Yeah doesn’t it? And Brock goes for the money over the chance to win more SBs, who wouldn’t do that for $20M?

  48. The Hawk is Howling

    If we do resign Okung which I guess is best then do we still go Tackle in rd. 1? Rob is liking Nick Martin at center is he worth it at 26? There is a part of me who still longs for Will Fuller, Wilson to Will sounds nice. Imagine him with a healthy P-Rich talk about some speed on the outside! Having “The Visor” Chris Clemons back could be a good thing! Go Team

    • franks

      I’d take either of them although I don’t see either as a need, but I suspect we could get Martin later.

    • Nathan

      Best player available, o lineman or not.

      We just don’t want to be forced into taking a tackle by not having him.

  49. LikwidIce

    Who are your must follow twitter accounts?

    • Collins

      @DavisHsuSeattle and @J********r

      • D

        Danny Kelly (@FieldGulls) does a good job of retweeting lots of relevant information

        • Collins

          Another good account.

          And why was J*********** Twitter account censored?

          • LikwidIce

            Was about to ask about that. Thanks.

          • Rob Staton

            There are very strong reasons why that particular individual does not get publicity on this blog. Davis is a fantastic follow though.

            • Collins

              I do apologize. I wasn’t aware….

              • Rob Staton

                No apology necessary Collins. Won’t go into it on here but wouldn’t do it without reason.

                • Collins

                  I don’t doubt it at all. You’ve always been very professional.

                  Davis is a great follow. Can’t say that enough.

                  • Rob Staton

                    Agree totally.

            • Attyla the Hawk

              Guru catfight!!!

              Where’s the popcorn …

    • LikwidIce

      Any more must follow accounts? @Davishsuseattle looks great. @robstaton is really into football (soccer).

      • Rob Staton

        You do realise that this is Rob Staton’s blog LikwidIce, right? 🙂

        Apologies for the soccer tweets — that’s my day job. If I win the lottery I’ll quit and run this full time.

        • LikwidIce

          Yes, I knew that. I have a hard time getting into soccer… The FIFA match fixing scandals and no hard cap ruin it for me. 🙁

          You have quite a few followers (45k). Are those mostly from soccer or seahawk fans?

          • Rob Staton

            A mix of both.

        • matt

          You do realise that this is Rob Staton’s blog LikwidIce, right? 🙂

          lol

  50. Forrest

    Mebane signed with the Chargers…

    • Dylan

      Sad, Bane a good guy and great Seahawk

      • Forrest

        Well at least they kept Rubin, and depending on what happens with Okung they may consider DT at 26…

        • Rob Staton

          I wouldn’t expect a run-stuffing DT at #26.

          Probably why they’ve shown interest in Cedric Thornton. Expect a a veteran addition and then some pass-rushing help in the early rounds. Kenny Clark might be an option at #56.

          • SeventiesHawksFan

            Agreed. I think we will draft a later round DT to develop and sign a veteran.

          • Jarhead

            If we could lock up Okung, I wouldn’t even mind a slight reach for a high upside interior rush specialist in R1. We can get a C and G in 2/3/4

            • Rob Staton

              “a high upside interior rush specialist”

              Can’t see many of them in this draft.

          • Forrest

            Yeah, that makes sense.

        • GeoffU

          Not too worried. We can get a run stuffer in the mid-late rounds. Rubin was a higher priority. Cedric Thornton is also in play, but I have no idea how good he is, just that he’s much younger than Mebane.

          • C-Dog

            Thornton is a beast of a run defender. Not a pass rusher. Probably the 3 tech in the base with Rubin at the nose.

            • Rob Staton

              After calling Rubin the best three technique they’ve had since 2010 — I doubt they move him off that spot.

              • C-Dog

                I wouldn’t put it past them. Rubin’s been a 1 tech before.

    • SeventiesHawksFan

      Am so very glad they signed Rubin now. That crucial signing means that Mebane’s departure doesn’t mean the front office is now scrambling to fill both first down DT spots. Rubin was the number URFA priority to me for that very reason. Lane and Okung are the next two biggest priorities, though if either of them sign elsewhere, we will still have options.

      • Volume12

        Can’t see this team ever drafting a run stuffer in round 1.

        DT Kenny Clark would be a nice addition.

        • SeventiesHawksFan

          Agreed. I think they’ll sign a veteran and draft a later round DT to develop.

        • Robert

          I wonder about that often. As the game evolves, having a run stuffer that can also provide interior pass rush via penetration or just driving the Guard back into the pocket would sure come in handy when the opposition throws on early downs. On the other hand, if it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it. Cheap FA or mid round Draft DT that can stalemate double teams to replace Mebane and we’re good.

  51. matt

    Mebane is going to look weird in a Chargers jersey. Hope he got paid. Wish him the best!

    Ian RapoportVerified account
    ‏@RapSheet
    The #Chargers announced a 3-year deal for former #Seahawks DL Brandon Mebane… Seattle had tried to keep him.

    • j hawk

      Bane has a home in LA should be a good place for him. Good luck big fella.

      • CharlieTheUnicorn

        And when the Chargers play in LA in 2017, it makes even more sense.

  52. Jarhead

    Why is no one talking about 17 mil a year for an above average pass rusher and just wrecking the market? That is a ludicrous contract. There is no way that a guy like Vernon warrants 17 a year. What is going on in the NFL?

    • Forrest

      Some teams are just desperate (imo).

      • Attyla the Hawk

        Jerry Reese is just complete garbage as a GM. Has lived off the laurels of Accorsi his predecessor to the tune of a couple SB titles.

        He had a good draft in his first year, getting three day 3 picks to develop into starters. Then proceeded to whiff on his next 8 drafts on day three (0 starters).

        His drafts were all or nothing in day 1/2, and just standard attrition due to injuries left that team empty of talent.

        That team was made a joke. And Reese is the direct culprit on that.

        • bobbyk

          Reese doesn’t care about anything other than saving his job. That’s why he’s spending so much. He doesn’t have the long-term interest of the Giants in mind. He only cares about 2016.

          Now, most of us would do the same. I’m just saying if I were the Giants owner, Reese would have been out with Coughlin and the new GM would have gone into this off-season making decisions like Pete and John did all those years ago… not band-aid signings to win this very season.

