Category: Main (Page 6 of 78)

Curtis Allen’s Watch Points (Week Thirteen vs Vikings)

This is a guest article by Curtis Allen…

There is always something very familiar about the Vikings whenever they are matched up with the Seahawks.

Whether it is a rematch of a particularly hard-fought game, encountering each other when playoff implications are on the line or a player who is facing his old team — the matchup always seems to have an extra something to it.

Today’s game checks all three of those boxes.

Last season’s Week 16 game cemented the Vikings as a top seed and was another game Seahawks fans came away from thinking ‘if only.’  This season it appears the fortunes have reversed for these two franchises as their paths have diverged wildly after two of the bigger offseason makeovers in the NFL.

As a result the Seahawks are firmly in the Wild Card race and are trying to keep up with the Rams.  The Vikings have lost five of their last six.  Their Turnover Differential in that stretch is a dismal -10 and their Quarterback situation – the envy of the NFL last year – has turned sour, while Sam Darnold has found a home and a very effective system in Seattle.

Undrafted Rookie Max Brosmer will be making his first NFL start at Quarterback and the Vikings are struggling to put a healthy Offensive Line together.

This should be a comfortable win for the Seahawks.  If not with a wide margin on the scoreboard, with statistics and the knowledge that they have the game in hand.

How can they do that?

Exercise Patience on Offense

The Vikings’ last three losses (to Baltimore, Chicago and Green Bay) have been remarkably similar.  Their opponents have made a firm commitment to run the ball and would not waver despite not regularly gashing the Viking defense on the ground.

The Vikings currently sit at #12 on run defense with 4.0 yards per rush conceded.  Yet these three teams only were able to gain 3.73 yards per carry in their wins.  So where was the effectiveness?

First Downs and explosive runs.

Those three teams recorded 37 First Downs on the ground.  Despite their low average conceded, the Vikings currently sit at #30 in the NFL with 99 Rushing First Downs conceded (they are two short of being dead last).

They also recorded 11 runs of ten yards or more in those three games.  The Vikings are #24 in the NFL in explosive runs conceded with 40 on the season (Seahawks defense is #2 with only 20).

It is not hard to see the Seahawks queuing up a ‘hat on a hat’ blocking scheme with Robbie Ouzts leading the way for a healthy gain, not unlike this run by Keaton Mitchell three weeks ago.

Frankly, this is right in the Seahawks’ wheelhouse.  They are the #1 run-committed team in the NFL currently.  They just need to keep grinding away at it.  Since they are wearing their Throwbacks, they can look back to the time Marshawn Lynch would batter defenses for three quarters, not getting big yardage or many breakaways but then put the game away by running through a worn-out defense late.  That mentality would serve them very well.

There is a flipside to this — and another reason why they will need patience — the Vikings have conceded the fewest explosive pass plays in the NFL, with only 27 (for reference, Jaxon Smith-Njigba has 21 himself so far this season).

There is some context to this.  The Vikings blitz at an incredibly high rate (42.9% of plays) and generate regular pass pressure.  When they are not blitzing, they are giving you blitz looks and then backing out of them to keep the offense guessing.

They are in the middle of the pack when it comes to sacks but the blitzing is more of a total defense tool to influence offenses into the plays they want to defend – shorter plays in front of them they can limit the damage on.

One side effect of this play is they only have three interceptions on the whole season.  They are sacrificing one stat for more overall effectiveness.

That is not to say the Seahawks should not attempt any deep passes to Smith-Njigba or the other receivers.  It is just a strong recommendation that they can find success if they play deliberately and pick their spots.

While Sam Darnold’s effectiveness when being blitzed is dramatically worse than when teams do not, this can be balanced a bit by a plan that is run-heavy and allows him to use his quick release and familiarity from being around the Vikings to take some shots.

A second side effect of their constant blitzing and forcing teams into shorter throws?  They do not gain a significant advantage when they do blitz:

Those numbers are nearly identical.  If Darnold can find his quick-twitch targets like Cooper Kupp and A.J. Barner, they can move on this defense with ease.

If they can time up a screen pass to Rashid Shaheed or Kenneth Walker on a blitz by the Vikings, they could run all day there.

It does require patience though.  This game should be a runaway win — but it may take a little more hammering at the boulder to get it to split than it normally does.

Dealing With a Rookie Quarterback

It is always a challenge to see what a new Quarterback brings to the offense.  All the Seahawks have to work from is Brosmer’s college tape, some preseason reps and the eight passes he has thrown in the NFL.

I doubt that Kevin O’Connell is going to go to one extreme or the other with Brosmer.  He will not put training wheels on him, nor is he likely to ask him to throw forty passes either.  That said, the Vikings are one of the NFL’s most pass-dependent offenses.  Look for a lot of screen passes and other motions to make the game slow down a bit for Brosmer.  Having Ernest Jones back will be a great help in this area.  He has a quickness in diagnosing and attacking ball-carriers that can prevent the Vikings from gaining momentum with Yards after the Catch.

Typically, when a rookie or a backup enters the game, defenses call off the blitzing dogs a bit.  Young, untested players may have a hard enough time adapting to standard coverages and the speed defenders play with in the NFL.

This fits nicely with the Seahawk defense already, as they are a high-pressure, low-blitz defense.  I have no doubt Mike Macdonald will still have a blitz package at times, but may reserve it for key situations.

The Vikings run about 60% of their offense out of shotgun.  With Brosmer in, look for that number to grow to around 75-80% to give him as much processing time as possible.

With their speed on defense, a few key downs may be won by putting a press coverage plan in play to disrupt the timing of some passes and make Brosmer scramble a bit and go to his second or third read.  While he may occasionally make a play in this manner, the odds are good the defense can control this game and give the offense more shots to score points.

This is where the offense may help the defense even more than the defense can help itself.  One of the best ways to put pressure on a young Quarterback is on the scoreboard and on the clock.  If the offense can build a two or three score lead with a 9-minute drive or two while the Brosmer is getting settled in, the margin for error gets slimmer and the pressure will grow mightily.

Curtis Allen: Some Thoughts on the Seahawks’ 2026 Salary Cap

This is a guest article by Curtis Allen…

With the trade deadline passing, the balance of the Seahawks’ salary cap spending is limited to Practice Squad movement and short-term replacements for players put on Injured Reserve.  It is a good spot to check on the status of their salary cap for next season.

By virtue of their two-year roster makeover that removed some of the team’s more expensive contracts, some excellent drafting and effective Free Agent spending, the team’s salary cap stands in excellent overall health.

