On Wednesday I wrote a piece explaining why I was intrigued to see the Seahawks play without Charles Cross.

The point I was making is — I don’t think Charles Cross is as good as some people think. I don’t think he’s developed much in four years in Seattle and I’m hesitant to make him a $30m left tackle (which I assume is the price-range he will want if contract talks happen in the off-season).

There’s supporting evidence to this theory as I highlighted in the article. He wasn’t included in ESPN’s top-10 pre-season offensive tackles, per polling of league execs, scouts and coaches. He wasn’t even in the six subsequent honourable mentions.

I don’t think his play has improved much since that poll, if at all. He’s only graded as PFF’s 26th best tackle for 2025.

I haven’t been arguing that he should be replaced. I just don’t think enough of a conversation is had about his play and his worthiness for a big extension next off-season (especially with two years of club control remaining in Seattle’s back pocket).

I’m surprised nobody else seems to talk about it. There’s a conventional wisdom, locally and nationally, that Cross is an excellent player. Albert Breer, for example, has repeatedly called Cross a ‘franchise left tackle’ this week. Nearly all the talk going into the game was about the loss of Cross being a massive blow.

I thought this game was a great test of the two theories.

If Josh Jones performed very poorly in relief, it would highlight that even if Cross isn’t necessarily an elite player at his position, he was still markedly better than the next player on the depth chart. That could arguably warrant a significant investment because left tackle isn’t a position to take lightly.

If Jones basically played at the same level as Cross, or better, what then? Does it perhaps suggest we should have a bigger conversation about Cross? Spend more time analysing the player we see in 2025, compared to the one who entered the league in 2022? Should it really be such an assumption he gets a big new contract in 2026? Especially when many assumed he would’ve already been rewarded this year?

Jones gave up zero sacks, two pressures and two hurries against the Rams. Cross has only given up two sacks in 14 games this season. He’s averaged 1.3 hurries per game and 1.7 pressures. So it’s somewhat similar.

Jones’ PFF grade for the game was a 75.9. Cross hasn’t had a grade that high since week one against the 49ers.

His run-blocking grade was a 70.4 — four of Cross’ 14 games have had a higher grade this season and his overall run-blocking grade for the year is a 66.7.

Regulars know I detest PFF grades and I think for good reason — they are clearly nonsense in many cases, such as Byron Murphy getting a 48.8 grade against the Colts only for Mike Macdonald to say in the aftermath that he single-handedly won Seattle the game.

However, I think this is slightly different — because I’m comparing two players graded in the same system. So even if by and large PFF grades are ridiculous and untrustworthy, I can still look at how they’re assessing these two players.

Based on the data here, not just the grading, there was no big drop-off.

This is just one game. For the purpose of this subject, I’m eager to see more from Jones. Not because I want to see him replace Cross permanently — and not because I want to get rid of Cross or make some point about him being no good. I don’t think any of those things.

I’m just surprised at the lack of discussion around his development, which I think has been underwhelming. I believe we’re still waiting for him to show he’s taken a step forward as a player. I think there’s an assumption on his performance level which is inaccurate. It’s one reason, I think, why he wasn’t extended in 2025 yet I think it’s fairly certain Jaxon Smith-Njigba will get a new deal next summer.

If Jones plays as well against the Panthers and possibly 49ers, to provide a three-game example, it might suggest Cross is closer to his talent level than say Andrew Thomas of the Giants. I remain unconvinced that he’s as good as many others do after watching his replacement basically produce the same performance.