          • bobbyk

            A young player like Vernon isn’t a “band-aid.” His impact on the salary cap at that kind of money is though.

    • RealRhino2

      I remember hearing Holmgren talk about those “wreck the market” deals. He said when the player came to him with, “This guy got X, so I should get Y!”, Holmgren would say that just because that team was stupid didn’t obligate him to be stupid, too.

  53. nichansen01

    Bane is gone… Maybe we can sign Thorton, Okung and Lane still?

  54. Ed

    Doesn’t look like Okung or Lane are getting much play. Maybe it’s one year prove it friendly deals. If so, really allows the draft to flow for the Hawks

    • Forrest

      If the Hawks can get both Lane and Okung back, and sign one or two 2nd/3rd tier guys, I would count that as a win for FA.

    • SeventiesHawksFan

      Getting Okung back would really take the pressure off in the draft. Getting Lane back means we still have time to develop the stable of young guys and get them healthy. Both would help in different ways, but yes would give us breathing room for sure.

  55. Attyla the Hawk

    Chiefs stripped of their 3rd round pick.

    Our #98 comp pick turns into #97. They picked one pick behind our native.

    • GeoffU

      Why? What happened?

      • Dylan

        For tampering w Maclin in FA last yr

    • Seabean

      That might be relatively significant, as I have always thought the Chiefs and the Seahawks share a certain affinity for certain players.

      • Attyla the Hawk

        They do. But it doesn’t really help all that much for us. Because they pick after us in R3. And before us in R4.

        Only helps our comp pick.

        Sadly, it helps New England doubly so. They now pick after us, and their comp pick is one before us. So they get a double bump.

  56. D

    Sweezy to Bucs according to several reports

  57. Forrest

    Sweeny to Tampa Bay…(in principle)…

    • Forrest

      *Sweezy

      Expected, hopefully that means Okung stays…

  58. TCHawk

    How about Robert Ayers? He had 9.5 sacks last year and is 30 years old. I haven’t heard much about him during this time.

    • lil'stink

      He’d be a nice player, but what with Vernon just got paid I would imagine he will be way too expensive for us.

    • Forrest

      Maybe…if he’s cheap.

      • C-Dog

        Don’t think he’s going to be cheap, though.

    • Steele

      Ayers is going to price beyond the Hawks range, I think. Good, solid player.

  59. bobbyk

    Seriously, I am so thankful Sweezy is gone. Glowinski will be better and much cheaper. I think RG actually improved with him leaving and we all want an improved OL.

    • Ty the Guy

      Don’t agree at all. Sweezy did benefit from having vets around him in his early years, but last season he was surrounding by inexperienced guys. He looked like he was trying to do too much.

      While I didn’t want the Hawks to overpay for him to come back, Sweezy was a solid starter for us. It ain’t easy being Sweezy.

      • bobbyk

        Even if you don’t agree, that doesn’t make me any less happy he’s gone and going to be replaced by Glowinski.

      • franks

        I’m glad he’s gone myself, it seemed like he was as much of the problem as anyone. I can see your point though, I see Lewis that way.

        • Volume12

          For everyone that hates on Seattle’s O-lineman, I think NFL teams feel differently.

          They sure do get some good ‘shmoney’ deals when FA rolls around every year.

          • franks

            Sweezy’s cleaning up that’s for sure.

          • Robert

            They know they can immediately improve the cruddy passpro. Cable is obsessed with rehearsing choreography and nuanced footwork for his ZBS. He could have been great on Broadway!

      • CharlieTheUnicorn

        It ain’t easy being Sweezy. ~ Chester Cheetah

  60. lil'stink

    Reports are that Sweezy is getting just over &7 million APY… wow

    • lil'stink

      That’s $7 million, not &7 million

      • D

        Sweezy seems like the type of guy who accidentally signs for 7 million ampersands.

      • D

        Sorry that was sorta mean…

    • Rob Staton

      Hawkblogger got the Sweezy and Doug Martin deals mixed up. We don’t know the terms of Sweezy’s deal yet.

      • matt

        Sweezy got a 5 year $32.5 mil deal with Tampa. $6.5 mil apy could reap a 4th round comp, but 5th is more likely.

    • vrtkolman

      Seriously, the Seahawks O line has been downright awful for a while now. Why do said linemen attract so much free agent attention? It is really quite strange.

      • Rob Staton

        It wasn’t anywhere near as bad as people thought in 2013 or 2014.

        It was terrible in 2015… but we won’t see Drew Nowak or Justin Britt cashing in any time soon.

        • Robert

          But Drew is very strong and Britt was a tough wrestler! We need to re-think our target criteria!

  61. rowdy

    There has been no talk of kearse lane or okung at all, no rumors or anything. I think okung being his own agent might be part of his reason on there being no leaks but still kind of weird.

  62. HawkfaninMT

    Not much on the wire about Nick Fairley… Anyone?

    I know he isn’t as stout against the run as Bane, but he would be an improvement on Hill, and weaken the Rams a bit if they are making a bid to re-sign him

    • franks

      Don’t think he’s real good anymore, and he never was the hardest competitor.

    • reggieregg

      Definitely an upgrade over Hill

      • franks

        Anyone who plays is an upgrade over last year’s Hill.

  63. franks

    I’ve been keeping a list of players that look good for us and where they might go. Just my opinion but here it is. Open to suggestions especially QB.