Have a look at what is on the table for 2026:

Whereas last year the Seahawks started out the season under the cap, this year they are comfortably over and have plenty of room to take care of their needs.

Anthony Bradford has earned an extra $2.3 million on his salary for 2026 by earning a Proven Performance Escalator, for total compensation of about $3.6 million.  It should be noted that this salary is not guaranteed.  If the Seahawks want to trade him, cut him, or negotiate his contract down, they can do so, saving nearly all that cap money.

There is a potential for the Seahawks to take as much as $3.5 million more in cap charges on in 2026, as Sam Darnold’s contract has incentives in his contract.  I would say some of it is reachable.  I put in $2 million as a guestimate that Darnold will earn more than half of what is available.  Some of that includes money for NFC Championship game and Super Bowl wins.  I trust that no one would be upset with taking on those kinds of cap charges in 2026.

I allocated $17.5 million to complete the roster out and listed some of the popular choices among the upcoming different Free Agents the Seahawks will have and will likely consider retaining.  While they may not keep all those players, an equivalent can be found at a similar cost among the draft or in Free Agency (I think Eric Saubert is already signed for 2026, we just do not have his contract available yet).

The meat of the off season will be what they do with that $35 million they can spend.

Pending Free Agents and Extension Candidates

Have a look at the roster below from a three-year outlook.  Included are players yearly cap hits and Free Agent status with age included.

Prominent Unrestricted Free Agents include unsigned members of the 2022 draft class: Boye Mafe, Kenneth Walker, Tariq Woolen and Coby Bryant.

Of that group, we know that the Seahawks have talked about an extension with Bryant per Brady Henderson but are not eye to eye on his value.

What about the other three?  They all seemed like easy choices to extend after their rookie seasons but now the picture is clouded.

Boye Mafe has not been effective rushing the passer this year, and his run defense – a core tenet of Mike Macdonald’s defense, particular for edges – has been average at best.  The Seahawks made him available around the trade deadline and he only seems to be a Seahawk because some trade terms could not be worked out.

Kenneth Walker has struggled with injuries and explosive runs are very hit and miss with him.

Tariq Woolen has been benched at times and is currently sharing a job with Josh Jobe.

I doubt the Seahawks would absolutely rule out bringing any of those players back.  Very likely, they will prioritize other players ahead of them.  If any of them want to come back it would be on a team-friendly contract.

Who would they prioritize?  It seems in-pattern to talk with Rashid Shaheed on an extension first.  Given the price they paid to acquire him (fourth and fifth-round picks next season) and assuming he shines as a player who can fill all kinds of roles in Klint Kubiak’s offense, it is obvious to conclude they would talk to him.  This follows consecutive offseasons of extending in-season acquisitions Ernest Jones and Leonard Williams.

What kind of contract could Shaheed expect?  A couple of weeks ago, I speculated that a 3-year $40 million contract would be a range it would take to extend him.

That would mean about an $8 million cap hit in 2026.  That takes their available cap down to about $29 million.

Which is fine — but if they want to go big-game hunting this offseason, they will need more.

Fortunately, they have the means to free up a bunch of cap space and keep their core together through some extensions:

Per Over the Cap, the Seahawks can pick up a maximum of $31 million through extending Williams, Nwosu and Cross.  I trimmed that a little to $23.5 million, as the Seahawks do not typically take the max room on an extension.  It makes sense to have some guaranteed money up front to allow for flexibility later.

All three of these could be in line for extensions.

Leonard Williams is the defense’s heart and soul and a player who is playing his best football now.  He will be 33 years old in 2027 when his contract is up.  What kind of contract could he demand at that age?

A couple of comps: Javon Hargrave at age 32 got a two-year $30 million contract on the Free Agent market this year.  Hargrave had missed most of 2024 with a torn tricep.  Cam Heyward last year signed a two-year, $29 million extension with the Steelers at age 35.

I could see the Seahawks extending him with something like a two-year $40 million contract that pays his 2026 salary up front in terms of a signing bonus and has some roster bonuses worked in to give the Seahawks decision points for some protection against declining skills as he ages.

Uchenna Nwosu is still only 29 years old and has rewarded the Seahawks’ faith by putting together a fine season of rock-solid run defense as well as being a reliably good pass rusher.  He is on track to match his career-best 2022 season while only playing about 50% of the snaps on average (he played an astounding 78% of the snaps in 2022).  A three-year $50 million contract with some injury protection would lock up his remaining best years and give the Seahawks another piece to secure on defense.  There might be additional motivation to get an extension done if and when Mafe walks.

Charles Cross may never be a top-10 Left Tackle in the NFL but it does seem that the team is happy with his production and would like to lock him into an extension.  It will be very interesting to see how the Seahawks value him.  His $17.5 million fifth-year tender in 2026 is a bargain – that would put him at #16 for AAV for Left Tackles.  Also to know: 10 Right Tackles and 11 Interior Linemen make more on AAV than Cross.  That makes Cross the 37th highest-paid Offensive Lineman.

There is a lot of talk that Cross will demand a contract in the $30 million per year range, which would elevate him to the highest-paid Left Tackle in the NFL.  Rashawn Slater is the current king of the mountain, having signed a $28.5 million AAV extension this year at age 26.

I just cannot see the Seahawks crossing the $30 million threshold to sign Cross.  

It will greatly depend on what he and his advisors think he is worth.  If he is firmly set on that top number, I can see the Seahawks standing on principle and exploring their options.

What about the Franchise Tag in 2027?  It would be very hard at this point to see it as an option for the Seahawks.  Why?  The current 2026 number is projected to be about $27 million and a standard increase would put it in the $29 million range.  Therefore, if the Seahawks do not value Cross at $30 million per season, the tag is not a great tool to advance negotiations, as it sets the floor for an extension.

As for tagging him and then letting him play out the season while they draft and develop a tackle behind him, that may be a potential option.  The cash and cap hit involved might be a hindrance to that strategy though.  If the team wants to be aggressive this offseason, that will include committing a very healthy chunk of their 2027 cap space to fit everyone in on the cap this season.  Tagging Cross might not be a viable option.

What kind of extension would work for both sides?  This summer I proposed a three-year $60 million extension for Cross, the primary value of which was to A) put a bunch more money into Cross’ pocket this year, have some financial protection against injury and get him primed for another extension at age 28 and B) give the Seahawks a chance to lock down a four-year starter at Left Tackle for three more seasons at a below-market rate.

That opportunity has passed.  And truth be told, it might be beneficial for both sides that it did.  For Cross, the obvious: he can make a whole lot more money by waiting.  For the Seahawks, it is not so obvious: they get another full season to evaluate Cross and see if he elevates his play.