    R1 (Trading up)
    Sheldon Rankins DT
    Taylor Decker T
    Jack Conklin T
    Noah Spence DE
    A’Shawn Robinson DT
    Robert Nkemdiche DT
    Ezekial Elliot RB

    1-2 (#26)
    Shon Coleman T
    Germain Ifedi G/T
    William Jackson CB
    Eli Apple CB
    Will Fuller WR
    Keanu Neal S

    2 (Trading up or down)
    Charles Tapper DE
    Emmanuel Ogbah DE
    Joshua Garnett OG
    Ryan Kelly C
    Derrick Henry RB
    Jarran Reed DT
    Chis Jones DT

    2-3 (our 2)
    Connor McGovern RT/G/C
    Auston Johnson DT
    Kenneth Dixon RB
    Nick Martin C
    Javon Hargrave DT
    Nick Vannett TE
    Deion Jones LB

    3-4 (our 3’s)
    Deionde Hall CB
    Landon Turner G
    Sebastin Tretola G
    Adolphus Washington DT
    Eric Striker LB
    Jalen Mills CB/S
    Graham Glasgow G/C
    C.J. Prosise RB

    4
    Harlan Miller CB/NB
    Joe Dahl G
    Vadal Alexander G
    Feeney DE
    John Theus LT

    5
    Brandon Shell G/T
    Pearce Slater RT
    Willie Beavers G
    Ricardo Lewis WR
    Fahn Cooper T

    6
    David Morgan TE
    Stephane Nembot RT
    De’Runnya Wilson WR
    D’Haqquille Williams WR
    Spencer Drango G

    7
    Chase Ferris G
    Keith Lumpkin T
    Vincent Valentine DT
    Dominick Jackson G
    Rees Odhiambo G
    Joe Haeg T
    Drew Kaser P Biggest leg, fastest get-off, Ninja Warrior athleticism, hangtime not great.
    Nick O’Toole P Quick punter, fast runner, problems with accuracy leading to touchbacks and TDs.
    Tom Hacket P Australian rugby-style punter with excellent touch, slow get-off.

    • Trevor

      Great list thanks Frank!

      • franks

        You bet Trevor.

        • Dylan

          I concur w Trevor, great list Franks. One suggested add would be Westerman somewhere in maybe that 2-3 slot.

          • franks

            Forgot about him, don’t think I’d pick him number 2 though.

    • Hawksince77

      This is great.

      Outside of Fuller in the first, you don’t have any WRs until Lewis in the 5th. Do you see any 3/4 round possibilities?

      I thought Peake might be a possibility, but couldn’t get impressed with his tape, so I don’t know. Any other names? Where might North go, do you think?

      • franks

        Didn’t think Kearse would be leaving so I haven’t been looking at WR’s. Still not sure Smith shouldn’t get a chance.

        CBS has North going undrafted just like DOUG BALDWIN. His combine:
        40 Yd 20 Yd 10 Yd 225 Bench Vertical jump Broad Shuttle 3-Cone Drill
        4.48 2.66 1.59 17 35 10’3″ 4.13 6.90

        Peake R4-5.

      • franks

        Rang has Keyarris Garrett from Tulsa rated in rounds 3-4. Great small school production with over 1400 yards. 6’3 220 lbs. with 35.5″ arms and 9″ hands, frame to get bigger.

    • Robert

      I like Spencer Drango. Cruddy Combine number, but a great Olineman. I expect him to go higher.

      • franks

        The knock on him is his lower body strength and athleticism. Reminds me of John Moffitt if he liked working out more.

  64. John_s

    Wow. The Giants are spending money like they got their tax return back! I can’t believe how much the paid janoris Jenkins. To pay Olivier Vernon more tha JJ watt? Craziness

    • franks

      Totally, totally crazy. On top of firing Coughlin for McAdoo.

      • GeoffU

        Yeah but McAdoo is so fun to say, and Coughlin I still don’t think I can pronounce correctly.

        • franks

          hahhaha

    • Steele

      The Giants desperately want their pass rush to be dominant again. Period. It has been the team’s priority every offseason, and they are not happy their D has slipped recently. Not craziness to them.

  65. POB

    What are everyone’s thoughts on Tapper vs. Ogbah? I’ve seen Rob question Ogbah’s motor at times, but he has much better college numbers than Tapper. From the few YouTube clips I’ve seen, Tapper often seems to be the last one off the ball, but I did see a highlight where he chased down Amari Cooper from behind in the 2014 Sugar Bowl. Tapper also seems like a pretty personable dude from a few interviews I’ve seen.

    • Volume12

      2 completely different players.

  66. Rob Staton

    Coby Fleener is getting +$7m APY.

    That’s why the Seahawks aren’t even entertaining the thought of cutting Jimmy Graham.

    • Dylan

      Rob, I feel like these teams are all taking crazy pills! 7m for Fleener?!

      • CharlieTheUnicorn

        When you have money to burn….. burn it

        • Dylan

          And burn they have! Lol.

          • D

            Dont the Saints have one of the worst cap situations in the league? I know they were pretty strapped a few years ago, but that certainly could have changed.

            • GeoffU

              Yeah, someone’s getting put on the ol chopping block.

    • franks

      Not a chance, and Fleenr is nowhere near the player Jimmie is.

      This post has turned into gold man. Great rundown of everything in F.A. so far that matters.

      • Steele

        Fleener has lived off of Luck’s reputation. Not a bad player, but this is FA silly season. I will not be a fan of Jimmy G’s fit with this offense until the day it works out, if it ever does. In the meantime, any talk of letting him go, I’m interested if it frees up cap room. We have seen that in this system, JFG has not been a necessity, nor has he even been much of a threat.

        JFG might earn his “F” on another roster, but here, a very good traditional TE who can block would be better.

        • franks

          I think our offense would click if we had a guy like that, and JFG the move TE.

          • franks

            No not Fleener, no, I meant a good traditional TE.

  67. Volume12

    Keep an eye on L’ville LB James Burgess.

    • oz

      Love me some Yannick!!!

  68. Trevor

    Any details on the Mebane, Sweezy deals? Any chance for comp picks? Looks like the Irivn deal will be a 4th rounder at best given this crazy market. Still can’t believe the Oliver Vernon deal.

    • Greg Haugsven

      It’s outrageous. With all the money being thrown to d lineman how will that affect Bennett. He’s probably getting more pissed off.

  69. Darth12er

    Any chance the NFL will put in a max contract per position, similar to what the NBA does? This whole thing is just getting out of hand.

    • vrtkolman

      No way, let them keep overspending. At some point the cap has to stop going up, and teams are going to be in huge trouble.

      • Greg Haugsven

        It’s getting really out of hand. Feels like the NBA free agency. Mediocre players getting serious coin.

        • Volume12

          The winners of FA are often the teams that don’t do too much.

          Try and take care of your own, get value, and only make shrewd moves,

          • D

            What guys are you keeping your eye on for “bargain bin” pick ups? Im interested to see what some of the older pass rushers get a week down the road (Clem, Long, Wake)

            • reggieregg

              Cameron Wake would be a monster in Seattle

  70. Christian

    The #Bucs paid G JR Sweezy $32.5M over 5 years, source said.

  71. John_s

    Sweezy gets 5 yrs 32.5 mil. Wow.

    • bobbyk

      Crazy that you can not be good at what you do and still get rich.

  72. Steele

    I may be in the minority, but I do not want the Hawks to retain Okung. He just is not worth it. I would rather than take a chance with a plug-in veteran along with a higher draft pick, and see what happens.

    • bobbyk

      I don’t think it’s fair to say that if you don’t actually know what he’s going to cost. I’m with you if he wants $13 million per season. I totally disagree with you if he wants $6 million for ’16. It depends on the contract.

      • franks

        I wouldn’t want him for 6. Cause the playoffs come and we don’t have a LT.

    • j hawk

      I’m with you Steele, Hawks were 10-2 when Okung was out. Often injured and coming off shoulder surgery I say we should move forwards and don’t look back. Hawks were beaten in the middle, should upgrade LG,C, and Glo is an upgrade.

      • bobbyk

        Hawks were beat up the middle. However, part of the reason they weren’t beat from left tackle was because Okung is actually pretty decent when he plays.

        Maybe next year they can improve the middle at the expense of the outside and lose there? I just don’t see how the OL can improve if you’re going to take a big step back at LT. Gilliam will not be nearly as good as Okung.

        You’ve gotta factor in the contract and what he’ll cost. I live Oliver Vernon as much as anyone, but I wouldn’t want that guy on our team under that contract. I’d much rather have Clem at a minimal contract, even if Vernon is clearly better moving forward.

        • j hawk

          I’m with you Steele, Hawks were 10-2 when Okung was out. Often injured and coming off shoulder surgery I say we should move forwards and don’t look back. Hawks were beaten in the middle, should upgrade LG,C, and Glo is an upgrade. I read somewhere that Gilliam was beaten once by a speed rush. He has good footwork and was being groomed for LT. Doing it daily may be another thing. As of right now I would be comfortable with him as a LT. Now Lane may be signed and that may eat up the money that was earmarked for Okung.

          • Steele

            I agree. The focus needs to be upgrading the interior.

            It is a bit dicey to depend on Gilliam to anchor LT. Tough situation. Okung on a cheap, short deal, a place holding thing, fine. But not a big deal. Should they get a veteran stopgap on a cheap deal instead? T definitely looks like a draft priority, but I really want to see them land one of the top three centers, and also one of the top guards, in the draft.

        • franks

          I thought he had a middling year when healthy, and he wasn’t there when the team needed him most. Not to imply that he could’ve helped it.

          If Gilliam’s the guy in the regular season, Gillieam’s the guy in the playoffs.

    • Ed

      Unless Okung and Lane come back on one year prove it deals, I’m good with letting them go too. Worst case on both positions:

      Gilliam for Okung and Bailey for Gilliam

      and

      Shead for Lane (who wasn’t healthy most of the year anyway)

      • bobbyk

        You didn’t get your wish about Lane. I’m glad.

        • bobbyk

          4 years

        • Ed

          I hope it wasn’t a lot and I hope he stays healthy.

          • franks

            I share your skepticism Ed, for me his dependable play isn’t worth a steep premium, because he has an injury history and we have too many CBs with that background. I think SImon starts if healthy.

            • Ehurd1021

              He had a fluke injury in the Super Bowl…. to be honest he shouldn’t have even played last year. How many players break their arm, tear their acl in a matter of seconds on the same play? He was also set back because he ended up dealing with a surgical infection in his arm. Before that Lane was very dependable and he played very well last year coming off his injuries. I don’t see, or do I understand, your arguments about his health or his past. Lane solidifies are secondary and knows the technique and system and he has the ability to cause, or create turnovers, which was talked about as a priority this off-season in interviews with PC.

              Your opinion on Okung is also not very realistic to me also…. he is one of the best left tackles in football and the Seahawks could do a lot worst at that position. You are willing to bring in a new left tackle, into this scheme to protect Wilson’s blind side? I don’t understand why you seem so hell bent on blowing up this team.

              • franks

                If Okung’s gone we’re going into Carolina with the exact same team he did last year, I wouldn’t call firing the guy who always calls in sick “blowing up the team.”

                I’m not calling him injury prone, I’m saying he has a history. Missed half the seaason before that with the groin injury. Think he had some knee issue in college but might be wrong. My point was that he’s the guy because Simon got hurt, and Simon’s back, and neither have shown long term durability.

                • franks

                  referring to Lane in second paragraph

    • Scraps

      Fortunately, Schneider’s plans are never, at the end, “and see what happens.”

    • reggieregg

      I agree…. I wouldn’t be mad if I never had to watch him false start again!

  73. Steele

    The Seahawks really should consider DT Akiem Hicks, who has not signed a new contract with the Patriots and is exploring his options. He is likely available for somewhere in the $5-6M range. He’s young and good, was a major force for NE last season.

    • Rob Staton

      But how good is his gap discipline and run defense?

      That’s the key to any interior D-line signing to replace Mebane.

      • Steele

        Hicks is versatile. I think he is an emerging talent. Pats benefitted greatly.

        http://www.patspulpit.com/2015/12/26/10652000/new-england-patriots-film-room-akiem-hicks-texans-titans-saints

        • Rob Staton

          Versatile is all well and good though — the Seahawks are very strict in what they look for. Any Mebane replacement has to have very strong gap discipline and be incredibly stout vs the run.

          • Volume12

            Hearing Chicago and Akeem Hicks.

      • Del tre

        I mean if he is on the pats for BB he would have to be people who aren’t disciplined don’t exactly stick around there long

        • Rob Staton

          It depends what his role was though. BB has seemed to favour interior rushers inside (Malcom Brown, Dominique Easley — two first round picks). How are they using Hicks? I have no idea personally. But if he’s being used to rotate around an aggressive interior push then that’s very different to what Seattle wants in base — and it’s why they seem to be looking instead at Cam Thomas and Cedric Thornton.

  74. Troy

    Lane just re-upped with the Hawks! You called it Rob, along with Rubin!

    • Rob Staton

      This is big news for the Hawks.