What kind of compromise could the two sides make to get a contract done next fall?  I would guess a three-year contract between $75-85 million could be worked out.  Cross gets $25-28.3 million per season and the Seahawks get their Left Tackle locked up.

Making all those moves gives the Seahawks a war chest of about $51 million free and clear to work with.  They will be in the enviable spot of having plenty of young, developing talent and cap space to make strategic moves to greatly improve their roster.

What About Cooper Kupp and Sam Darnold?

Right now, OTC has Kupp with a $17.5 million 2026 cap number, with savings of $9.5 million if cut.

Given Kupp is far behind Jaxon Smith-Njigba as a target for Sam Darnold and his age is starting to become a question, some have wondered if Kupp would be cut in the spring.

That is highly unlikely.  His contract has $9 million salary that is guaranteed in February.  In essence, it is not guaranteed currently but it is as good as guaranteed (we discussed this in May here).

The closest the team has ever come to not letting that vesting date trigger was this year with Uchenna Nwosu.  The Seahawks needed cap room and Nwosu was coming off two very difficult seasons and was open to overtures from the Seahawks about reworking his contract to give the team relief yet allowing him to earn some of that money back.  It made sense for both sides to work something out.

So, unless Kupp and the Seahawks both have their backs up against a wall – unlikely – he will be on the team in 2026.

With Sam Darnold, it is similar but with a major caveat: Darnold and the team moved the roster bonus up from the typical mid-March to early February.  This is a way to force a decision on Darnold’s future sooner than normal and so Darnold and the Seahawks could both get their processes in motion about finding their next opportunity should the Seahawks decide to part ways.

It is safe to say that Darnold is staying in Seattle for 2026 at this point.

However, if the Seahawks want to get a jump on bulking up their cap space for 2026, they could convert Darnold’s $15 million roster bonus due in February to a pro-rated signing bonus, picking up another $11.25 million in cap room.

They also can pick up around $8 million more if they convert Darnold’s 2026 salary to bonus.  They could do this at any time leading up to Week One.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Devon Witherspoon

The Seahawks have until May 2026 to exercise the fifth year First Round option for 2027 on those two.

Just a reminder: It is a fully guaranteed year and the number is based on a formula that includes snaps and Pro Bowl selections.

Witherspoon’s number is $20.85 million for 2027.

Smith-Njigba’s is a little more fluid: He has met the snaps criteria to make his number $17.51 million.  However, an original ballot Pro Bowl selection this year will bump that number to $24.36 million.

That is the number I used for him on my chart below.  It is fair to project in ink that he will be a Pro Bowler with the season he is having.

Would the Seahawks tag both these players and push the negotiations for an extension to the fall of 2027 or even as far as March 2028?  It is possible.  That would follow what they did with Charles Cross.

My guess would be that in the current roster hierarchy of Cross, Smith-Njigba and Witherspoon, Smith-Njigba is the clear priority, Witherspoon is next and Cross third.

If Smith-Njigba were open to a contract extension, the Seahawks would happily sign him right now to a contract in the Justin Jefferson-CeeDee Lamb range and watch his contract get leapfrogged the next four years by other players (like they did with Tyler Lockett twice).  It just depends on what the player and his team want to do.  He might be very happy to let George Pickens, Drake London and Puka Nacua get their deals first to further establish his market value.

Devon Witherspoon is at a crossroads of sorts.  He has two Pro Bowls on his resume and is a very solid player.  But does he tilt the field or lock down a side like a top corner regularly does?  Will he take a bit of a backseat on the defense once Nick Emmanwori can be fully deployed?

Is he also willing to discuss an extension in 2026 and trade some market value for security?  Is the Cornerback market going to level off a little after a crazy one-year jump (Patrick Surtain got $24 million AAV in fall 2024, Derek Stingley and Sauce Gardner both topped $30 million less than a year later)?

Those are the questions both sides must answer next year.

Concluding Thoughts

I want to emphasize that this piece is an exploration of the possibilities, not necessarily a recommendation of what I think the Seahawks can or should do.

Each lever the team can pull and get some 2026 cap space might not be pulled.  But we need to know where the levers are and the benefits of pulling them.

Many fans are concerned about using and abusing the company credit card in the name of immediate gains to get some fantasy-roster style wish-fulfillment that rarely works out as desired.

The truth is teams that are not using their credit card (even moderately) are falling behind.  The salary cap is rising so quickly that intelligent teams must take advantage.

In the next two days, when you focus on NFL football, keep an eye out for two things: the ratings the league will pull for the four games played Thursday and Friday and the number of gambling commercials and other endorsements you will experience as you watch them.

The league is a monster, the current North American champion of pro sports.  The revenues it generates are just going to get greater.

The Seahawks drafting well and escaping mind-numbing contracts like Jamal Adams, Quandre Diggs and Geno Smith and reshaping their roster with flexible contracts that provide value opens tremendous opportunities for them to be competitive in the trade and Free Agency markets.  The current core of key players that are peaking and the amount of cap space resources they have available to them put them in one of the more enviable positions in the NFL.

The Seahawks are a really good team and a contender — but they might be a year away from greatness

Week 12 further emphasised how wide-open this season is.

The Kansas City Chiefs very nearly dropped to 5-6. The Bills lost on Thursday night to fall to 7-4. The Packers — many people’s pre-season favourites in the NFC — have been anything but convincing so far.

We’re living in a world where the New England Patriots are reborn as the team with the best record in the league. The Colts are a threat. The Broncos never seem to play well but win anyway.

I covered the Eagles vs Cowboys game for national radio in the UK on Sunday. For a quarter-and-a-half Philadelphia looked like they were primed for another run to the Super Bowl. They led 21-0 in the second quarter. Then they failed to score a single point in the second half, collapsed, and lost.

We often talk about parity in the NFL but it’s never been more evident. We could easily see a team (or teams) in the Super Bowl nobody would’ve predicted back in August.

The Seahawks are very much in the mix. They have the ingredients needed to contend this season. With no real dominant force in either conference, having a balanced roster like Seattle’s with just enough quality in key areas can take you far.

Yet I feel like they’re still probably a year away — and that’s fine. I’m not ruling anything out. I’m not suggesting they won’t make a Super Bowl run, or that they can’t. I’m just not convinced this will be the year.

Going into this season I expected they’d be a strong team. My hope was that they would win the NFC West. My expectation was that they would make the playoffs. A real sign of progress would be to win at least one playoff game.