      • rowdy

        Lane rubin and okung is who I wanted to keep most

      • Scraps

        And those people who always say “you can’t trust Rapaport”, nobody is saying that now….

    • SeventiesHawksFan

      Nice call, Rob. I didn’t think the cap room would be there to keep him. This is such excellent news! If they can Okung and a free agent DT signed it’ll have been a very successful free agency.

  75. CharlieTheUnicorn

    Just saw a tweet by Rapapport saying Lane is going to stay with Seattle. Stay tuned!

    • bobbyk

      Sweet!

  76. Volume12

    Seahawks are keeping CB Jeremy Lane.

    Yes!

    • bobbyk

      That’s huge.

      • bobbyk

        I was worried he was going to go to Oakland.

    • Volume12

      4 year deal.

      • Rob Staton

        Even better. Nice to have some consistency at cornerback.

        • bobbyk

          Cross off the need for a CB with an early pick.

          • rowdy

            Didn’t see that happening anyways but I’m very happy with lane. He has probowl potential if he can stay healthy

          • Volume12

            They were never gonna take a CB early.

            • CharlieTheUnicorn

              This is truth. Now, time to go SPARQ CB shopping in the 5th or 6th round of the draft.

          • Hawksince77

            I don’t think so. The key is Okung. If they re-sign Okung (or don’t feel like they need to use their first or second pick on the offensive line) then CB is still in play, IMO.

            It’s not like the Seahawks are flush with starting CB talent. Sherman, Lane and…who? Shead? not so much. Simon? Perhaps.

            And despite the bevy of up and coming players on the roster, none of them indicate starting potential (at least as far as we know).

            Bottom line: if they can go for the best player in the first, it might be CB.

            • Rob Staton

              I wouldn’t expect this team to ever draft a CB in round one unless it was a truly exceptional talent. I understand it’s not part of their philosophy and they believe they can wait and look for their guys (as they’ve proven).

              There certainly isn’t anyone in this draft that would make me think they’ll go CB before day three.

              • Hawksince77

                This is where we disagree, and I could be completely wrong, but this year is different than the past (and I have followed every PC/JS draft very closely so I am aware of the history).

                In previous years they had starting corners they liked, until last year. The Cary Williams signing really hurt them early, and they are in a similar situation this year at the position. No established starter, with only unproven talent at 2 of the 3 critical positions (Sherman, Lane…Simon?)

                The secondary has always been of primary importance in this defense, and it still is. The most important position group to reinforce this year is the offensive line. After that, the secondary.

                You can get good offensive linemen throughout the draft, with the exception of LT. CB, on the other hand, is a premium position where the best players generally go early. Richard Sherman is the exception, not the rule.

                The starting LCB for PC was a first round draft pick (Trufant, if memory serves). Once Sherman locked down the left, they succeeded with Brandon and then Maxwell. They don’t have a replacement at RCB on the roster. They can get by with Simon/Shead/Lane/Burley, but they could definitely upgrade the position in this draft, early.

                After the o-line, what other position offers that kind of opportunity? You have asserted there are no top pass rushers worthy of the first round, nor run-stuffing DTs. As for the skilled positions on offense, we have been over that. Who in this draft is so much better than Lockett/Baldwin/Richardson/Rawls that would make spending a first round draft pick worth it?

                If Okung doesn’t re-sign, I understand the need, and probability of drafting an offensive tackle with the first pick. But if he does sign, that leaves a need at LG. I doubt the Seahawks spend a first round pick on a guard. Not necessary, even if they plan to draft one to start at the position.

                No, if Okung re-signs, the best value for the Seahawks is to take a top CB that meets their criteria.

                Of course all of this is crap if the Seahawks have developed guys over the past year or two they really like, to your point about their philosophy in developing players at the position.

                So like anything, this is just another casual fan’s opinion, one that we get to see turn out right or wrong within so many weeks.

                • Robert

                  Byron Maxwell another exception? Walter Thurmond?

                • Rob Staton

                  Hawksince77 — just a bit of info I received a while ago.

                  The Seahawks will not take a cornerback in round one unless their level of athleticism is Patrick Peterson-esque.

                  And even then that player is likely to go in the top five.

                  I’m willing to wager we will never, ever see the Seahawks go cornerback in round one. Especially not this year.

                  • 503Hawk

                    Agreed. Just in case Hawksince77 takes your bet what is the exchange rate
                    $ to £. (Sorry, couldn’t resist). 🙂

                    • Rob Staton

                      I prefer to use the international betting currency of… ‘a coke’. 🙂

                  • franks

                    And even then, if the attitude isn’t there (Jimmie Smith), pass.

                    Good info.

            • Volume12

              No rookie corner is gonna step in and play from day one.

              I’ll bet ya they have more trust in guys that have been in the system for a year or more like Simon, Seisay, SJB, and Smith.

              Seisay is part of this draft class.

              • Hawksince77

                That could be true, but we have seen them start rookies many times. Thomas, for example.

                Also, Sherman started as a rookie halfway through the season (after Trufant and then Thurmond were injured) so it has happened.

                And even if they don’t start a first round CB on day one, that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t draft the player. They have also taken players with their first pick and haven’t started them (Richardson, Clark, although both second rounders, although they really didn’t start Irvin as a rookie), so there is precedent there as well.

              • Hawksince77

                But I also need to agree. It’s very possible one of these guys has developed into a starting talent at the position, and if that is the case, there would be no reason to double down with the draft capital at the position.

            • Robert

              Cmon, Pete is the DB whisperer.

          • franks

            That would be preferable. Simon to me is a plus starting corner. I understand Lane’s appeal but he could get hurt (and has) just as easily as Simon did. Waiting to see how much cap Lane ties up.

      • Volume12

        I don’t think people realize how huge that is.

        This team is built on it’s defense and it all starts on the back end.

        Now let’s get Okung taken care and get anothet steal at DT to replace ‘Bane.

        • rowdy

          Get okung and we signed the I wanted most. Lane is a great peice and can play inside and out. I see the dropping him inside in nickel and that versatility is what makes him so important

      • D

        Wow, longer than people on here were thinking. First time in a while that the CB opposite Sherm will be the same for an extended time.

        • D

          I bet the $ is a bit higher than people were expecting as well.

        • Hawksince77

          More likely, Lane starts inside, with Simon (or a player yet to be named) starts at RCB. Not that he can’t be a starter there – I suspect Lane will be moved inside more than outside.

          Or I am completely wrong. 🙂

          • Volume12

            I think it’ll depend in the opponet and what their WR core looks like.

            If they got a small, shifty receiver they use in the slot, it’ll be Lane. If they play a team that uses size in the slot, whoever wins the other starting corner spot.

            Just my 2 cents worth.

            • rowdy

              That’s my opinion as well

            • Hawksince77

              I think that’s right, and why I think Lane will play mostly in the slot, with Simon lined up outside against the taller WRs. I think Lane is actually the better CB, but the outside guys get more help in the scheme (I think). The slot guy seems to get a lot of action in this defense.

          • Ehurd1021

            They didn’t just give Lane a 4 year deal to be a slot Cornerback…. He played very well last year and earned that starting job… I think it is his position to lose (competition.) Simon is not a slot CB – doesn’t have the ability to cover smaller, quicker guys.

            We still have a need at slot CB – I really hope the Seahawks take a flyer out on Walter Thurmond again… we was solid last year.

            • Volume12

              They aren’t gonna have money to tie up in 3 starting CB’s.

              That’s why spending a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd on one makes no sense. It’s also why they stockpile them and develop corners.

              There’s a starting corner on this team.

              No roikies are worth a pick before day 3 in this draft cornerback wise. Matter of fact, I bet a rookie corner doesn’t even make the team this year. They’ll still draft one, but not every rookie is gonna make it.

              • C-Dog

                I’ve heard it mentioned a few times on the radio that they like Tye Smith as a potential slot guy. What makes Lane a great signing, IMO, is that he can play well outside and at slot. Versatility is a major asset.

            • Del tre

              I would like to see tye smith be the new slot corner

    • vrtkolman

      This is big news. In my opinion he was the biggest impact free agent we had, even moreso than Bruce.

      • Steele

        I’m glad they kept Lane. They need stability in the slot, and he provides that.

        The next order of business is who plays outside opposite Sherman. And whether further depth is needed inside.

        What we don’t want is to see Sherman having to help out inside. Keep him where he belongs, let him focus, and maybe the old Sherman swag will be back. I mean really back.

  77. bobbyk

    Anyone else find it kind of funny that Clem is taking a visit? Shouldn’t they just be able to call him and his agent up and talk numbers over the phone? It’s not like they are going to take him on a tour of the VMAC for the first time and try to sell him on what he already doesn’t know.

    • Rob Staton

      They might want to do a medical. He is 35-year-old in October after all.

      • bobbyk

        True. Maybe they are ready to sign him on the spot if he passes it.

      • Jarhead

        Haha Jeez Rob that isn’t THATold. Considering I will be going through the same thing then. I hope he brings his walker. Haha

    • rowdy

      Probably a physical and stuff like that. The fact their bringing him tells me they want test him and a deal is likely if he passes

      • Hawkfan086

        Do we think it’s run the ten yard split to see if he still has it or just a physical…wouldn’t we just call Gus and say any news on Clem? Just getting an opinion here.

        • rowdy

          They would probably run some drills on him, just my opinion but why else bring him in?

  78. nichansen01

    Just resign Okung and we are good. Enough options throughout the draft to replace Mebane of the d-line, and if Clemons is healthy he would be a nice addition for leadership.

    • Rob Staton

      The draft has depth on the D-line — but they have consistently looked for veterans up front in base. I think it’s almost certain they address that in FA one way or another.

    • Volume12

      PC wants youth at every level of his defense, but he’s more than comfortable with vets on the D-line,

      Seattle will take full advantage of the depth at DT this year IMO,

  79. coachmattson

    Rob,
    Thanks so much for including free agency on your website this year! Last year I had to ask questions about free agency in the comments section. This year you are doing stories on it!

    Much appreciated! Love the site! Go Hawks!!

  80. nichansen01

    Do we have enough cap space to sign Okung, Thorton and Clemons? I can’t imagine Clemons would cost much at the age of 35…

    • Greg Haugsven

      We should. Clemons might even be worth an MSB contract. If so his net cap hit wouldn’t be much more that 2-3 hundred thousand.

  81. Rob Staton

    OK it’s 2am here guys. I won’t be updating the thread if anything else happens today but I’ll pick it up in the morning. Keep the discussion flowing and use this as an open thread.

    • CharlieTheUnicorn

      Sleep well in bloody England!

      • Volume12

        Thanks my man. For everything.

        May images of Hawks in college navy and wolf grey dance in your head.

    • rowdy

      Thanks for you hard work!

  82. C-Dog

    Jeremy Lane re-signs, 4 years. Great job. Now get Okung done.

    • franks

      If the one doesn’t preclude the other (crossing fingers)

      • Greg Haugsven

        Lane, Rubin, and Okung were argueably the 3 most important. 2 down, 1 to go.

        • GeoffU

          Agree completely. I’m ecstatic that this is a four year deal! Huge bonus, I was expecting a 1-2 year.

          Hopefully Okung signs for a reasonable price.

        • franks

          For me, Okung was important to not siign. No more musical chairs on the Line for me I want the same guys all year.

    • Trevor

      That is great news!!!

      Now if we re-sign Okung they can basically take whomever they want in the draft with no pressure on a glaring need at one position.

      • C-Dog

        Exactly.

      • Del tre

        Well left guard

  83. bankhawk

    Rob,
    Thank you so much for all you do. Dont know hơ you find the time, truly a labor of love!
    Also, a shout out to some ò the amazingly knowledgeable regulars (lôking at you Vol 12).
    Bankhawk.

    • Volume12

      T.

      • Volume12

        * Thanks.

  84. Volume12

    Seahawks now have 9 of 11 defense starters back, and 10 of 11 backups.

    Still got the draft, the depth at CB, and developmental guys like AJ Francis, Eric Pinkins, Josh Shirley, Ryan Robinson.

    Wow!

    • Trevor

      Great points Vol and you know they will draft at least one or two impact guys on defense.