Nothing’s changed for me. Even as this season has unwrapped itself as one of the most unpredictable in recent memory, with fresh opportunities emerging, I think it’s important to note that this is still a building team.

They naturally won’t see it that way and will aim high. We as observers can afford to take a step back though and use perspective.

For starters, this is a roster with only a smattering of playoff experience. Cooper Kupp and Ernest Jones won a Super Bowl with the Rams. DeMarcus Lawrence has played in nine playoff games in his career, with three wins. Leonard Williams has two playoff appearances, a win and a loss in 2023. Julian Love also featured in those games with the Giants. Sam Darnold had the much-discussed Rams game last season.

Pretty much everyone else has no experience of the post-season — or they featured in Seattle’s comfortable loss in San Francisco at the end of the 2022 season.

Compare this to the other two teams in the NFC West. San Francisco has a roster chock full of players who know what the playoffs are about, with a Head Coach who’s been part of three Super Bowls (if you count his run with Atlanta as offensive coordinator).

The Rams have a young defense but they are led at the top by a vastly experienced Head Coach and quarterback duo who already won a Super Bowl together. Davante Adams has played in 11 playoff games in his career too. Their key parts at the top of the franchise can lead from the front.

I thought the Seahawks in 2012 really benefitted from winning and losing a playoff game the way they did. That was a roster capable of great things but it wasn’t quite ready. It needed a bit more experience and a little more quality. They won in Washington then blew a game in Atlanta. By 2013 they were the best team in the NFL and that initial playoff experience — the first for many on the young roster — would’ve helped.

I’m not sure it’s realistic to think the Seahawks would cope with a playoff situation better than the Rams, Eagles or 49ers. At least not three times, which will be required if they end up as a Wild Card team. I’m totally comfortable with this though. Sometimes to get to the top you’ve got to collect a few scars. This is only year two of the Mike Macdonald regime.

I think we’ve seen a little of why that might prove to be the case in this regular season. The Seahawks have given the ball away too much on offense. Even yesterday, Sam Darnold had some risky moments and could’ve easily added to his 10 interceptions for the season — tied for fourth most in the NFL with only Geno Smith, Tua Tagovailoa and Trevor Lawrence ahead of him.

Things like turnovers and red zone execution matter in the critical games. A lot of the reaction to last week’s loss in LA was to highlight the Seahawks nearly won despite throwing four picks. An important alternative view is that the Rams managed the game without making those critical errors and ultimately won, while playing nowhere near their top level. I’m not confident that if the teams met in the playoffs that Darnold would avoid mistakes. I’m a lot more confident Matthew Stafford would.

We’ve talked about a lack of signature wins too. Going back to 2012 again, there are some good reference points. The win in Chicago enabled people to see how brilliant Russell Wilson could be, justifying his starting role after some rookie growing pains. Then, the demolition of the 49ers before Christmas — a week after San Francisco embarrassed the Patriots in their own backyard — confirmed this was a serious team that could beat the best.

By 2013 there were the wins against the Niners in week two and the Monday Night Football beatdown of the Saints to rubber-stamp the Seahawks as the NFC’s top dog. It feels like we’re still waiting for that moment where this version of the Seahawks arrives by knocking off a top team in a big game.

That could come against the Rams in a few weeks, or even in the playoffs. Until it happens though, I think there’s a little bit of doubt as to whether they can. So far they’ve lost their three most important games to San Francisco, Tampa Bay and the LA Rams. The Rams have now beaten the 49ers (albeit they split the series) and the Buccs. They also won an epic contest last season against the Bills and won a playoff game. The Seahawks last year lost to all of the NFC playoff teams they faced.

Another less important thing (but something I want to mention) is the way some of the second halves have gone. Games against the Jaguars, Cardinals (road), Texans and now Titans have been a lot closer in the scoreline than necessary. Their point differential in those games is +25 — when in reality, any one of those games could’ve produced a point differential of +25 alone.

They’ve not always played their best football when comfortably ahead, which is understandable I suppose. It’s tricky to play four quarters of smothering football when the job is done in the first half. Opponents tend to sink or swim — and Seattle’s opponents have opted for a scrap not a surrender to their credit.

It does make me wonder though whether they’re just maybe lacking one more impact player. Are they short of that devastating game-wrecker who just puts everything to bed?

I firmly believe they’ll go big-game hunting in the off-season. A bad draft paired with a growing opportunity could spur them on. Regulars will know the name I keep bringing up — Maxx Crosby. I wonder if there’ll be a call made to the Raiders when the season’s over?

In 2013 they added Michael Bennett and Cliff Avril to finish off their roster. Perhaps they’re now in a situation where a similar addition (or two) will push the current-day Seahawks into the top tier?

I’m sure to some this will be viewed as a negative article because I’m not simply saying the Seahawks are a Super Bowl contender and that’s that. Like I said, I wouldn’t rule anything out this season. They’ve got a chance. A whole bunch of teams do. They’re one of the best teams in the league.

Yet I think this season, for me at least, was always about taking the next step and in 2026 feeling like that could be the year. Get some playoff experience under your belt. Show you can beat the best. Get more time with this staff working with the players, on both sides of the ball. Have another off-season where you can add more talent — and perhaps be aggressive to get the blue-chip player(s) you need to take the next step.

The Seahawks are on the right track but we might be watching a table being set for 12 months time.

My first Horizontal Board for the 2026 NFL Draft

Today I am publishing the first draft of my 2026 Horizontal Board. There are 144 players graded so far. I will continue to add names as we go along. It should also be noted that there’s ample time for things to change, especially when we get to the Senior Bowl and combine.

Here are some short headlines:

— Arvell Reese (LB) and Caleb Downs (S) are the top two players in the draft, both from Ohio State

— I currently only have four players with legit first round grades and only 33 graded in the first two rounds

— There isn’t a single quarterback I would personally draft in the first round

— I really like Ohio State defensive tackle Kayden McDonald

— There are lots of appealing zone-blocking specialists, many play tackle but are projected to guard (like Grey Zabel) 

— The depth in this class is so thin, it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that the fifth round pick used to acquire Rashid Shaheed could’ve ended up being a priority UDFA on Seattle’s board

— This is one of the most challenging drafts in recent memory, if not the most challenging, due to the lack of top-end quality and weak depth

I want to explain the way I’m grading. The top tier of players are prospects who would legitimately go in the first round in any draft. Tier two are fringe first round prospects — essentially players I can imagine going in round one but there are question marks (lack of production, more upside than proven quality, good players but not necessarily game-changers). The rest of the tiers are self-explanatory.