    • bobbyk

      Even more important that having 9 of 11 defensive starters back is that of that scenario, they also have their best 8 starters back (top 7 if you think Irvin was better than Lane… I don’t). Even better is that Clark isn’t considered a starter, but we all know he’s going to take off and have a great year, too. Things are looking good defensively.

    • Hawksince77

      So draft William Jackson in the first (to start at RCB with Lane in the slot) and Deion Jones in the second to start at LB, and the defense is set! (Assuming they can fix the o-line in FA – come on Okung!)

    • matt

      “Seahawks now have 9 of 11 defense starters back, and 10 of 11 backups.”

      Got to love that! The defense is primed to continue the streak of least points allowed. Time to pay Bennett and Kam.

  85. cha

    Paul Kuharsky ‏@PaulKuharskyNFL
    The Titans have agreed to terms with receiver Rishard Matthews on a three-year deal. http://es.pn/1QEY5L9

    • Hawksince77

      Hopefully this is good for the Seahawks, in that they have good starting WRs in Baldwin, Richardson and Lockett, with up and coming UW UDFAs Smith and Williams. Add one more mid-round draft pick and a bunch of UDFAs and they should be set at the position.

      • franks

        It looks to me like we’re pretty set at WR. It’ll be a battle to make the roster.

        • matt

          JS will add a few names to the WR competition before camp to make it an even bigger battle.

          • Volume12

            They’re gonna take a WR higher than expected.

            Gotta get RW another weapon.

            • franks

              I wouldn’t be surprised.

              • franks

                not surprised either way it’s not as clear cut as the OL to me where they 100% need to upgrade

      • Donald

        I disagree, they only have 2 starting caliber WR talent with proven ability, Baldwin and Lockett. Thats it. Richardson is fast but with several knee surgeries we can’t count on him to be healthy. Smith and Williams are nobody, just another UW guy that dawg fans root for.

        Hawks need to draft 2 good WR’s, 1 with the top 4 picks, and the other could be 6-7 rd.

        • Volume12

          Can’t see them drafting 2.

          I do think they’ll take one somewhere in the 1st 4 rounds, and add an UDFA.

        • franks

          Like Vol. I couldn’t see them setting out to pick 2. Now if they got one early on and another fell to the, maybe.

          Baldwin and Kearse were nobodies, Richardson was too, the guy in r6-7 will be a nodody too. Smith and Williams haven’t shown it yet but they have had their moments and they know the system. I don’t see either of them getting beat out by a sixth rounder.

    • matt

      The Titans offense looks a helluva lot better today than 2 days ago. Like what they’re doing in Tennessee. Mariota, Murray, Wright, DGB, Matthews, Walker. Nice weaponry for Mariota! Some OL help and they could put up some big points next year.

    • Steele

      I didn’t see Rishard as a fantastic option. Too slow.

  86. Baldwin

    Looking ahead as I’m sure JS/PC are this draft, who are our critical 2017 FAs? Just Baldwin and Gilliam? Anyone I’m missing? Hill, Willson, Richardson and Shead are somewhere between decent role players and replacement level depending on health IMO. Britt can get a job selling insurance.

    Hope we resign Okung for stability and draft flexibility this year but also don’t want to pay LT money for Gilliam next off season. Not after seeing this spending spree.

    • C-Dog

      Baldwin is the big one. Depends on how the others emerge.

    • matt

      Gilliam and Shead will be RFA’s. You could add Housh$ to the UFA list. The core is pretty well locked in.

    • Robert

      Britt selling protection? The irony is so thick, you can cut it with a knife!

  87. Fatty Acid

    Franks, they signed your boy Hass!! Haha. Seriously though, that’s a cool cool move by the Hawks! Retire a Hawk!

    • franks

      Dude if this was a prank you got me haha I googled haselbeck even though I knew he joined ESPN thought maybe it he was “looking off” the haters

      • Darth12er

        I’ve seen it mentioned a couple times that he signed a 1 day contract to retire a Seahawk. But I cannot find real proof yet.

        • Rob Staton

          He said in an interview with KJR he’d like to do it (sign a one-day contract to retire a Hawk) but as far as I’m aware that offer hasn’t been extended at this point. It’s likely something they do down the line when FA has quietened down — it won’t be at the top of Seattle’s list of priorities right now.

  88. reggieregg

    Anybody else high on Cyrus Jones. He looked great at the combine and even better today at Alabama pro day! Not sure if he’s got the 32 inch arms but he’s gonna be a great slot corner which is what we need. We got a whole farm of sherman clones already!

    • matt

      Jones falls short of 32″ arms-31.375″.

      • reggieregg

        Does that apply for slot corners you don’t need long arm and a long body to play the slot. That might be where we messing up at. Walter Thurmond has 32 inch arms?

  89. Hughz

    I’m dying to know what deal Lane got.

    • Hughz

      I had a dream last night they signed him to a 4yr/$22M.

    • matt

      Looks like we’re going to have to wait til tomorrow. :/

      • KyleT

        4 years 28: 4.5, 6.5, 8 and 9 is my guess.

  90. Dylan

    Some smoke around nick perry to Hawks

    • C-Dog

      Yeah, I just caught that. Pete would know him well. Maybe a rush end, or perhaps even a SAM candidate.

      • Miles

        He ran in the 1.5s at the combine (10 yard split).

        • C-Dog

          Yeah, he’s an athlete.

          • Volume12

            Wouldn’t be mad at that.

            He’s been somewhat disapointing in GB, but that could be all scheme based and what DC Dom Capers asks of him.

            Could just be a one year ‘prove it’ deal that we see Seattlesign guys to every year on the defensive side of the ball.

            He’d be a SAM in our defense.

            • C-Dog

              That’s what I think.

              • Robert

                USC Monte Kiffin connection. Seahawky combine numbers!

            • Volume12

              Although, what’s he weigh?

  91. reggieregg

    Here’s my shot in the dark
    Rd.1 Taylor Decker
    Rd.2 Nick Martin
    Rd.3 Javon Hargrave
    Rd. 3 Jaylon Ramsey
    Rd. 4 Cyrus Jones
    Jonathan Williams ( the better razor “rb”)
    Best available project for cable
    Take a flier on the driskell kid

    • reggieregg

      Oops that Jaylon Smith for our 3rd round comp

      • Miles

        Nick Martin in Round 2 would be so great! On Smith, I wouldn’t be looking for guys that can’t play in 2016 in Round 3. Round 5 would be a good spot for that kind of pick. I suspect Jaylon will get drafted late 4th, early round 5.