How this class will impact the Seahawks

If the season finished today, they would own the 27th pick in round one. I would suggest it’s going to be nearly impossible to draft a player with a first round grade in that slot in 2026. Their second pick would be #58. I don’t think it’s very likely a player with a second round grade would be available there either.

I’ve discussed this quite a lot already — and we’ve been pretty good at reading the tea leaves over the years — but I wouldn’t be surprised if the Seahawks aggressively pursued a high-profile veteran trade in the off-season. The name I keep coming back to is Maxx Crosby.

The Raiders clearly tried to fast-track relevancy by hiring Pete Carroll and it’s backfired. Increasingly it looks like they will be forced to embrace a longer-term build when the season ends, including potentially another coaching change.

Crosby’s contract extension is set up with great flexibility. Trading him in March would only cost the Raiders $5m in dead money. The move would create $30.8m in cap space. I would suggest it feels increasingly likely they will trade Crosby for picks to kick-start a rebuild.

The Seahawks will need to replace Boye Mafe somehow. Seeing his name circulated the way it was by Adam Schefter makes me assume he won’t be re-signing with the Seahawks. The 2026 draft class is poor at EDGE rush.

I had previously suggested Cleveland’s Alex Wright as a free agent target but he signed a new deal with the Browns today. I think the Seahawks will be working the floor at the combine, seeing what is possible, with the idea they might be willing to trade their top pick in 2026.

The Horizontal Board

Those marked in red either have current injuries or reported injury concerns/injury history. Click the image to enlarge:

Position-by-position breakdown

Quarterback

None of the quarterbacks this year have the upside to be franchise leaders in my opinion. Fernando Mendoza is the trendy choice in the media but I’m not convinced. If he’s drafted by a team with an existing foundation and a proven offensive leader, fine. Those teams don’t pick early in round one. His arm is reasonable not great, he’s not a creative improviser and he plays in a clockwork-like system that emphasises a lot of back-shoulder and high-percentage throws. His big win, on the road at Oregon, was not a particularly impressive display.

Ty Simpson has shown technical quality and an assortment of NFL throws on tape. However, in recent games some rough edges have also been exposed. He’s only a one-year starter and should consider, even at his age (23 next month), returning for another year at Alabama.

Garrett Nussmeier has had an injury-impacted season where he has struggled along with LSU. There’s a lot to like with Nussmeier and this could work to his advantage. If he falls into the rounds 3-4 range, he could end up on a better team with less pressure to start quickly. There could be value to be had.

Taylen Green reminds me of Colin Kaepernick to a degree. For most of this season he excelled despite playing for an Arkansas side that was doing its best impression of the 2025 Cincinnati Bengals (explosive offense, no defense). Recently though he’s turned the ball over too often with some ugly interceptions. Even so, I would rather draft to develop him in the middle rounds than spend a top-10 pick on another QB from this class.

Some people still believe Carson Beck has something to offer. After two years of horrendous turnovers, I’ll let someone else take that chance.

Running back

It’s not how it was a year ago in terms of depth but there are good players to be had here. Jeremiyah Love is a truly dynamic playmaker but I do think he’ll need to be paired with a more physical runner. The Lions did this with Jahmyr Gibbs and took him in the top-15. In this class, there’s a chance someone will do the same with Love.

Emmett Johnson at Nebraska is a hidden gem. He has good size, his change of direction skills are impressive and he has a rare ability to dodge tackles and escape into space. He can be used as a runner or pass-catcher and his production has been excellent this season. I like him a lot.

I’m not ready to give up on Penn State’s Nicholas Singleton. This hasn’t been his season and recently Kaytron Allen has taken the lion’s share of the reps. However, Singleton is the more explosive, high-upside talent.

Mike Washington Jr has a little bit of Knile Davis to him, while Raleek Brown is also very intriguing.

I get the sense the Seahawks want a slashing, dynamic runner in the mould of De’Von Achane. I wouldn’t even rule out them making a pitch to trade for him in the off-season, especially if Ken Walker departs. That’s another name to monitor.

Wide receiver

I promise this isn’t just recency bias but the more I watch of USC’s Makai Lemon the more of a Jaxon Smith-Njigba vibe I get. Let me be clear, there’s a talent difference. JSN deserves to be treated with the ‘one of a kind’ tag with the way he’s playing. Lemon will be fortunate to be two-thirds of the player Smith-Njigba is. However, they share a natural quality that doesn’t rely on blazing speed or size. They both make getting open look easier than it is. Lemon subtly gets open, tracks the ball brilliantly, has good hands, can stretch the field with shiftiness and he can be a terror running across the middle.

Carnell Tate has been one of the more impressive, improved players this year. He’s been so clean with his routes and hands. You know where he’s going to be and he’ll be there on time. He can elevate and extend to make difficult catches. His body control is superb. There will be questions about his timed forty-yard-dash though.

KC Concepcion and Jordyn Tyson seem more like day-two prospects to me but they could get elevated in a down-year for overall talent. Oregon’s Evan Stewart would’ve been in the mix to be a high pick but he suffered a serious knee injury.

Tight end

I’ve not been impressed with the class of tight ends. Eli Stowers is TE1 on my board thanks to a combination of size and athleticism. They’ve started to feed him the ball and in the right system, he could end up being a day-two mismatch steal.

Kenyon Sadiq has been underwhelming and his play inconsistent. His size and frame reminds me of Irv Smith Jr. It’s believed he will eventually have a remarkable testing session at the combine and that will help.  His flashes are exciting but what is he at the next level? A big slot?

I’ve been impressed with Josh Cuevas at Alabama but he’s very much a day-three talent.

Offensive tackle

Many of the tackles in this class will need to kick inside. I have Utah’s brilliant right tackle Spencer Fano as OT1 with a legit first round grade. However, even he might be seen as a better fit at guard. He’s a devastating, tone-setting blocker who loves to finish.

Alabama’s Kadyn Proctor has been one of the most overrated players by the media this year. He’s too big and struggles to defend speed off the edge. Sure — it’s great seeing him show off incredible athleticism when they hand the ball off to him in the red zone or even ask him to catch a pass. Yet his angles and agility defending the blindside leave a lot to be desired. He might be better off as a gap-scheme guard.

If you’re looking for a franchise left tackle in this draft, good luck.

Guard

There are decent options thanks to the number of tackles projected to move inside. Francis Mauigoa at Miami is the lead dog and could find a home in the top-15. Like Fano, he plays with a lot of aggression.

Vega Ioane is a massive, athletic, mobile pass-protector who can easily work on his run-blocking skills to become a long-time starter at left guard.

Duke’s Brian Parker is an excellent zone blocker who should move inside one spot from right tackle. He could be a strong option for the Seahawks. Iowa’s Gennings Dunker has been a blog favourite for some time. He’s extremely physical and effective in the run game. I’m not sure there’s a level of upside here that should have him graded any higher than day two but he’s certainly someone who would fit at right guard — and he’s an accomplished zone blocker. I’m a big advocate for drafting Iowa linemen when you a.) want to run the ball and b.) use mainly zone blocking concepts. Ohio State left tackle Austin Siereveld is another very good operator in zone who is expected to move inside.

I was surprised how easily Georgia Tech’s Keylan Rutledge progressed to the second level. He’s a pure right guard in college. His frame says he’d be a better phone-booth blocker but he easily pulled, combo’d and operated in space. Indiana’s Carter Smith has wild technique and sometimes his arms and legs are all over the place but somehow it seems to work. There’s no denying that he handles zone concepts well and could be a very useful guard.

Later on, Beau Stephens — Iowa’s left guard — will provide some day-three value. I think Oregon transfer Emmanuel Pregnon is a bit overrated.

Center

It’s a bit of a one-man show at this position at the moment. Iowa’s Logan Jones is a Tyler Linderbaum-level athlete but lacks the refinement of his former team-mate. He’s put together back-to-back strong seasons and could be strongly considered by the Seahawks as a long-term fixture at center, ending the annual change at the position.

I haven’t seen any other center so far that I’d covet for Seattle’s scheme. Alabama’s Parker Brailsford certainly has talent and he’s a scheme fit but he hasn’t played well enough.

EDGE

I’m really surprised at the way the EDGE class has been portrayed in the media. To me it just screams ‘meh’. I don’t see a first round pure edge rusher. There’s nobody who lights up the tape with a blazing bend-and-straighten. The 2027 draft will feature the incredible Dylan Stewart and Colin Simmons. There’s nobody like that here.

I’ve got Oklahoma’s R Mason Thomas at the top because I like his effort and hustle but he’s nothing like former blog favourite Nik Bonitto as a speed rusher. Clemson’s TJ Parker has been one of the biggest disappointments of the season. Cashius Howell’s production has been great but he has short arms and I’m not convinced his 2025 success translates to the NFL. David Bailey and Romello Height are a great combo for Texas Tech but I don’t see special qualities. Michigan’s Jaishawn Barham, converted from linebacker, has raw tools that could be developed.

I don’t see the next great NFL rusher in this class — unless a team successfully turns Arvell Reese into a full-time EDGE.

Defensive end

If the EDGE group is overrated, the DE group takes things up a notch. It’s incredible how much hype there’s been for Rueben Bain Jr — a bulky run defender with 30-inch arms. It feels like some of the steam has cooled on the ‘best player in the draft’ rhetoric from a few weeks ago — but still. He’s a day two prospect.

Keldric Faulk is long and big with athletic upside but the production isn’t there. In a weak draft he still likely goes in the first round because, frankly, you need to take someone and he has growth potential. Dani Dennis-Sutton has played in flashes this year and while he doesn’t have Faulk’s frame, he could go earlier than some think with good testing.

Anthony Smith at Minnesota could play with more aggression and he’s not consistent. Yet he’s stacking up the sacks this year (9.5) and that can’t be ignored. Matayo Uiagalelei and LT Overton look like typical day two bigger ends. I’m not convinced either will be a pass-rush threat at the next level.

Missouri’s Zion Young is a bit off the wall and plays with an all-out motor and plenty of physicality and aggression. However, there’s a lot of stiffness to his movements. I think Miami’s Akheem Mesidor is a fairly average prospect.

When Tyreak Sapp can be arsed he looks really good. But there’s too much tape where he’s going through the motions.

Defensive tackle

Ohio State’s Kayden McDonald is among the six best players eligible for the draft next year. He’s an absolute wall against the run and pummels opponents with a jolting punch to disrupt and control blocks. The difference making quality, however, is the way he disengages. He’s not just a space-eater absorbing double-teams. There’s plenty of evidence of him ripping off blockers to break free into the backfield. The problem is he’s so big that having released from the block he hasn’t got the quickness to be a devastating pass rusher. For me, it doesn’t matter. Players like this who are huge yet in proportion with minimal body-fat, who can over-power pretty much any blocker they come across and find a way to get off blocks and get into the backfield — you can win in the trenches with players like this. I really like Kayden McDonald.

Peter Woods is expected to have an excellent combine and his 2024 tape showed flashes of top-10 potential. However, like most of the Clemson team, he’s been poor this year. Woods has been a non-factor in every game I’ve watched in 2025 (most of them) with no signs of a difference making, versatile defensive lineman. If he runs and jumps as well as expected, teams might chalk his bad year down to a Clemson thing. As with Keldric Faulk, you have to take someone. Betting on developing Woods is a better option than most other alternatives available.

Caleb Banks’ injury situation at Florida has prevented him from having any momentum but he is athletic and disruptive. Domonique ‘Big Citrus’ Orange is another big-bodied disruptor who can anchor and yet still break through blocks. He’s not close to McDonald’s potential but he’s noticeable on tape.

Gracen Halton at Oklahoma is smaller but highly aggressive and very disruptive. Tim Keenan from Alabama is another big-bodied nose tackle with a fair amount of potential. He can make a NFL rotation. A’Mauri Washington at Oregon is a great athlete for his size and he has some good reps on tape — but nowhere near enough to justify the first round hype.

Linebacker

I’ve said for a few weeks now — I would take Arvell Reese first overall. I don’t think anything will change that unless character concerns emerge, an injury issue or a bad testing session. His sideline-to-sideline ability, heat-seeking missile approach to the ball-carrier and his range are impressive enough. Then you see him lined up off the edge and just handling +300lbs blockers with power. It’s astonishing.

Pittsburgh’s Kyle Louis is undersized but frankly, I don’t care. The guy flies around the field with reckless abandon, hits people in the face and he’s an excellent cover linebacker. In the modern NFL you can use a player like this in so many different ways. By all accounts he’s also described as highly committed to his craft, someone who leads by example and a perfect pro.

Then we’re back to overrated players unfortunately. I don’t see why people have Anthony Hill or CJ Allen as high as they do. I’m not sure about Hill’s athletic upside while Allen just looks like a two-down thumper with limitations.