    • Trevor

      I would be happy with those first 3 rounds

      • 503Hawk

        I’d take that

  92. smitty1547

    How about Pot Roast for a Bane replacement? Is Josh Shirley more a will or a Sam?

    • CHawk Talker Eric

      Shirley might be an OTTO.

      @MySportsUpdate: Terrance Knighton and the Raiders have had mutual interest, source said.

      • C-Dog

        Jack Del Rio was his head coach in Jacksonville. Seems like a natural fit.

        I’d be happy with Cedric Thornton as a base down starter, high energy player against the run. Could be a better 3 tech than nose, but they can slide Rubin to nose.

        • Steele

          The Raiders have money to burn. That’s what comes with losing.

  93. nichansen01

    my (way too early) play off predictions for next season:

    AFC:
    North: Pittsburgh Steelers 13-3
    South: Houston Texans 12-4
    East: New England Patriots 12-4
    West: Oakland Raiders 11-5
    Wildcard 1: New York Jets 11-5
    Wildcard 2: Jacksonville Jaguars 10-6

    NFC
    North: Minnesota Vikings 12-4
    South: Carolina Panthers 14-2
    East: New York Giants 10-6
    West: Seattle Seahawks 13-3
    Wildcard 1: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 11-5
    Wildcard 2: Atlanta Falcons 10-6

    • Hughz

      Vikings over packers?

      • CharlieTheUnicorn

        Something tells me the Packers offense will get it back in gear this year. The Vikings will be a handful, if they can get the defense straightened out a bit.

        • Steele

          I’m not sure about GB. They suffered from deeper problems that didn’t appear easy to solve.

      • Volume12

        Atlanta over GB and Washington?

  94. Josh emmett

    Bye bye Brandon mebane, thanks for all the productive years with the Hawks! So what’s the solution here? It seems the Hawks love the veterans on the Dline. I want to see them snag a 3 down DT that can rush the passer and blow up guards in the run game in the draft. As rob has been saying not too many interior pass rushers. I was snooping around and came across Javon Hargrave, small school cat out of SCSU. Looked like he tested well and was in the top tier of sparqed out prospects at Dline. Watched some highlights and it was him blowing those small school guards off the line with one hand! Haha, late round gem?

    • C-Dog

      I think probably a 3rd rounder. He showed really well at the Shrine game, and again at the combine. I think the only knock on him is his arms are a bit short. But the stats don’t lie. He was a beast in college.

      • Madmark

        the only knock on Hargrave is the lack of competition when he played.

        • C-Dog

          Not if you include his fine game against Clemson.

  95. oz

    I would be surprised if he was still there at #90

  96. EranUngar

    Mebane contract – 3 years, up to $13.5 million with $5.5 million guaranteed.

    4.5M APY should yield a 6th round comp pick.

    As much as i hate to see an icon go, it’s the right move.

    • EranUngar

      Very close to Rubin’s contract (after state tax…).

      I wonder what the seahawks offered him. Could it be a reaction to Mebane refusing to restructure last year?

  97. EranUngar

    Still available after the first wave of FA deals:

    OT – Okung, Andre Smith, Donnald Penn and Kelvin Beachum (my favorite pick after Okung)

    G/C – Evan Mathis, Jahri Evans, Stefen Wisniewski.

    DT – Nick Fairley, B.J. Raji, Terrance Knighton, Cedric Thornton, Jarvis Jenkins.

    DE – Chris Long, Robert Ayers (yes please…), Akiem Hicks and Clem.

    As the markets calms down, one of those could still end in green and blue for a team friendly number.

    • Rob Staton

      The only two in the list I’d really want to be honest are Okung and Cedric Thornton.

  98. Trevor

    The 2012 Seahawks draft given a failing grade by all national pundits is the measuring stick by which all future Hawks drafts will be measured.

    ’12 draft class has 6 players who got huge 2nd contracts: Bruce Irvin, Wagner, Wilson, Jaye Howard, Jeremy Lane, JR Sweezy. Strong

  99. Trevor

    With the way the Browns have just let some of their best players walk in free agency despite having $ you have to think Joe Thomas is on the trading block and they are in serious rebuild mode. Any interest? His cap # looks cheap given the free agent #.

    Would he be available for a 2016 2nd + 2017 3rd?

  100. Trevor

    Really hope they get Okung signed today so they can follow normal operating procedure and just draft the guys they want without a glaring position need.

    When I think about the one time they clearly have appeared to draft for position need in Britt things did not work out well.

    • Rob Staton

      I think a lot of Seattle’s pick have been for need. They were determined to go T, FS in 2010. They wanted run blockers in 2011. In 2012 they wanted speed in the front seven. I think the true ‘go for the guy we like’ picks are guys like Christine Michael, Paul Richardson, Golden Tate, Tyler Lockett and Frank Clark.

      • Trevor

        Yes but in 2010 we had our choice of Tackle or Safety because we picked so early in those cases they still got the player they wanted. With Britt they were running out of options and he was a major reach as a result. I don’t want them to be in the same situation this year if the top Tackles are all of the board.

        • Trevor

          We assume Coleman or Ifedi will be there at 26 but it is not a lock. That being said I think Coleman could really slide because of the injury and not being able to workout. I think if he had gone to combine and pro day he would have been a big riser.

  101. Seabean

    Brandon Browner officially released. Don’t think he is much of an option for the Seahawks at this point, but I thought I would keep everyone apprised of the original LOB members.

    • Seahawcrates

      I’ve often wondered if Browner could make the switch to strong safety.

      • 503Hawk

        I was just thinking about how his physical presence has been missed. Remember how he blew up THREE Cardinals in under 5 SECONDS! Why not try him at SS. He always has been better in limited space.

        • Seahawcrates

          That is probably my favorite insignificant clip ever!

  102. J

    OT but nice numbers from Dom Williams at his pro day – 4.4 forty, 40.5 inch vertical, 125 inch broad.

    • J

      6.8 three cone, 4.24 shuttle.

© 2024 Seahawks Draft Blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