Sonny Styles’ athleticism is really intriguing but how does this translate to linebacker in the NFL, having already switched positions from safety? Does he move back? Can he be a hybrid? Harold Perkins is an enigma — showing little flashes of brilliance but also a whole lot of nothing at times too. It’s hard to work out what his best position is.

Jake Golday has major athletic upside and good size, while Cade Uluave just puts his body on the line to fly around and hit people.

Cornerback

I was really surprised by how much I liked Kelley Jones at Mississippi State. He’s massive and has a DK Metcalf-esque physique. I expected him to look a bit stiff in transition but he actually does a good job sticking in coverage. On top of that, he seems to have good speed and length. His run support is good enough and his completion percentage in coverage is one of the best in college football. Mississippi State runs more zone than man. He’s played well in both — but a little bit better in man. I think that’s his best fit at the next level with his size.

Jermod McCoy is also a talented player — although he face-guards way too much. An injury has kept him on the sidelines all season and that impacts his stock.

Brandon Cisse is a better fit, I think, for Seattle’s defense. He’s shifty and more agile. He’s not a physical corner in coverage and that’s surprising, because for the most part his run defense is decent. Avieon Terrell similarly is probably a better fit too and he’s performed a lot better in zone than man for Clemson. He’s the brother of AJ Terrell, the 16th pick in 2020 by Atlanta. Given the way he’s played this year I’d be surprised if the younger Terrell matches that — he feels like more of a day two pick. He has some talent though.

Safety

I think there are some good options here, headlined by Caleb Downs who will probably be a top-five pick. Testing will be interesting for him and could cap his upside. Yet on the field you can use him in so many different ways and the natural talent is off the charts.

Dillon Thieneman the Purdue-to-Oregon transfer is very interesting. He has good size yet his range playing deep is very impressive. He covers ground quickly and has an eye for the football (he had six interceptions as a freshman at Purdue). He can also line up in different areas and he’ll deliver a hit when needed. If he declares, he could end up being a fast riser. The expectation is he’ll be a top tester. He has an opportunity to be one of the best players in this class.

Earl Little Jr at Florida State (ex-Alabama) also intrigues me as a playmaker and cover supremo. Keon Sabb is a solid if unspectacular prospect. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren is long and rangy but it’s hard to truly judge him on the limited tape access I have to Toledo. Testing and the Senior Bowl will be big for him.

What does it mean for the Seahawks?

As noted earlier, I wouldn’t be shocked if they pull a 2021 and punt on this draft — opting for the trade market instead. Sure, it’s possible for me to list players I like who fit the Seahawks. Yet if you’re having to draft those players a round or more earlier than your board dictates, that’s not a place you want to be in.

That said — if the trade market isn’t an option — they will have an opportunity to further add to their offensive line if they wish. Options at cornerback and the defensive line also exist. It’s not a total lost cause — but this won’t be a draft to really get the juices flowing in the off-season.

Monday thoughts: Drafting linemen, the importance of run defense, Ernest Jones’ F-bomb and my main Seahawks gripe

I’m going to run through a bunch of topics in this piece including:

— Why I think you need to draft Iowa offensive linemen
— Why it’d be crazy for any team to draft a QB early in 2026
— The importance of run defense within Seattle’s EDGE defenders
— The brilliance of Ernest Jones’ post-game comments
— My main Seahawks gripe

Just keep drafting Iowa offensive linemen

I watched the Hawkeyes play USC at the weekend and was again struck by just how capable they are at running the ball, despite being very much a one-dimensional offense.

Every year it’s the same at Iowa. It doesn’t matter who they recruit or transfer in at quarterback, they typically struggle to form a coherent passing offense. They always rely on the run and for the most part succeed.

On Saturday they ran for 183 yards against the Trojans at 5.5 YPC. They only lost by five points on the road. Their ability to run the ball, play physically in the trenches and create running opportunities is the heartbeat of the team.

It doesn’t always work. Against Oregon they managed 101 yards but it came at a paltry 2.3 YPC. They didn’t run efficiently and lost by a couple of points as a consequence. Their style of play, though, shortened the game which was to their advantage. The Ducks have a lot more star power on their roster.

Against Penn State they ran for 245 yards at 7.4 YPC and won by a point.

This could be noteworthy for the Seahawks for a few reasons.

Firstly, Iowa runs between three-or-four times more in zone than gap. They also do it very well. Their players consistently grade among the best zone blockers in college football. If you’re looking for linemen who can quickly adapt to your scheme, this is the school to look at. The Seahawks drafted Mason Richman in the seventh round a year ago. The only other draftable Iowa lineman, Connor Colby, was drafted 15 picks later by the 49ers (who run the same style of offense).

In the next draft we’ll see center Logan Jones, right tackle Gennings Dunker and left guard Beau Stephens available. All could be on the table for the Seahawks.

It’s also increasingly clear drafting to develop is going to have to be the way.

There is some slight hope I suppose that the Baltimore Ravens allow Tyler Linderbaum to reach free agency. They’d be absolutely mad to do it — but I’m going to at least acknowledge he’s a pending free agent before somebody mentions his name. It will be stunning if they allow him to leave.

Despite a lot of hand-wringing in the local media, with one person even saying it would be a travesty if they didn’t sign Mekhi Becton or Tevin Jenkins, none of the free agent names people pined for have worked out with the exception of Drew Dalman who is playing well for the Bears.

The veteran options rarely provide solutions because a talent-starved NFL desperately searching for linemen don’t often allow the good ones to enter the market.

The Seahawks will just have to keep adding to their stable and now they have a clear vision for their blocking scheme and offense, not to mention coaches who appear capable of actually developing talent, they should be able to find solutions to create depth and competition.

Dunker is destined to kick inside to right guard, with Jones a clear option to act as a plug-and-play center. I thought both played excellently against USC, despite Dunker leaving the game late on with an injury that isn’t considered serious.

I think you’d have to be crazy to draft a quarterback early in 2026

Ty Simpson has been a pleasure to watch for Alabama this season thanks to his technical quality and playmaking. However, in the last couple of games a few rough edges have emerged. It’s not a surprise — this is his first year as a starter. There’s growing evidence that he’d be best served returning for another season at Alabama and isn’t a likely fit as a high draft pick.

Fernando Mendoza now has a clear path to be the first quarterback taken. Even then, I don’t think he’s any kind of franchise saviour. No team should be looking to begin a major rebuild by plonking Mendoza in as the first building block and the face of the club.

It might still happen. There are plenty of examples of teams not having any idea how to build a roster. Look at the Titans. They clearly badly need talent across the board but when in possession of the #1 pick they reached in a big way on a quarterback who isn’t special and now what do they have? The worst record in the NFL still and Ward — who has struggled in year one — might just end up in the same boat as Will Levis and Malik Willis.

In fact Levis as a rookie had nine total touchdowns and four picks in nine games. Cam Ward has six touchdowns and six interceptions in 10 games so far. This is a franchise not learning from past mistakes. Constantly drafting young quarterbacks who aren’t graded at an extremely high level when your roster stinks shouldn’t be the plan.

Mendoza doesn’t have the big arm, creative ability or special tools to think ‘you’ve got to draft this guy’. He’s also now playing in the environment which might be the best in college football outside of Ohio State for quarterbacks. Curt Cignetti is an unlikely tour de force Head Coach but the man is clearly one of the biggest talents to emerge in coaching in recent history. His systems on offense appear simple yet unstoppable. He isn’t winning with a boat-load of five-star recruits. It’s simply excellent coaching.

Mendoza is an upgrade in terms of upside over Kurtis Rourke but the fact is both benefitted from a system that feels like it can be interchangeable at the position and the good times will likely keep on rolling for Indiana with Cignetti in charge.

I’d be wary of drafting Mendoza and pinning your hopes on him. And if it’s not him, which other quarterback are you taking early?

Something to consider with EDGE rushers in 2026

We’re learning all the time about Mike Macdonald and this year, the turn towards DeMarcus Lawrence is something to note. He is a bigger defensive end who carries an ‘alpha’ energy and plays the run well. Derick Hall shares a lot of the same qualities and seems to be well liked. Uchenna Nwosu is another aggressive run defender off the edge (see: evidence here).

Boya Mafe is not cut from the same cloth. He’s the name Adam Schefter was circulating before the trade deadline, while reporting after it was closed that he was almost dealt to the Chiefs.

It seems increasingly likely Mafe will not be back with the Seahawks next year. He would need to be replaced. I still think there’s a chance they’ll trade their first round pick for a replacement, given how bad the 2026 draft is shaping up to be. Maxx Crosby’s run defense grade is almost identical to Lawrence’s. He feels like the kind of player they love to acquire — and I continue to think he could be a target for Seattle in the off-season.

Alex Wright, former third round pick with the Browns, could be an outside bet to replace Mafe at a cheaper cost. He’s currently the third best run-defending EDGE in the NFL and a future free agent.

It’s also worth noting that Jalen Walker, who they apparently liked in the draft this year, is already among the ten best edge rushers for run defense.

If they have to look to the draft instead, there’s some good news.

Overall I think the EDGE class is overrated. You’ve got players like Rueben Bain getting tons of hype but I think it’s gone overboard. He has 30-inch arms and he’s not a quick-twitch athlete. His sack production is limited. Solid run-defending bigger defensive ends with short arms don’t go early in round one.

Cashius Howell is electric as a pass rusher but he’s another player with sub 31-inch arms. TJ Parker has been a massive let down and I’m not convinced at all that David Bailey or R Mason Thomas are first round talents.

There are some very decent run defense grades among the group though. All of the names below rank in the top-50 for run defense:

Akheem Mesidor — 90.3
Rueben Bain — 86.8
Jaishawn Barham — 86.7
Keldrick Faulk — 85.5
Dani Dennis-Sutton — 85.3
TJ Parker — 80.6
R Mason Thomas — 79.4

Here are some of the other noteworthy names:

David Bailey — 74.6
Derrick Moore — 74.2
Josh Josephs — 72.6
Anthony Smith — 71.5
Cashius Howell — 71.5
Matayo Uiagalelei — 68.3
LT Overton — 68.1
Romello Height — 62.1
Gabe Jacas — 57.5

It’s probably something to keep in mind. I’m not suggesting the Seahawks are going to overlook a dynamic specialist pass rusher purely on their ability to defend the run. Yet the evidence is suggesting that perhaps it does matter in the case of Mafe.

Here’s Seattle’s run defense grades so far this season:

DeMarcus Lawrence — 72.8
Derick Hall — 67.4
Uchenna Nwosu — 65.0
Boye Mafe — 59.0

If they replace Mafe, I suspect it’ll be with someone who’s better vs the run.

Why Ernest Jones’ post-game comments are among the best you’ll hear

If the intention was to take some of the heat off Sam Darnold, mission accomplished. I’ve heard Jones’ comments played on two national programmes already today. They are getting a decent airing — and that’s time that otherwise would’ve been spent talking about the quarterback.

The conversations are still going to happen about Darnold. It’s inevitable. But Jones is getting some of the attention because of his passionate way with words.

It also speaks to the effectiveness of a well-timed F-bomb (or two). Whether we want to accept it or not, the child in most of us can’t help but snigger at the sound of an unexpected swear. That particular word is also very effective in adding emphasis. In a way, the subconscious effect of Jones speaking this way is to tell you he ‘really’ believes in what he’s saying, because he swore.

He played an absolute blinder here — not only to draw attention away from the QB but to put a positive slant on things too. This was about as passionate as he could be publicly. He left no doubt as to what the attitude of the locker-room was to a four-pick performance. They’re standing by their team-mate.

And well done to whoever runs the Seahawks social media for putting out the unedited, unbleeped version online. That elevated the message to an even bigger audience.

Chapeau to Jones — and chapeau to the F-word for being so effective.

There is one final thing though…

In the time since the Rams game, I still can’t get over the thought that the Seahawks in their current form are still seeking a signature win.

They are clearly a very good team and can go toe-to-toe with the best in the NFC.

However, last year they lost to the following:

Detroit Lions
Buffalo Bills
LA Rams
Green Bay Packers
Minnesota Vikings

All made the playoffs. They also split with the 49ers, who finished 6-11 after suffering a bunch of injuries.

The only playoff team they beat last season was the Denver Broncos, in Bo Nix’s first ever NFL start in week one. It was a six-point victory. I’m not counting a week-18 win against the Rams backups.

This season, they’ve already lost to these three teams:

San Francisco 49ers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
LA Rams

They’ve beaten the Pittsburgh Steelers and Jacksonville Jaguars, both currently in the playoff picture, yet it’s not clear if they’ll remain there. They both seem pretty average at best. The Ravens might end up winning the AFC North and the Steelers and Jags will be under threat from the Chiefs for a wildcard berth.

They beat the Texans and their highly impressive defense — but would you call that a signature win? It’s not close for me.

The Seahawks need to start winning some of these big NFC games. We can say they’re capable. We can insist they will do it in the future. It has to start happening though. They can’t keep being unlucky losers in the biggest games.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Seahawks Draft Blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